dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Peeler is Derek Richardson so it’s very relevant
what does any of this have to do with the academy, wasps or the higgs ?
Can anyone remember what this thread was about?
*** Ponders whether other clubs forums can be as monotonous as this one ***
So let me clear this up.....
You are only a 'supporter' if you post in the CCFC section?
You are only a 'supporter' if you go to games?
You are only a supporter if you post regular?
This is a CCFC forum but includes a wide range of other 'topics' including a Wasps section but if you venture into the CCFC part and only post elsewhere you are exempt from being a CCFC supporter?
What you type is only credible if you back it up? this appears to be an agenda by a couple of individuals recently
Is it acceptable to place in a public area information that is only available regarding individuals and when they signed up for accounts by people with Administrator rights, then use this information to publicly attack and make accusations against individuals, despite providing no evidence? but the accusers demand evidence and then make accusations without proof., if the information was provided the ICO and DPA alarm bells would be ringing, maybe any accusations of duplicate accounts should be handled in a more professional way, PM? accounts and multiple accounts should be handled in private regardless if they do not reply to PM's and not in public forums as you or anyone else for that matter cannot back accusations up without breaching data protection.
To back up the allegation of multiple accounts would possibly breach data protection, so as the poster often asks for evidence when others post, but can make accusations to others when suspecting multiple accounts whilst providing no evidence. Only his administrative rights.No one has said the above, its just arguments about it. I think you will find there are posters both sides of the fence who argue that information is only credible if backed up.
How is it breaching data protection saying a pseudonym account may have had another pseudonym account. No private data has been given, no personal information, therefore no data breached.
On the subject of Wasps, my own opinion is they are no better than Sisu, I personally do not want them in my town. If you like to pay and watch Rugby (i only played it) then go and watch a perfectly good team that has been in Coventry since 1874 CRFC (back up by link regarding dateJust to type something credible and back it up, in case anyone forgot where we were, Wasps have pulled out of the Higgs
YOUR reaction to Wasps pulling out of Higgs site
Well said!On the subject of Wasps, my own opinion is they are no better than Sisu, I personally do not want them in my town. If you like to pay and watch Rugby (i only played it) then go and watch a perfectly good team that has been in Coventry since 1874 CRFC (back up by link regarding date). also had grandfathers that played for CRFC myself included for a number of seasons.
So let me clear this up.....
You are only a 'supporter' if you post in the CCFC section?
You are only a 'supporter' if you go to games?
You are only a supporter if you post regular?
This is a CCFC forum but includes a wide range of other 'topics' including a Wasps section but if you venture into the CCFC part and only post elsewhere you are exempt from being a CCFC supporter?
What you type is only credible if you back it up? this appears to be an agenda by a couple of individuals recently
Is it acceptable to place in a public area information that is only available regarding individuals and when they signed up for accounts by people with Administrator rights, then use this information to publicly attack and make accusations against individuals, despite providing no evidence? but the accusers demand evidence and then make accusations without proof., if the information was provided the ICO and DPA alarm bells would be ringing, maybe any accusations of duplicate accounts should be handled in a more professional way, PM? accounts and multiple accounts should be handled in private regardless if they do not reply to PM's and not in public forums as you or anyone else for that matter cannot back accusations up without breaching data protection.
The issue is more when somebody only wants to use the forum to blow smoke up wasps arse, without any interest in ccfc in the slightest.
Nope...isn't that what the wasps sub forum is for ?
Nope...
Funnily enough, the wasps forum doesn't have a ccfc section
It' not squatting it is stupidity for leaving it empty for so long that someone else could take it over.yes, but CCFC are not squatting in the stadium that was built for them
No wrong again.
So let me clear this up.....
You are only a 'supporter' if you post in the CCFC section?
You are only a 'supporter' if you go to games?
You are only a supporter if you post regular?
This is a CCFC forum but includes a wide range of other 'topics' including a Wasps section but if you venture into the CCFC part and only post elsewhere you are exempt from being a CCFC supporter?
What you type is only credible if you back it up? this appears to be an agenda by a couple of individuals recently
Is it acceptable to place in a public area information that is only available regarding individuals and when they signed up for accounts by people with Administrator rights, then use this information to publicly attack and make accusations against individuals, despite providing no evidence? but the accusers demand evidence and then make accusations without proof., if the information was provided the ICO and DPA alarm bells would be ringing, maybe any accusations of duplicate accounts should be handled in a more professional way, PM? accounts and multiple accounts should be handled in private regardless if they do not reply to PM's and not in public forums as you or anyone else for that matter cannot back accusations up without breaching data protection.
What you type is only credible if you back it up? this appears to be an agenda by a couple of individuals recently
The GMK way.I always assumed having multiple accounts suggested people were using them at the same time, and to wum.
How is saying not many free tickets this season from what I have heard is sticking up for them?
That's only 12800 potential freebies for one game.
15%.Just out of interest.
Why do they doing so many free tickets compared to us.
We get 50% of the food at our games don’t we?
You don't understand the difference between "less free tickets" and no free tickets do you?
Let's face it Coventry City give away free tickets....it is good marketing. It turned me into a fan for life 46 years ago.
Even from free tickets they are making money;
1) Car parking.
2) Merchandising sales from club shop.
3) Food and Beverage sales
4) Potential returning customer.
Is this not correct then .....15%.
Just a couple of quick points to pick up on
The bonds are designed to be traded. At the moment whether they are sold/traded or not is not relevant to Wasps Holdings, because their concern is only how they are repaid in 2022. Until then the bond holders trade away from the Wasps Group. If for example 100K of bonds are traded in the month the total in issue still remains at £35m. That 100K represents 0.285% of the total in issue so some quite big numbers actually represent a small fraction of the bond total . For a trade to happen there must be someone willing to sell and someone willing to buy............ presently investors are still willing to pay over face value by around 4%
Because of the average spend per head being £6.32 for rugby crowds then an extra 12800 people attending, even for free, could bring Wasps in around £80k or a similar figure to the current average CCFC paying attendance. The incentive to give out free tickets is not the same for CCFC under current circumstances as CCFC receive a 50:50 split of any F&B profit (roughly in 2015 & 16 15% of turnover we are told) ............... given the crowd sizes now is there a profit to split this season? Plus bigger crowds mean bigger costs for CCFC as more of the stadium is opened up so free tickets could actually be a drain on CCFC. Of course some of the incentive to give out free tickets for both teams is to create a better atmosphere and to encourage engagement
If giving tickets away destroys their income won't it be OK by you?I do, but if giving away 2 free for every council employee and 4,000 for another game is less than before then how many were they giving away then?
Is this not correct then .....
CCFC retaining 100 per cent of ticket sales revenue.
The club also receives a slice of income from car parking and half of food and drink sales on matchdays?
So if we managed to give away extra free tickets if they bought food and drink would we not get 50%
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?