Pity that he didn't know the name of our Acadamy Director!
Pity that he didn't know the name of our Acadamy Director!
He knew the anagram,
Why do we need 2 strikers?
How many have we got in our squad that you are happy with? Would be nice if we could have at least one sitting on the bench so we could change things when needed.
To be honest I'd be surprised if there isn't someone better than Sheffers out there, like Trotta. Then we need someone to replace Platt Hulse would've been perfect.
Then we can play:
Murphy
Keogh Cranie Wood HH
Norwood Clingan Thomas
Nimley ST(Hulse-a-like) ST(eg Trotta)
S: Dunn, Christie, Deegan, Sheffers, Eastwood/Platt
Last I heard he still has a knee injury, same which caused him to be subbed vs Hull.I can't understand exactly what's up with McDonald, is he injured ? I keep hearing matchfitness and not having a pre-season but he's been here months so whats happening in training ? can't he have done a pre-season by now and what was he doing in the summer ffs when Norwich were doing thier pre-season, sounds a dodge pot to me, and how much did he cost ?
Why does it always seem to be us that get saddled with misfits ?
Anyone catch Waggotts interview? Only caught the end of it, where Clive mentioned QPR, and Waggott spoke about 'Rob' being included in QPR's 25 man squad. Was he referring to Rob Hulse?
What else was discussed? Anything of any worth? As I say, I only caught the end of the interview.
Waggott is a muppet. Achieved and delivered a big fat zero in real terms given his supposed contacts in football.
Nimley was recommended by Boro as part of the Juka deal.
Hreidarson (can's spell!) was available to whoever fancied a player at the end of his career.
What makes you think Middlesborough would recomend a player so they could get Juke? Thats nonsense imo. If he was any good, they'd have wanted to keep him, not encourage a competitor to sign him!! I dont believe that statement at all (i might be wrong).
Blimey, I actually agree with you on something!
You misjudge me. I simply retain a balanced perspective. You have me down as some sort of pro-SISU poster but that is not the case.
I want SISU out but only if there is a better option - and at the moment I know nothing of the alternatives other than a few headlines.
SISU continue to bankroll the club - yes they sell players and raise cash that way to help balance the books - but they do enough to keep the club afloat. I do not want admin and so driving SISU out without any plan B is, in my opinion, madness. That is simply my concern.
SISU do not bankroll the club!
Do you believe that the club has made a loss since SISU took over and, if so, who do you think has been making up that shortfall?
SISU do not bankroll the club! They keep us going by selling players, such as Lukas, Aron and Turner. That is where the funding for this season has come from. I assume anybody on our books will be sold in the summer that attracts a bid-Keogh being the only one who will attract decent money.
They may have lost money in the first few seasons, but not this season. No chance. Our transfer balance sheet is almost entirely cash coming in, and at each step the wage bill has got lower.
Lukas 1.5-2.25m
Aron 300-500k
Turner 750k
Sturridge 150k
That plus gate receipts and the smallest wage bill in the division is probably a bit of a profit.
Dumbest post you have made yet.
Get real. Is you loathing of SISU such that you are blind to the obvious?
Of course SISU have sold players - I said that. But the balance of the shortfall is being financed by SISU, hence the losses. I see you acknowledge as much in your subsequent post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?