I'm saying I predicted that they would be no good for us, never wanted them in the first place, and don't want them now.
Didn't need to be fucking Nostradamus to predict the behaviour of a hedge-fund with previous against them being led by a bloke who had been turned down by more punters than an 88 year old aids ridden whore.
We know nothing about PH4 either really, could be good, but very little real information on him out there, but will be lauded for a bit I expect.
Give you three years though Valiant if things not going well before you're calling him "a property developing c**t, HIV, Aids boy".
How come ACL will talk with Haskell but will only talk with the administrator and not SISU?
Football club sells two players it purchased. With breaking news like that, I'm surprised the entire fanbase didn't see the light.
All your posts lose all credibility (if they ever had any) after this bullshit offeringI turned against them after they sold fox and dann, it was obvious what their plan was after that. Why have i got a selective memory? How would you know about me shouting people down if you only joined this forum recently?
Don't know, he's probably a c-unit.
Sisu have sold every single player of any value since they've been here:facepalm:
I wasnt aware people can predict the future..
We know nothing about PH4 either really, could be good, but very little real information on him out there, but will be lauded for a bit I expect
'Arselickers' I'm one away from a line here!
you predicted the SISU outcome well.. what is your thoughts on PH4, as this is a valid point. Everyone is calling for him to take over the club, but what do we actually know about him?.. he's into property development projects..
so is that more likely to put him the dave whelan type of owner bracket -putting his money into the club to get them into the top tier of football , out of passion for the game & the club.... or the SISU bracket of owners - treating the club as secondary while they look to make money from the potentials associated to owning the club?
hmm .. im not saying hes a bad idea as an owner.. im just asking the question, rather than lauding him as the almighty savior, without really knowing anything about him or his intentions ???
Just not true.
Just not true.
Anythinghastobebetterthansisu.com
And yet PH4 is the King of Kings.
All worthwhile questions and ones which I suspect will have been posed by ACL, the administrator, and other members of the consortium. I would like to think he has a concrete business plan which will convince people he can do better than his (hopeful) predecessors.
As ACL and other members of the consortium would have supposedly posed similar questions to SISU, do you trust their judgement?
As ACL and other members of the consortium would have supposedly posed similar questions to SISU, do you trust their judgement?
I will trust the administrator to scrutinise the bid properly
So if the administrator decides a bid from SISU is a better option, you will accept that?
I'm not sure how SISU could bid when the vast majority of the debt is owed to themselves, but if he had strong justification that Haskell's bid was severely flawed then yes I would. I don't want preservation of the status quo and if Haskell's takeover did that then of course I wouldn't be in favour.
Personally I wouldn't like it but I'd have to accept it if everything was above board.So if the administrator decides a bid from SISU is a better option, you will accept that?
Utter bollox.
So if the administrator decides a bid from SISU is a better option, you will accept that?
Your memory must be sub-par. The likes of Cranie, Westwood and Gunnarsson walked for free; they should have been sold.
Why do you spend most of your time on here arguing with people who really don't want sisu here. You just do it for shock value I imagine. I don't think the club could last another season with sisu so I am all for a fresh owner who has done a deal to secure 50% of ACL. I think we should be hopeful about this story not feeling sorry for a company that has had certain chances but blew them in the hope they could rip off tax payers and a charity.how much more directly I can say 'I do not want SISU here' and 'SISU have failed' without those words being read as 'I love SISU and am bumming Fisher'!
Why do you spend most of your time on here arguing with people who really don't want sisu here. You just do it for shock value I imagine. I don't think the club could last another season with sisu so I am all for a fresh owner who has done a deal to secure 50% of ACL. I think we should be hopeful about this story not feeling sorry for a company that has had certain chances but blew them in the hope they could rip off tax payers and a charity.
Why do you spend most of your time on here arguing with people who really don't want sisu here. You just do it for shock value I imagine.
I was asking why you always argue sisu's corner if you want them gone? We're not just talking being dubious of new owners I was talking about their business tactics and ethics. If you really want sisu gone you don't come across like that and seem to question everything that is detrimental to sisu and then bleet that's because you're a proper fan. No need to resort to namecalling(zombie, nobbish?) something you're quick to label others with I've noticedI could equally ask why you want to get rid of people whose views differ from yours. Pathetic that's what it is, people like you who kill the club, and then you wonder why feck all fans go when some are so nobbish towards their fellow supporters.
Seriously, some of you need to get a grip and stop thinking everyone's out to get you. This ain't your fecking board anymore than it is mine, so stop trying to shut others up and either talk to them, or shut the feck up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?