Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Laughable.
I stated a fact. He wasn’t criticized. A lie was told about him paying 100k and I corrected it and Mart had the decency to admit it.
Sorry what’s your problem again?
HAHA!! No one on here likes Farage apparently, but criticise him and there's a fanboy jumping straight to his defence!
Remember, Hope not hate took him to court but his lying remarks were actually directed at Brendan Cox who's wife had been murdered, Farage is a scumbag.
Laughable.
I stated a fact. He wasn’t criticized. A lie was told about him paying 100k and I corrected it and Mart had the decency to admit it.
Sorry what’s your problem again?
Of course he lies he is a politician.
You say hypocritical Mart but you just said he had to pay 100k and he didn’t and you said in your last reply to CD you see so many inaccurate things on here. Just saying.
Brendan Coxs wife was murdered by a right wing extremist, farage then accused Cox of being an extremist himself live on radio. Today he was forced to apologise. But it's important to you to point out he hasn't paid any compensation?!
You agree with the decision to make him apologise?
Laughable.
I stated a fact. He wasn’t criticized. A lie was told about him paying 100k and I corrected it and Mart had the decency to admit it.
Sorry what’s your problem again?
Yes of course.
And yes you’re right it’s important to me the facts are shown. He hasn’t paid money when it was stated on here he did. That’s all.
Yes of course.
And yes you’re right it’s important to me the facts are shown. He hasn’t paid money when it was stated on here he did. That’s all.
He has to pay his costs of 100000.
Yes of course.
And yes you’re right it’s important to me the facts are shown. He hasn’t paid money when it was stated on here he did. That’s all.
His costs aren’t 100k. Anyway it’s not the point. I was just Correcting your original quote.
I think CVD summed it up well the last post so let’s leave it there.
He will have to pay his share of the costs. 100000 €, whatever he says. He didn’t win and was forced to say he will not repeat what he said, he has stated that hope not hate is not violent. The opposite of what he originally claimed.
Had he won, he would’ve stuck to his claims.
But, as you say, he is a liar and is trying to twist the facts.
He is a liar but he publicly apologized at least and now let’s move on.
Just like nobody defends Juncker. But look what happens when you mention him being PM and finance minister for Luxembourg when the tax dodge that has cost billions each year to EU countries started.HAHA!! No one on here likes Farage apparently, but criticise him and there's a fanboy jumping straight to his defence!
Remember, Hope not hate took him to court but his lying remarks were actually directed at Brendan Cox who's wife had been murdered, Farage is a scumbag.
We all know Farage is a c#nt. But at times he talks more sense than the EU.No. I am not going to repeat what you have already read in essay form. I think you are well capable of understanding the EU if you want to, but you don’t want to admit that it is at least, if not more democratic than the UK system.
The biggest problem I see is that the national governments have too much power. There should be more power vested in the EU parliament. It would take away the veto rights which work in, say, Luxemburg and Malta‘s case when we are talking about tax dodging.
I am not attempting to change the topic, but you sometimes throw news into threads. Just thought I would, seeing as Farage keeps getting shown for what a what a cxxt he is.
We all know Farage is a c#nt. But at times he talks more sense than the EU.
You go on about the EU having more power. That would be something to be worried about. Juncker would have got his one pilot steering the ship EU enterprise. We would have the EU army and lost all of our own national forces. They would have the right to take over our fiscal policies.
And that is just for starters.
HAHA!! No one on here likes Farage apparently, but criticise him and there's a fanboy jumping straight to his defence!
Remember, Hope not hate took him to court but his lying remarks were actually directed at Brendan Cox who's wife had been murdered, Farage is a scumbag.
Have you ever considered being a comedian?Exactly the opposite.
The EU Parliament is the directly elected body of 750 MEPs. Their power is restricted by national governments- like Juncker‘s Luxemburg who have veto power. Things would get done if the parliament had more power and it would be more democratic as people vote directly for MEPs.
More power is not all power.
The European Defence Union is voluntary. 23 have signed up, the rest haven’t. No mention at all about replacing national armies.
If the parliament were strengthened, how would the Commission and Council have more power? It would be the opposite.
There are no proposals for anyone to take over all fiscal measures. There should be a cohesive policy to reduce the differences in corporation tax and VAT. Which is a way of stopping people like Juncker.
In actual fact, by not wanting theses measures, you are constantly on Juncker’s side. Then you accuse me of defending him. A joke.
There should be a cohesive policy to reduce the differences in corporation tax and VAT.
European Union VAT directive. The aim of the EU VAT directive (Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax) is to harmonize VAT within the EU VAT area, and specifies that VAT rates must be within a certain range.
There is on VAT, corp tax policy is coming, didn't you know!
Gavin McLoughin: France and Germany planning assault on Ireland's corporation tax - Independent.ie
There is on VAT, corp tax policy is coming, didn't you know!
Gavin McLoughin: France and Germany planning assault on Ireland's corporation tax - Independent.ie
Perfect, you couldn't make this shit up.Jezza has a special friend.. :emoji_lizard:
Perfect, you couldn't make this shit up.
Andrew Marr has ruined John McDonnell this morning. Really just proves how Labour hasn’t costed it- it’s all ifs and buts, and ‘we think but don’t know’. It’s so worrying.
The ideas are good, but he has no answer as to how much they will cost, or how much they will return.
Andrew Marr has ruined John McDonnell this morning. Really just proves how Labour hasn’t costed it- it’s all ifs and buts, and ‘we think but don’t know’. It’s so worrying.
The ideas are good, but he has no answer as to how much they will cost, or how much they will return.
why is it worrying, they're not in Government.
You should be focusing on what the government are up to.
Same thing is going on in the States, all sort of shit going on with Trump so the right wing press is focusing on Hilary, she's an irrelevance. It's all a smoke screen, can't believe people fall for it.
Well it all depends on your views on how successful Labour would be if they gained power. I believe it would be an unmitigated disaster. And then I see a weak government; a weak PM and Labour winning in the opinion polls. I'd go as far as to say that this is one of the issues most prevalent in my mind presently. So, that's why some people, me included, are very interested in everything they say.
The Tories are often just as bad, yet it's strangely quiet when it's Hammond or Johnson.
why is it worrying, they're not in Government.
You should be focusing on what the government are up to.
Same thing is going on in the States, all sort of shit going on with Trump so the right wing press is focusing on Hilary, she's an irrelevance. It's all a smoke screen, can't believe people fall for it.
you've got a point as to why people should be interested, but they get more scrutiny than the government, that can't be justified can it?
I'm at work today so don't know who Marrs other guests were but following on from Mays visit to Sweden and the fracas with the Irish PM not to mention the British citizen jailed in Iran surely Labours spending policy should be well down the list of priorities and as many members of the cabinet as possible should have been on?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?