How many stories can we get out of a sentence off a random bloke.
Just asked the bloke at the car wash, he used to be a brick layer. He has said it would mean thousands of bricks.Depends who the bloke is and what the sentences are.
Managed to get several out of Tim Fisher, Mark Labovitch and Steve Waggott over the stadium topic during the past 18+ months.
Depends who the bloke is and what the sentences are.
Managed to get several out of Tim Fisher, Mark Labovitch and Steve Waggott over the stadium topic during the past 18+ months.
Yes, they could have made an agreement like the council allegedly did to not print certain things.While this is all bloody obvious to us, I'm thankful that we are seeing a bit more of this from the telegraph, we all know this and I suspect many people here know more than this "expert" on the financials and viability of a new stadium for ccfc but we are a small subset of the people of Coventry and in my experience there is a huge amount of misinformed people who have gotten much of their information from reading ccfc produced spin articles in the telegraph, this sort of thing is very informative to those people.
I honestly think its a disgrace that sisu have managed to put out so much spin about the new stadium with only a tiny amount of challenge from the media, lets not criticise when they do challenge.
I just find the telegraph are always finding a stick to beat the club with. Like lordsummerisle said "Football expert says that CCFC not attractive to buyers unless it owns it's own ground". it could of been portrayed completely different, but i suppose they have to keep on kicking the club while we are down
The cet obviously knew this the other day when they first spoke to him, why wait until the day before a game to publish it?
Did they not like the fact we are on a bit of a run?
I just find the telegraph are always finding a stick to beat the club with. Like lordsummerisle said "Football expert says that CCFC not attractive to buyers unless it owns it's own ground". it could of been portrayed completely different, but i suppose they have to keep on kicking the club while we are down
And what would you say if they reported it the day after our last game? 'The fookers couldn't wait and had to put a downer on our win'
I'd say if that was when the news was broken and that is when the interview was done then fair enough. Rather than splitting it up into two articles and then waiting a few days.
Your headline could have been:
"Football expert says that CCFC not attractive to buyers unless it owns it's own ground".
How many stories can we get out of a sentence off a random bloke.
Non time-sensitive content is regularly held by news outlets for days after interviews have taken place. It's a way of ensuring we have content everyday, especially when people are away from work - like I am today.
Weekly newspapers make a living out of holding content.
I think you mean how many "clicks"?
Weekly newspapers make a living out of holding content.
Like when councils allegedly don't want things to be printed?
Why not put out a "get behind the sky blues" type story to get a bit of hype about the club to get people down there supporting the team?
Yep. We're in the business of attracting readers. That means getting as many interesting stories as possible out of any given opportunity. It's not a secret.
Like when councils allegedly don't want things to be printed?
Why not put out a "get behind the sky blues" type story to get a bit of hype about the club to get people down there supporting the team? Doesn't have to be "support sisu" it should be "support your football team".
What makes a story 'interesting' is the angle it's presented with.
Or did you only ask questions to which you would get the desired answers?
This isn't the only CCFC story we've written this week, and it won't be the last. The press conference is happening now, I'm sure something positive will come out of that.
But should we not print things that are perceived to be negative?
It sounds like what you're implying we should do is also what you're accusing us of doing in relation to the council... which is nonsense by the way, it's certainly never happened since I've been at the paper.
It sounds like what you're implying we should do is also what you're accusing us of doing in relation to the council... which is nonsense by the way, it's certainly never happened since I've been at the paper.
Has nobody at the CET picked up on Tony Mowbray's dig at the pitch after the game the other night? Was quite blatant wasn't it? The playing surface has been a biggish talking point at the Ricoh.
I think it should be the news, as it is, as it happens. Whether it is negative or positive it should be here is the news, these are the facts without any spin or bias. Rather than holding onto it for a few days and then "dropping it in".
The "news" about the stadium was held onto for a few days until the day before a game while we are on a decent run? Will that put people off going? I couldn't give a shit if you catch Tim Fisher and Waggot coming out of a brothel with "talc" all over their faces in terms of news,but this sort of thing could put people going and feeling good about the "club" (not SISU) couldn't it?
There was one the other day about Ricketts going to be Mowbray's first signing, completely forgetting his actual first signing.
NICK talks Nonsense shocker..!!!!
Come on Simon, stop peddling old news. We've known for ages Nick talks nonsense.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?