H
I think he's good at his job to be honest, but he has got a shit job. Talks sense and apparently did a lot of wheeling and dealing when Charlton were in trouble to keep them going
What exactly is his job buddy?
What exactly is his job buddy?
Charlton Fan said:So planning a new stadium not in Coventry. Doesn't sound ideal for the fans on the face of it.
"Steve Waggott, Coventry City FC's development director, said owning its own ground was "key to the long-term future of the club" and would generate "activity and income"."
Given there is already a large ground (the Ricoh) in Coventry how much activity and income will be generated by the new ground?
"Mr Labovitch said the Football League was satisfied the club had the funds to build a new stadium.
"The stadium that is saddled with a huge amount of debt that is really unsustainable is the Ricoh," he said."
Yet the club don't own the Ricoh and therefore the debt related to the Ricoh is not theirs. But if they build another ground, the related debt will be theirs.
Perhaps somebody will make some money from property deals relating to the new ground. Wonder if it will be Coventry City FC.
Putting it as simple as possible, Steve Waggott is the other cheek of the same backside and part and parcel of decisions such as moving 35 miles away to play home games.
I'm not sure he has any say in that side of things.
So you are saying a Director of the company (Otium Entertainment Ltd trading as Coventry City Football Club) has no influence... LOL
So you are saying a Director of the company (Otium Entertainment Ltd trading as Coventry City Football Club) has no influence... LOL
Thought he was development director? You obviously know his role better though so please enlighten.
His appointment is a matter of public record & can be seen on the Companies House website.
Just go here http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk//wcframe?name=accessCompanyInfo look up OTIUM Entertainment and you'll find a record under the Order information on this company link..
He never bullshits. He always tells it how he is and he just does his job. If SISU left, which I fucking hope is soon, I honestly wouldn't mind keeping Waggott on
I thought it was Joy who called the shots? Or has that changed again?
I thought it was Joy who called the shots? Or has that changed again?
It's anyone employed by sisu for some.
Was'nt he partly responsible for some of the crap signings the club have made over the last couple of seasons.:thinking about:
Was'nt he partly responsible for some of the crap signings the club have made over the last couple of seasons.:thinking about:
I think he handles business side of transfers rather than identifying targets.
So he is the one responsible for loans rather than signings, short term contracts ratheor than long term, persuading players to stay and the one to make sure the manager gets the targets he wants?
So he is the one responsible for loans rather than signings, short term contracts rather than long term, persuading players to stay and the one to make sure the manager gets the targets he wants?
I would have thought so, yes. Will be working within a budget from above presumably.
So all the talk from Joy about strengthening in January when interviewed was more work in the gym?
You realise it's still January right?
Yes but wouldn't it be a novel idea to actually sign the players you want sooner rather than later. Firstly it stops them going elsewhere, secondly you have a player you want with time to settle, then it stops any lame excuse of we were caught out in the transfer market, after that you have cover if a player stays and lastly Sisu may come out with a modicum of credit for showing a little ambition. I'll still think Sisu are a shower of shite but at least we have the players we want rather than the players no one else wants.
Haven't we signed a couple of players?
Depends if the players in are better than the ones gone out doesn't it?
We may have targets who weren't available at the beginning of the month, or waiting to see what other interest can be flushed out over a month rather than taking first offer on January 1st.
We don't know.
We do know that signing players because of a clamour from fans that we need to often doesn't end well.
So what if a club are waiting to see if they can bring in a replacement before they let a player go?January is the month business is done. Everybody is available in January, Whether it's the first or the last day of the month, hence the transfer window being January. Lets not kid ourselves, all the flushing is done before January by greedy parasites like agents and alike.
One final thing, Sisu have learned their lesson in clamours from fans, otherwise we would be playing at the Ricoh.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?