Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Millwall ratings (5 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Feb 14, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

The Philosopher

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #71
CITY’S 45 🇯🇲 said:
Can we all just appreciate how good our number 45 is
Click to expand...
Yes Casey. He’s very good.
 
Reactions: Londonccfcfan

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #72
CITY’S 45 🇯🇲 said:
Can we all just appreciate how good our number 45 is
Click to expand...

Was very good last night , his best city performance ?
 
Reactions: thekidfromstrettoncamp, Earlsdon_Skyblue1, Chip Batch and 1 other person
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #73
Evo1883 said:
Interesting Robins put allen in a select few after the match who he thought played really well .. the lad must be doing what Robins is asking , we know when a player does his own things , Robins usually pulls them out
Click to expand...
tbf I tend to ignore managers after a game - maybe Robins feels he needed a boost after he'd accidentally browsed this board after all.

And I won't comment about his performance yesterday, good or bad, as I didn't see it.

But it is fair to say different players are in the team for different reasons.

As an aside, glad if Palmer could influence a game for 90 minutes mind you, as people have suggested. Lets hope that's the trend going forward and he can maximise the talents he has.
 
Reactions: Evo1883

Cobi Jones's Dreads

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #74
Wilson 7
Cuffy 8
Mcnally 7
Fadz 8
Doyle 7
Bidwell 6
Eccles 6
Hamer 7
Allen 4
Palmer 9
Gyokeres 8
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #75
stupot07 said:
Robins disagrees

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yes he described his performance as brillliant
 
Reactions: stupot07 and PVA

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #76
I think 6 for Allen is fair.

He was the weakest player I felt, but no-one had a bad game. He just had that one chance where he should have shot and was out-muscled a couple of times. Besides that, I thought he did okay.
 
Reactions: Londonccfcfan, stupot07 and oakey

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #77
In the 1st 30 seconds, Allen played a great one two with cuffy, setting the ball on a plate for cuffy to cross from the byline, ended up with eccles shooting and getting a corner I think.

in the match thread, not a mention.

1st pass he puts not quite right, lots of posts saying he’s shit and does nothing for the team……

when Millwall were attacking, who’s chasing back to cover the wing backs, Allen. When we have a break, who’s busting a gut to get in the area, Allen. When they were starting to play out from the back, who’s covering their wing backs to block them moving forward, Allen. His work rate is unbelievable, but according to the ”experts“ on here, he adds nothing to the team.

if we have designs on the top 6, we will need improvement in quite a few positions, including Allen’s, but not seeing what he provides to the team is either blindness or ignorance of the game.

I’m on Mark Robins side in this…
 
Reactions: ovduk78, MalcSB, Blake and 7 others

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #78
olderskyblue said:
In the 1st 30 seconds, Allen played a great one two with cuffy, setting the ball on a plate for cuffy to cross from the byline, ended up with eccles shooting and getting a corner I think.

in the match thread, not a mention.

1st pass he puts not quite right, lots of posts saying he’s shit and does nothing for the team……

when Millwall were attacking, who’s chasing back to cover the wing backs, Allen. When we have a break, who’s busting a gut to get in the area, Allen. When they were starting to play out from the back, who’s covering their wing backs to block them moving forward, Allen. His work rate is unbelievable, but according to the ”experts“ on here, he adds nothing to the team.

if we have designs on the top 6, we will need improvement in quite a few positions, including Allen’s, but not seeing what he provides to the team is either blindness or ignorance of the game.

I’m on Mark Robins side in this…
Click to expand...
I think "brilliant" is pushing it though.

His energy certainly did help us last night .
 

Julie SBA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #79
I thought it was a really good performance last night, maybe slightly exaggerated by just how poor Millwall were.
BNC was on it for sure but they didn't really ask any questions of him defensively. A good confidence building performance from him though. Probably should have been subbed earlier than he was as he was clearly getting tired again

Vik as immense, hes just so powerful and loves rolling defenders which he does so well.
Palmer had his best game too, adds a lot of physicality which between him and Vik must be terrifying to defend against.

I thought Eccles and Allen were pretty average, Bidwell was below par and unadventurous, but can't complain too much as we won and deservedly so.
 

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #80
Otis said:
I think "brilliant" is pushing it though.

His energy certainly did help us last night .
Click to expand...
Don’t think I said brilliant… but agree, that would be pushing it…
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #81
olderskyblue said:
In the 1st 30 seconds, Allen played a great one two with cuffy, setting the ball on a plate for cuffy to cross from the byline, ended up with eccles shooting and getting a corner I think.

in the match thread, not a mention.

1st pass he puts not quite right, lots of posts saying he’s shit and does nothing for the team……

when Millwall were attacking, who’s chasing back to cover the wing backs, Allen. When we have a break, who’s busting a gut to get in the area, Allen. When they were starting to play out from the back, who’s covering their wing backs to block them moving forward, Allen. His work rate is unbelievable, but according to the ”experts“ on here, he adds nothing to the team.

if we have designs on the top 6, we will need improvement in quite a few positions, including Allen’s, but not seeing what he provides to the team is either blindness or ignorance of the game.

I’m on Mark Robins side in this…
Click to expand...

But absolutely no one is denying his work rate is excellent. That's not the point anyone is making.
 
Reactions: Chip Batch

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #82
PVA said:
But absolutely no one is denying his work rate is excellent. That's not the point anyone is making.
Click to expand...
Constantly saying he’s shit, and adds nothing to the team? Regular comments on here.

Do you go along with the thought that ”he runs around a lot” is of no value to the team, as others do?
 
Reactions: stupot07
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #83
olderskyblue said:
Constantly saying he’s shit, and adds nothing to the team? Regular comments on here.

Do you go along with the thought that ”he runs around a lot” is of no value to the team, as others do?
Click to expand...

I made a post earlier in the thread where I explained my position. Which essentially is that running around a lot and pressing should be a given, we need more on top of that.

He made 30 yards of forward passes last night, Hamer and Palmer made almost 500 yards between them. I don't really care how much pressing he does, 30 yards of progressive passes is not good enough for an attacking midfielder.

The other midfielders press and contribute in other ways. Allen's great at pressing but severely lacking elsewhere.
 
Reactions: Chip Batch, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Fergusons_Beard

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #84
PVA said:
I made a post earlier in the thread where I explained my position. Which essentially is that running around a lot and pressing should be a given, we need more on top of that.

He made 30 yards of forward passes last night, Hamer and Palmer made almost 500 yards between them. I don't really care how much pressing he does, 30 yards of progressive passes is not good enough for an attacking midfielder.

The other midfielders press and contribute in other ways. Allen's great at pressing but severely lacking elsewhere.
Click to expand...
Well, Mark Robins and I disagree with you…
 
Reactions: oakey
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #85
olderskyblue said:
Well, Mark Robins and I disagree with you…
Click to expand...

You're welcome to your opinion

Mark Robins doesn't have much choice but to play him. As I have said, if O'Hare was fit then I am quite sure Allen would be mostly on the bench. He'd certainly still start some games, because he absolutely has a role to play, but O'Hare and Palmer would be the first choice pairing.
 
Reactions: Grendel and Fergusons_Beard

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #86
olderskyblue said:
Don’t think I said brilliant… but agree, that would be pushing it…
Click to expand...
Didn't Robins say that?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #87
PVA said:
Mark Robins doesn't have much choice but to play him
Click to expand...
Not true though. Just the other game he decided he was the better option than either Eccles or Palmer. He's signed Maguire who could play there.

He's also the one who plays just about every game this season, unlike many of the others. The fact he's ended up Captain would be madness if he was considered in just because of injuries.

No doubt at some stage he'll get a rest, but it'll be that rather than being dropped.
 
Reactions: stupot07, MusicDating and oakey

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #88
PVA said:
Of course running is important.

But at this level you need more than just running and pressing. That should be a given, you still need to provide more than that.

30 yards of forward passes and 20 yards of progressive carries (both the lowest in the team) is simply not acceptable for an attacking midfielder in my opinion and no amount of pressing is going to change my mind.

Injuries and lack of funds mean he has to start, I get that. But if O'Hare was fit right now then Allen would be on the bench.

As I've said before, I'm not hating on the guy. He does some things really well and I cannot fault his effort and commitment, and he has a role to play, but we need more than that and unfortunately he's just not technically good enough to be a starting attacking midfielder in a team that has playoff ambitions.
Click to expand...
Fortunately the team isn't picked on what you'd like the players to do.

Allen has started every game but one. Robins clearly sees him as an integral part of the way we play.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #89
MusicDating said:
Fortunately the team isn't picked on what you'd like the players to do.

Allen has started every game but one. Robins clearly sees him as an integral part of the way we play.
Click to expand...
He'd probably play less if everybody was fit, but that also might help him keep up his best level of performance rather than having to play through peaks and troughs. The others have had that opportunity after all.
 
Reactions: PVA
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #90
Deleted member 5849 said:
Not true though. Just the other game he decided he was the better option than either Eccles or Palmer. He's signed Maguire who could play there.

He's also the one who plays just about every game this season, unlike many of the others. The fact he's ended up Captain would be madness if he was considered in just because of injuries.

No doubt at some stage he'll get a rest, but it'll be that rather than being dropped.
Click to expand...

Liam Kelly is club captain so I don't think that particularly theory holds much value I'm afraid!

If O'Hare is fit then him and Palmer would be first choice and absolutely nothing will change my mind on that. It would be absurd to sign Palmer on big wages and have him on the bench behind Allen.

I think the vast majority on this forum agree with me.
 
Reactions: Chip Batch and MusicDating
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #91
Deleted member 5849 said:
He'd probably play less if everybody was fit, but that also might help him keep up his best level of performance rather than having to play through peaks and troughs. The others have had that opportunity after all.
Click to expand...

I agree with you there
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #92
PVA said:
Liam Kelly is club captain so I don't think that particularly theory holds much value I'm afraid!

If O'Hare is fit then him and Palmer would be first choice and absolutely nothing will change my mind on that. It would be absurd to sign Palmer on big wages and have him on the bench behind Allen.

I think the vast majority on this forum agree with me.
Click to expand...
He's club captain and was made Captain of the team when considered integral to it

If absurd, why did Robins want to do just that only at the weekend?

Last season, the majority decided he was good...
 
Last edited by a moderator: Feb 15, 2023

Fergusons_Beard

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #93
As soon as McGuire gets up to full fitness he’ll play more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #94
Deleted member 5849 said:
If absurd, why did Robins want to do just that only at the weekend?
Click to expand...

I meant long term and when O'Hare was fit. Of course Allen would still start some games ahead of Palmer for various reasons.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #95
Fergusons_Beard said:
As soon as McGuire gets up to full fitness he’ll play more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

He won't if nobody can spell his name on the team sheet
 
Reactions: stupot07 and Brighton Sky Blue
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #96
PVA said:
I meant long term and when O'Hare was fit. Of course Allen would still start some games ahead of Palmer for various reasons.
Click to expand...
So why conclude he's behind Palmer when the evidence is if anything it's the reverse? Why conclude Allen is a reserve but not Palmer, while accepting at the same time there are occasions Allen will play ahead of Palmer?
 
Reactions: oakey and stupot07

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #97
Evo1883 said:
Interesting Robins put allen in a select few after the match who he thought played really well .. the lad must be doing what Robins is asking , we know when a player does his own things , Robins usually pulls them out
Click to expand...
So he's literally just being asked to run around and that's it?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #98
stupot07 said:
The 4's and 5's for Allen are ridiculous. Every single player played their part yesterday. If any of our players had been a 4 or a 5 we wouldn't have won the match. It was a great team performance.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That’s nonsense, of course a team can carry a bad performance and win, just like we can lose and have someone play a blinder.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #99
olderskyblue said:
when Millwall were attacking, who’s chasing back to cover the wing backs, Allen. When we have a break, who’s busting a gut to get in the area, Allen.
Click to expand...
He's chasing back but not challenging. He's busting a gut to get forward but slows an attack down when he gets the ball. I appreciate that he works hard, but too often it's not enough.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #100
Otis said:
I think "brilliant" is pushing it though.

His energy certainly did help us last night .
Click to expand...

This is such a myth. His positioning and running is bad more than it’s good. He’s never in position to receive the ball, he’s almost always in no man’s land when defending, he doesn’t cut off passing options and is mostly passed around or just ran past as if he’s not there. He tears about the place from one player to another like a school kid but he has so little impact on the game. And people will find one pass he made in 90 mins to claim that’s OK while harping on that Palmer doesn’t impact every minute of the 90.

Fact is we’ve got no one else. Maguire is clearly crap and Robins is reluctant to play two even when Godden is fit.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #101
PVA said:
Liam Kelly is club captain so I don't think that particularly theory holds much value I'm afraid!

If O'Hare is fit then him and Palmer would be first choice and absolutely nothing will change my mind on that. It would be absurd to sign Palmer on big wages and have him on the bench behind Allen.

I think the vast majority on this forum agree with me.
Click to expand...
We’re not trying to change your mind, we’re trying to educate you

Shmmeee is a lost cause, but we thought you were worth spending a little extra effort on…
 
Reactions: Grendel and stupot07

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #102
shmmeee said:
This is such a myth. His positioning and running is bad more than it’s good. He’s never in position to receive the ball, he’s almost always in no man’s land when defending, he doesn’t cut off passing options and is mostly passed around or just ran past as if he’s not there. He tears about the place from one player to another like a school kid but he has so little impact on the game. And people will find one pass he made in 90 mins to claim that’s OK while harping on that Palmer doesn’t impact every minute of the 90.

Fact is we’ve got no one else. Maguire is clearly crap and Robins is reluctant to play two even when Godden is fit.
Click to expand...

Maguire is clearly crap? Based on what?
 
Reactions: skybluegod

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #103
PVA said:
You're welcome to your opinion

Mark Robins doesn't have much choice but to play him. As I have said, if O'Hare was fit then I am quite sure Allen would be mostly on the bench. He'd certainly still start some games, because he absolutely has a role to play, but O'Hare and Palmer would be the first choice pairing.
Click to expand...

why didn’t they play more than what 2 games when o hare was fit?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #104
olderskyblue said:
We’re not trying to change your mind, we’re trying to educate you

Shmmeee is a lost cause, but we thought you were worth spending a little extra effort on…
Click to expand...

his posting history on Allen shows he made his mind up years ago - 3 years ago as an example “Allen has zero technical ability”
 
Reactions: olderskyblue
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 15, 2023
  • #105
Grendel said:
why didn’t they play more than what 2 games when o hare was fit?
Click to expand...

There were probably about 2 or 3 games when they were both fully fit.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?