Grendel
Well-Known Member
Using words like corrupt is very ill advised - quite an extraordinary outburst really.
It used the word 'corrupt'. That's not insignificant. The difference between Facebook and here is that Mark Zuckerberg has a net worth in the region of $30 billion; whereas I don't think Nick has.
And if there's one thing I've learned over the years, is that there's less justice in the world when your opposer has deeper pockets than you
Look, it's not fair on administrators of this board to post fare such as that. Their responsibility for your errant thoughts are a well-documented issue on here, and you should have more respect for their livelihood then to post lines that could get them into hot water
She did make a complete change in her stance after meeting with Joy Seppala.
She has not delivered any compelling evidence to explain the about-turn, so what was it that caused her to change her mind.
She did make a complete change in her stance after meeting with Joy Seppala.
She has not delivered any compelling evidence to explain the about-turn, so what was it that caused her to change her mind.
So someone with something to gain from our situation makes a statement carefully not quite alleging something dodgy has happened. Sounds normal in our case to me.
So someone with something to gain from our situation makes a statement carefully not quite alleging something dodgy has happened. Sounds normal in our case to me.
What does she have to gain?
learn what a question mark is dear.
I thought she was standing for election as an MEP again.What does she have to gain?
I think you'll find that does little to diminish the nature of the words that proceed it. Have a read, eh?
What's to gain from it? Really? How will making a speech in the European Parliament buy her votes? Who from?
has anyone ever seen Ms Sinclair and Ms Seppela in the same room ?
just asking
Nothing to see here it seems. Council response will be up online at Coventry Telegraph shortly.
Sounds like whoever answered the initial FOI request made a mistake.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Perhaps she was given an overview of the JR case against the council.
That is the thing, most people who seem to meet with them seem to come out different people.
Yes SISU could be trying to "mute" them and say shut up else we sue you, but for them to come out and openly have a different opinion. There must be something good they have seen?
If she hasn't seen that as yet, why not wait until the JR? t's soon eough, isn't it?
Yeah - maybe. But equally, she'd have to have seen an overview of the defence before taking such a stance. A balanced view, as it were. If she hasn't seen that as yet, why not wait until the JR? t's soon eough, isn't it?
If the council are to blame, then we need to see this in a court of law; with both sides aired and all facts laid out. In fact we should al be looking forward to it, irrespective of leaning to any party in this mess, as otherwise we're arguing blind.
I have a view. You have a view. Who's right or wrong, who knows? If it's me, I'll readily acknowledge such. As I'm sure you'd do in return. If we all genuinely care for CCFC, then any party that's putting self-interest or gain over the club should be our common enemy.
With the JR so close, I don't like hate idea of waters being muddied. If Ms Sinclaire has a view or material, then surely that's where she should be adding the weight of her evidence? Why take this route?
are you scared of everything? man up
? symbolises a question. the word corrupt is part of that question.
are they? time will tell.
The thing is, I guess it depends how different. If 2 people replied then they could have meant the same thing but worded it differently rather than a generic response.
Hard to tell without seeing the question / answer.
If one replied saying "We used it for the Ricoh" and the other said "We gave it to orphans in Africa" then it is a bit dodgy.
Yes, you have view but if you then had a meeting with SISU and came out with the opposite view. It would suggest you had seen something good or had a gun to your head.
Yes, you have view but if you then had a meeting with SISU and came out with the opposite view. It would suggest you had seen something good or had a gun to your head.
Yes, you have view but if you then had a meeting with SISU and came out with the opposite view. It would suggest you had seen something good or had a gun to your head.
I thought she was standing for election as an MEP again.
Or a big fat brown envelope ?
MMM will be all over your ass!
Votes and popularity I guess but surely she would know she is being "against the grain". The same as the MP's who go against SISU that are praised I guess.
Not 'man up' try 'wising up'. In law, just because you follow a defamatory statement with a question doesn't make it invisible.
You typed 'corrupt council sink to a new low?'. What does the question pertain to? It seems to state that the council being corrupt is a fact, whereas the 'new low' is the element in question. Suddenly, the statement's not so innocent, is it?
And you can get into as much trouble as you like - you just shouldn't include this board's administrators in your campaign. Start up your own board, type it there, and then you'd really be 'maning up'. I'll wait, shall I?
So how does attacking the council on an issue that we are told everyone but a handful support them on makes it populist? Surely the strategy would be to attack sisu and lobby parliament against them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?