Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Goal line technology sensible nothing else is
McGoldrick was NOT offside... (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter PVA
- Start date
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
A line has to be drawn and goals (over the line or not?) and offsides should be sorted out first. E.g. In rugby, the TMO don't tell the ref if it was offside or not etc.
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
Maybe have more officials dedicated to solely determining weather a player was offside, so hopefully any human error will be weeded out by having more officials
Maybe have a room of officials which have a video stream into a tv monitor of the pitch (not sure how they would do this as would need good camera angles to see down the backline properly , maybe fit the lino running the line with some sort of camera device?)
Each official has a buzzer device of some sort, lets say we have 5 officials. When 3 of these officials buzzed with in say a 2 second time gap, the referee or lino on the touchline would get a notification through his ear piece that an offside has been called
So if 1 or 2 of them made a bad call and buzzed incorrectly then an offside wouldn't be called
Ok, I know it sounds a bit daft. Shoot me down fellas
Maybe have a room of officials which have a video stream into a tv monitor of the pitch (not sure how they would do this as would need good camera angles to see down the backline properly , maybe fit the lino running the line with some sort of camera device?)
Each official has a buzzer device of some sort, lets say we have 5 officials. When 3 of these officials buzzed with in say a 2 second time gap, the referee or lino on the touchline would get a notification through his ear piece that an offside has been called
So if 1 or 2 of them made a bad call and buzzed incorrectly then an offside wouldn't be called
Ok, I know it sounds a bit daft. Shoot me down fellas
Astute
Well-Known Member
One question.
Who is going to pay for it all and what level of football do we take it to? We can't even afford the rent
SkyBlue_Bear83
Well-Known Member
What ever level of football can afford it and what stadiums can accommodate it, same question would apply to goal line technology surelyOne question.
Who is going to pay for it all and what level of football do we take it to? We can't even afford the rent
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
One question.
Who is going to pay for it all and what level of football do we take it to? We can't even afford the rent
One of 2 options:
1. Make the technology a mandatory part of FL/PL membership.
2. Funding from the FA/FIFA/UEFA.
Astute
Well-Known Member
Could us or Sheff Utd afford it?
Could clubs in the same division that only get 3k to 4k afford it?
Astute
Well-Known Member
Astute
Well-Known Member
stupot07
Well-Known Member
Yeah we wouldn't have this thread for starters.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
And take the money from their backhanders away from them?
Andy Murray's selling it now?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
You clearly know nothing about cricket - the system is highly dubious actually in terms of assesing height and spin direction.
The point is the review system has to be called by one of the teams. If a team is winning at football or any other sport it will review anything if it means slowing the game down. Are you saying footballers wouldn't "take the mick"? :thinking about:
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Fair point Grendel, but whether the ball goes onto hit the stumps is just part of the decision and where it's dubious the umpire is given discretion. The better option for football would probably be the chip in the ball-no extra delay and the same accuracy.
Mucca Mad Boys
Well-Known Member
I never suggested a review system, I suggested a 'challenge system' where the challenges would challenge an offside decision in the context of a goal going in e.g. Cov score, ruled offside, we challenge (at this point the game is dead) and it is seen our player was onside, goal is given. The flip side, we score, no flag, they believe we were offside, they challenge, found we were offside, no goal. That's what I'm proposing, plain and simple. In terms of simple fouls, that will be left to the ref, like in rugby (rugby is a comparable sport, as it is fast flowing, for some teams anyway) and isn't as stop start as cricket or tennis, it has made rugby a better sport.
Goals is where it matters to me, whether 'over' or 'not over', 'offside', 'onside'.
Astute
Well-Known Member
Or someone that don't want to see new rules ruining the game. Goal line technology would be a big help. Anything that stops the game would not be good. A new set of tactics for managers to use to break down attacks.
I like the game how it is. Not perfect, but as long as the officials are unbiased it evens out over the season. New rules come out on occasions that do not help the game. Like now if you touch the GK it is a foul. When I first played I would go up for the ball with attackers. All part of the game. Now attackers are not allowed. Less goals are scored. No tackling from behind, not even if you get the ball. Don't even think about going in for a tackle with your studs not pointing to the ground. Sliding tackles have been outlawed. It used to be a mans game.
I like the game how it is. Not perfect, but as long as the officials are unbiased it evens out over the season. New rules come out on occasions that do not help the game. Like now if you touch the GK it is a foul. When I first played I would go up for the ball with attackers. All part of the game. Now attackers are not allowed. Less goals are scored. No tackling from behind, not even if you get the ball. Don't even think about going in for a tackle with your studs not pointing to the ground. Sliding tackles have been outlawed. It used to be a mans game.
skybluelee
Well-Known Member
You are talking utter nonsense about drs. So you don't accept that it has improved decison making in cricket?