1.5 maybe? Probably add ons as well as we seem pretty clued up in that area.
Potential mate what’s your view ? £1m ?
Reckon it'll be more like £500k rising to £2m after 20 PL appearances, with 5% sell-on share, & extra £1m if appears for England. Liverpool likely only want him as cover so we will not make much hay imoAccording to Wikipedia, Sam has played 19 games for us in League One. The rest of his early days spent playing non league.
Why do you think he's worth 3 Million?
Reckon it'll be more like £500k rising to £2m after 20 PL appearances, with 5% sell-on share, & extra £1m if appears for England. Liverpool likely only want him as cover so we will not make much hay imo
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Reckon it'll be more like £500k rising to £2m after 20 PL appearances, with 5% sell-on share, & extra £1m if appears for England. Liverpool likely only want him as cover so we will not make much hay imo
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
We might have to, to fund the rest of the squad for the season, of course.Think 1m to 1.5m is probably a realistic up front fee. I'm not sure it's worth doing at 500k.
Would still only net about 3 goals the way Robins would set upLike in an ideal world they'd give us Salah and 20 Million but that isn't happening either.
No because it's obvious O'Hare is not going to be the level of player that Maddison is. Maddisons quality was obvious and we got a price based on the size of the club willing to take that plunge. If the big boys had come in for him then then we should have asked for more.I don’t get this logic. So if Maddison is rumoured to be going for £80m someone like O’Hare is worth £16m?
We’d be lucky to get any more than what Bayliss went for, if that
We received (reported) £500,000 for BAYLISS why would we get any more for McCallumReckon it'll be more like £500k rising to £2m after 20 PL appearances, with 5% sell-on share, & extra £1m if appears for England. Liverpool likely only want him as cover so we will not make much hay imo
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
No because it's obvious O'Hare is not going to be the level of player that Maddison is. Maddisons quality was obvious and we got a price based on the size of the club willing to take that plunge. If the big boys had come in for him then then we should have asked for more.
How did Southampton get all those fees for Walcott and Bale etc? Top clubs were after them as they knew too well the potential of the player.
If Liverpool are in for him then they must think he's potentially Champions League winner quality hence we want a fair whack for that type of player. With all the money at the top of the game we need to stop being shafted.
We got £2m - it was a record fee for PrestonWe received (reported) £500,000 for BAYLISS why would we get any more for McCallum
But you’ve said McCallum has a 1 in 5 chance of becoming a £50m full back but O’Hare has no chance? When O’Hare is one of a Premier League club’s best youngsters and has played some Championship games. And McCallum has played some L1 games and some fans remain unconvinced he’s our best left back.
Maybe they are interested but more than likely like most young players their agent has contacted a low level tabloid to publish a story linking him to a big club so he gains a bigger profile. The same happened with Bayliss and Maddison - they ended up at Preston and Norwich
EXCLUSIVE: Liverpool, Everton chasing £3m Coventry midfield star
It’s a senseless argument - Liverpool have signed Gomez and Shelby and would pay nowhere near that - same with Everton and Stones
McCallum will play higher than Bayliss & O’Hare,I think Arsenal,Liverpool etc also agree as Bayliss went to the championship & looks like McCallum is about to go to premiership.But you’ve said McCallum has a 1 in 5 chance of becoming a £50m full back but O’Hare has no chance? When O’Hare is one of a Premier League club’s best youngsters and has played some Championship games. And McCallum has played some L1 games and some fans remain unconvinced he’s our best left back.
Maybe they are interested but more than likely like most young players their agent has contacted a low level tabloid to publish a story linking him to a big club so he gains a bigger profile. The same happened with Bayliss and Maddison - they ended up at Preston and Norwich
EXCLUSIVE: Liverpool, Everton chasing £3m Coventry midfield star
McCallum will play higher than Bayliss & O’Hare,I think Arsenal,Liverpool etc also agree as Bayliss went to the championship & looks like McCallum is about to go to premiership.
The same articles said Bayliss was going to Liverpool too
But you’ve said McCallum has a 1 in 5 chance of becoming a £50m full back but O’Hare has no chance? When O’Hare is one of a Premier League club’s best youngsters and has played some Championship games.But O'Hare is not currently attracting scouts of Liverpool etc. So on that basis, no.
and of course there was the story of a certain player we signed who’d been lined up by Liverpool for £5 million
McCallum will play higher than Bayliss & O’Hare,I think Arsenal,Liverpool etc also agree as Bayliss went to the championship & looks like McCallum is about to go to premiership.
@Limey so on what basis is he nearly worth 3 times of what any defender in L1 has gone for before?
A comparable player would be Mason Holgate who made 22 appearances at Barnsley in L1 (around the same as McCallum) and left for up to £2m.
None other than Liverpool want McCallum and not Holgate. They must think he's a better player.
So we let them take a player was massive potential from us for a 500k fee just because that seems fair?Like in an ideal world they'd give us Salah and 20 Million but that isn't happening either.
Liverpool aren't desperate to sign an unproven, young left back from Coventry. Look at their recent signings of a similar age..nowhere near big bucks.
Not doubting Sams ability...he's quality and I wish him well but we won't get what some are quoting.
So we let them take a player was massive potential from us for a 500k fee just because that seems fair?
No way! Top prem clubs are doing this too often. The only way to stop them doing this buy and try approach is make them pay through the nose.
Okay then, let’s believe for a minute it’s true (a similar site said the same about Bayliss)...you think we should hold out for £10m?
It's what Barry Fry etc would do and eventually settle for something in the middle. Let's call it a fair £6m if Liverpool want to take a gamble on the lad.
It's what Barry Fry etc would do and eventually settle for something in the middle. Let's call it a fair £6m if Liverpool want to take a gamble on the lad.
It's what Barry Fry etc would do and eventually settle for something in the middle. Let's call it a fair £6m if Liverpool want to take a gamble on the lad.
Dwight Gayle. 20 games. £6m to PalaceWho have they sold for £6m after a handful of games?
That was in the Championship was it not?Dwight Gayle. 20 games. £6m to Palace
Dwight Gayle. 20 games. £6m to Palace
Dwight Gayle. 20 games. £6m to Palace
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?