Think people ITK at the time he made an appearance said that it only came into affect when he starts
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Well deserved and well overdue.
Hope he has a good game.
Hope he has a good game.
How it was reported when he first made the squad.
Maddison cash delay and whether Sky Blues boss will see it
The Sky Blues are set to receive a six figure sum when Leicester City star James Maddison makes his first England start
www.coventrytelegraph.net
In excess of £100,000 wow.How it was reported when he first made the squad.
Maddison cash delay and whether Sky Blues boss will see it
The Sky Blues are set to receive a six figure sum when Leicester City star James Maddison makes his first England startwww.coventrytelegraph.net
It still rankles with me that we were in such a bad state that we couldn't achieve anything like Maddison's obvious (to most) potential value, or keep him longer and build around him. At that time we had been turned into a small town club run by charlatans.
Don't know about that, have reliable numbers ever been made public? Even if it's true, the money only went into keeping us afloat in the absence of meaningful investment.
Playing very well and making chances, still not sure what Henderson adds to the side, always backwards and sideways
We haven’t sisu might have.
He's come on leaps and bounds.
Remember how absolutely shite he was when we loaned him back from Norwich ?
Remember how absolutely shite he was when we loaned him back from Norwich ?
“How high” should our Charlatans have got for him?
Without the deal we’d have struggled to exist - most of our transfer kitty in robins era has been funded by the Wilson and Maddison deals
As I said, they had run us down to the point where we had to make a distressed sale on deadline day. So under those circumstances and at the time they chose to cash in, they probably got as much as they could. It doesn't make it any less annoying.
Ah I see you are pulling my plonker. Although I haven't necessarily got a plonker
I’m just quoting charlatan song titles no offenceAh I see you are pulling my plonker. Although I haven't necessarily got a plonker
One of my favourite bands.
Yeah it took me a while (the nineties were already after my timeI’m just quoting charlatan song titles no offence
One of my favourite bands.
) but then I realised you were just tellin' stories.
Daily Telegraph reporting that L****ster have put a price of £50m on Maddison. Would we get any of that?
Spurs are apparently favourites to sign him. They're years too late in making that decision IMO, when you look at some of the rubbish they've signed in the meantime.
Spurs are apparently favourites to sign him. They're years too late in making that decision IMO, when you look at some of the rubbish they've signed in the meantime.
Didnt waggot say we get add ons through hos whole career?
So say he goes for 50 million, Norwich get 10 % of that then we get 10% of the 10%?
If so 500k
I assume we’re entitled to a percentage of Norwich’s profits from any sales, so if Norwich profit from any deal then we do too.
My understanding is that we have 15% of 15% above the last purchase price. Eg bought for 20m sold for 50m profit 30m. Norwich get 15% of 30m which is 4.5m, we get 15% of that which is 675k. Would pay a decent players salary for a year or 2/3 of a Martyn Wagehog
I think so yes. Someone did say something about England caps and starting games so not sure if we got anything there or even extras for World Cup where he went but didn't play or even on appearances or titles etc almost impossible to say without seeing the actual wording, but pretty much will have come to the end of it. I think we'll have had somewhere approaching 4-5m at the end which isnt too shabby for where we were at the time.
