Nick
Administrator
I think he is meant to be a striker, always tends to play left midfield though when he comes on for us.
Not the end of the world, especially if we do bring in another striker. In the mean time, I agree with everyone else, move Lamieras over and play Murphy out wide. Swanson can move up to the bench in the mean time.
Not that I think he's ready, but where does Thomas play? I haven't seen him, but got the impression he was a number 10 as well.
There is the option to change to 4-4-2 with Tudgay replacing Maddison, JOB and Murphy / Lameiras on wings but that doesn't have the 2 sitting central players
Losing the goal scorer would be a far greater blow.
I guess vincelot could tuck behind a bit with fleck in front.
What a retarded thing to say.
No we'd defiantly have beaten Wigan - his contribution prior to be being two goals up was negligabke. Millwall were a car crash defensively and were opened up in the first half every time we attacked. If we need one specific player to unlock Crewe there are problems ahead.
One thing Madisson does nothing for is the defence and the biggest concern is once again in the last two games we are leaking goals.
He played six minutes against Walsall and we conceded two. Played the majority against Millwall and Wigan and we conceded 0.
I'm not saying he's irreplaceable, you're just making out that he has nothing to do with our good start for some reason.
So is your issue with a thread about Maddison being injured, because I assure you there would also be a couple of threads about every one of those players. But guess what, it's not any of those players that are injured so talking about if they would be missed more or not is totally pointless. This is about Maddison and he will be missed.
I think his contribution has been overated and he flatters to deceive.
Before the hysterical screechy brigade commence I am not saying it's unfortunate he is injured. However, I think we will cope
I don't believe anyone is denying this.
However, in a small squad, he will be missed.
We will see how well Murphy etc will do when they come in.
He played six minutes against Walsall and we conceded two. Played the majority against Millwall and Wigan and we conceded 0.
I'm not saying he's irreplaceable, you're just making out that he has nothing to do with our good start for some reason.
I've said the squad needs more players.
His position is one that can be covered.
Others can't. We probably will change formation in his absence.
Hopefully he won't put Armstrong on the wing, would be pointless I think.
Hopefully he won't put Armstrong on the wing, would be pointless I think.
I've said the squad needs more players.
His position is one that can be covered.
Others can't. We probably will change formation in his absence.
I think he's effective on the wing. I think Tudgay will start as the forward Lameries behind him and Armstrong wide. Worked well against Wigan
I think he's effective on the wing. I think Tudgay will start as the forward Lameries behind him and Armstrong wide. Worked well against Wigan
I'd much rather him and Tudgay up top. Tudgay is an intelligent player so could maybe set a few up and put Armstrong through who seems to be quite calm in one on ones and could do the work in the air!
It would work with Tudgay and Armstrong up top, like you say, Tudgay playing him in. It would then depend on what the midfield can supply though.
Murphy and Lamieres either side then.
Actually, losing Armstrong would be much, much worse.Devastated about this. He was literally the one player we couldnt afford to lose.
No we'd defiantly have beaten Wigan - his contribution prior to be being two goals up was negligabke. Millwall were a car crash defensively and were opened up in the first half every time we attacked. If we need one specific player to unlock Crewe there are problems ahead.
One thing Madisson does nothing for is the defence and the biggest concern is once again in the last two games we are leaking goals.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?