The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Grendel is your name Pete ?
A bit stupid of him to put his address on there.
I hope nobody sends him a shit parcel ;-)
Your right they never should have got involved.
Because we would have been homeless 10 years ago and then none of this would have happened as there would have been nothing for sisu to buy....
I seriously hope that does not happen.
Soon as you get physical you lose respect from many that support you, and add pity to the opponents argument.
More nonsense.
I do not go to Sixfields and I clearly would not go and live in Stychele.
Some of his points are valid - however he has a constant obsession with the Labour Party.
They are all as bad as each other. So get off your sisu .ar entirely to blame bullshit bandwagon
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
you are right, but sadly sooner or later he will open his mouth to the sort of person you really shouldnt
So I am equally to blame if I leave my window open and a twat comes in my house and steals something am I? I leave it up to othet people to make comparisons
All I am saying is in.my opinion we have been on a decline since we left highfield rd. Sisu are shocking but this started before they bought us.
Good try --but surely no woman would have him.:claping hands:Lost his wife to a bin man?
Are you sure he's not Grendel?
Whatever his views, i think posting his address on here whether in a quote or not is wrong!
Is that not the responsibility of the CET to allow him to remove his Details, or suggest it would be wise to remove them. It is not the job of the poster to edit the letter as published.
I do recall that he did a previous letter in which he asked for his details to be removed as he stated that he would be targeted for his views, and his attendence at Sixfields. So he does know that his views can bring him trouble, and he does know that he can send in letters with details withheld.
Why he did not, is open to debate.
The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
And just where do you think CCFC would have played their games if CCC had not stepped in ?
CET is CET, its quoted on here, If he got attacked and it was linked back to this site is that still ok?Is that not the responsibility of the CET to allow him to remove his Details, or suggest it would be wise to remove them. It is not the job of the poster to edit the letter as published.
I do recall that he did a previous letter in which he asked for his details to be removed as he stated that he would be targeted for his views, and his attendence at Sixfields. So he does know that his views can bring him trouble, and he does know that he can send in letters with details withheld.
Why he did not, is open to debate.
The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
And just where do you think CCFC would have played their games if CCC had not stepped in ?
Highfield Road. GR has since said we had the option to buy it back if the new ground hadn't gone ahead (and that he would have exercised that right), but we only have his word for that. Not that I want to get involved in this really because it has been done to death I guess. Personally I lay most of the blame at SISU's door, unquestionably, but I don't believe the council are completely blameless, there are a handful of key decisions made that haven't exactly helped the situation. Just my opinion.
CET is CET, its quoted on here, If he got attacked and it was linked back to this site is that still ok?
edit. This day n age i think it is a little irresponsible!
Agree with pretty much everything you say, following my view, I didnt mention the letter itself just his add. being posted, this is a football forum his views are related to football, repost retweet whatever, if some mong went out of his way to do something stupid based on the post here is my point, you would have to go out of your way to find his letter on the CET!If he gets attacked then the idiot that attacks him should be held responsible for their actions.
If his full name, full address, daily movements, description, photo, family, and other personal details had been posted on here, then that would be a different matter.
The information is available in the public domain. The information has been placed by himself in the public domain. He does not seem to fear that people will know his details so why should people be scared that repeating his words, that are published, would cause trouble. The information is attached to the letter that originally started this thread. If people spent the time and read the letters in the CET they would see the information. Just posting a suggestion that his letter (with an address) was in the CET would be wrong if we are to follow your belief.
I do think it is not the best thing to do. I have also always been against any form of violence and or physical personal attacks based on an opinion.
Whatever his views, i think posting his address on here whether in a quote or not is wrong!
The council have a lot to answer for though and we should never have got them involved. Said it many times. All sides are to blame.
And just where do you think CCFC would have played their games if CCC had not stepped in ?
I said we shouldnt have sold HR and got them involved in the first place. Listen I am not pro sisu at all but it annoys me when people 100% blame sisu. It takes 2 to tango (in this case 3). The club needs to own its own stadium and all revenues IMO. If I ran a business that was paying triple over the odds I wouldnt be happy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
I said we shouldnt have sold HR and got them involved in the first place. Listen I am not pro sisu at all but it annoys me when people 100% blame sisu. It takes 2 to tango (in this case 3). The club needs to own its own stadium and all revenues IMO. If I ran a business that was paying triple over the odds I wouldnt be happy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
I said we shouldnt have sold HR and got them involved in the first place. Listen I am not pro sisu at all but it annoys me when people 100% blame sisu. It takes 2 to tango (in this case 3). The club needs to own its own stadium and all revenues IMO. If I ran a business that was paying triple over the odds I wouldnt be happy.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Hold on the alternative was to pay for a stadium, without council money that would have required the club to raise £32M ( why, because the council put in £10M and took out a £22M loan, other than rent paid from 2005 to 2012 CCFC put in less than £500K, even if you take that out there is still an ~£25M in balance)
Agree with pretty much everything you say, following my view, I didnt mention the letter itself just his add. being posted, this is a football forum his views are related to football, repost retweet whatever, if some mong went out of his way to do something stupid based on the post here is my point, you would have to go out of your way to find his letter on the CET!
Guy gets attacked by a footy thug with radically opposing views to his, gets arrested n questioned, how did you find his address? It was on a football forum is his answer, I dont like it I dont agree with it. That is my opinion!
Each to their own!
A bit stupid of him to put his address on there.
I hope nobody sends him a shit parcel ;-)
It was on a football forum.
The football forum was debating a letter posted in a paper.
Read my post.
The question of the posting on the forum will be raised.
Above all the individual that attacks the letter writer would be unable to hide behind incitement as there has been none.
Really, his controversial letter really lit the nutters short fuse!
You seem to suggest that if it was not posted on the forum that no one would know about it.
At which point did i suggest that?
It seems as well that you judge the individuals on this forum as violent thugs, who don't have the intelligence to understand a newspaper website, but are capable of hanging around a street in Coventry, picking out anyone that looks like a letter writer.
Absolute bollox!
The point I am making is that you are directing you condemnation towards the wrong group, maybe contact the CET if you truely believe that someone has been placed at risk through the actions of their paper.
Im not condemning anyone, i voiced an opinion, and i stand by it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?