Latibeaudiere (14 Viewers)

[shmmeee]

Don’t get why so many people rate him. He's not “serviceable” or “decent”, every time he plays we leak goals.

Some of you lot would have persevered with Lati and Binks and we’d be nowhere near top.

“Every time he plays we leak goals” I mean this is just bollocks the one season he played the most we had one of the better defences in the division we haven’t “leaked goals” for about ten years.

 

---

[Liquid Gold]

“Every time he plays we leak goals” I mean this is just bollocks the one season he played the most we had one of the better defences in the division we haven’t “leaked goals” for about ten years.

Sorry I must have misremembered Lati, Binks and Collins throwing away points every week.

 

[fernandopartridge]

Don’t get why so many people rate him. He's not “serviceable” or “decent”, every time he plays we leak goals.

Some of you lot would have persevered with Lati and Binks and we’d be nowhere near top.

9 clean sheets in the 29 games he started last season. We only kept 14 in total. I'd say you're talking shite.

 

[Grendel]

Let me explain it to you so a child can understand.

Lats isnt getting a game, he isnt going to get a game unless we lose 2 of the 3 players ahead of him, and even then there's no guarantee that Bidwell may be asked to cover instead of lats. So he ain't getting a game!!!!

Still with me?

Now if we accept that he ain't getting a game, we would be better off selling him or loaning him, or even (as a last resort) paying up his contract so he can move on.

That would then allow us to bring in another CH to add to the squad to add depth and the much needed competition for places that Lats has failed to offer.

Do you understand now???? If not go and show this post to a grown up and ask them to explain it to you.

There's a good boy.

Add another centre half - who’d hardly get a game…

 

[fatso]

Add another centre half - who’d hardly get a game…

Honestly, its like talking to fucking morons on here.

 

[Grendel]

Honestly, its like talking to fucking morons on here.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Let me explain it to you so a child can understand.

Lats isnt getting a game, he isnt going to get a game unless we lose 2 of the 3 players ahead of him, and even then there's no guarantee that Bidwell may be asked to cover instead of lats. So he ain't getting a game!!!!

Still with me?

Now if we accept that he ain't getting a game, we would be better off selling him or loaning him, or even (as a last resort) paying up his contract so he can move on.

That would then allow us to bring in another CH to add to the squad to add depth and the much needed competition for places that Lats has failed to offer.

Do you understand now???? If not go and show this post to a grown up and ask them to explain it to you.

There's a good boy.

It’s just not a position that needs sorting in the same way the centre mid and wide attacking ones do, nothing more to it than that.