Kcic front bid to buy club (1 Viewer)

ccfcway · Jun 23, 2014

MichaelCCFC said:
Brief mention in Saturday's Sun. Imagine nationals won't deem there to be a newsworthy story until sisu hopefully reply with an in principle 'yes' (??)

View attachment 3552

so less coverage than the "fan boarders" guy ?

MichaelCCFC · Jun 23, 2014

Nick said:
Is it only about the press coverage then?

It is only about sisu's in principle response. If sisu reply with an in principle 'yes' today, how fantastic would that be!

Nick · Jun 23, 2014

MichaelCCFC said:
It is only about sisu's in principle response. If sisu reply with an in principle 'yes' today, how fantastic would that be!

I agree, it would be and if this gets us back to Coventry I will be the first to say sorry for doubting you and ask for you to have some sort of season ticket for life as well as send you a crate of your favourite beer!

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

MichaelCCFC said:
It is only about sisu's in principle response. If sisu reply with an in principle 'yes' today, how fantastic would that be!

Obviously but what are the chances according to your offer. I would say less than 10%. This isn't me having a dig just me being realistic. Some people think it's a complete non starter.

Is a response expected today then?

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

Nick said:
Is it only about the press coverage then?

Do you think there should be a media block on our story of woe?

The Gentleman · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
Obviously but what are the chances according to your offer. I would say less than 10%. This isn't me having a dig just me being realistic. Some people think it's a complete non starter.

Is a response expected today then?

Judging by everything else that happens to us I reckon 3 weeks

Nick · Jun 23, 2014

skybluetony176 said:
Do you think there should be a media block on our story of woe?

Well as it is the only thing Michael seems to talk about in this thread and the way it went straight to the CET it would make you think that it is all about the media coverage wouldn't it?

torchomatic · Jun 23, 2014

Jeez. You really are the King of Putting Words In People's Mouths.

skybluetony176 said:
Do you think there should be a media block on our story of woe?

Jack Griffin · Jun 23, 2014

AndreasB said:
Michael. Will you and MysteryBusinessMan allow people to use Sixfields Season Tickets at the Ricoh when you are in charge?

Asking for a friend.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Season tickets are issued by OTIUM, ask them.

Deleted member 5849 · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
Obviously but what are the chances according to your offer. I would say less than 10%. This isn't me having a dig just me being realistic. Some people think it's a complete non starter.

Is a response expected today then?

If his willingness to answer questions is anything like it is on here, he and Labovitch would sit in a room shouting statements at each other, and ignoring anything the other said!

Be like a Father Jack convention without the girls

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

skybluetony176 said:
Do you think there should be a media block on our story of woe?

I wouldn't suggest that's an issue but when you make an offer like this it's totally different, people start to hope that maybe just maybe something will change if all your motive was to exploit media attention against owners who you knew would say no then are people in the process who aren't going to be fond of that move, however on this occasion I think I can safely say that's not Michael's motive.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

torchomatic said:
Jeez. You really are the King of Putting Words In People's Mouths.

I asked a question. I wasn't insinuating what Nick was implying. So that title still belongs to your leader, rhe mighty grendall.

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

I still don't know why this was offered now. It makes no sense to me. In the letter the reference is made to waiting for the JR to happen before making this offer but surely the results of the JR are more important and any offer such as this one is redundant til the results. I don't understand the timing unless they know things we don't.

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

Nick said:
Well as it is the only thing Michael seems to talk about in this thread and the way it went straight to the CET it would make you think that it is all about the media coverage wouldn't it?

I note that you didn't answer my question but I'll answer yours.

Not in my opinion, it's about how sisu respond and Michael has wisely used the media to ensure that there is a response.

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
I still don't know why this was offered now. It makes no sense to me. In the letter the reference is made to waiting for the JR to happen before making this offer but surely the results of the JR are more important and any offer such as this one is redundant til the results. I don't understand the timing unless they know things we don't.

According to Sisu the JR has only been important in establishing facts, not a resolution.. In my opinion the JR should not affect negotiations.

Maybe the Judge could instruct Sisu to return the Club to the Ricoh on the proviso that negotiations begin over a sensible purchase?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

torchomatic · Jun 23, 2014

LOL, my leader. I really do think you are 12.

skybluetony176 said:
I asked a question. I wasn't insinuating what Nick was implying. So that title still belongs to your leader, rhe mighty grendall.

Sick Boy · Jun 23, 2014

torchomatic said:
LOL, my leader. I really do think you are 12.

I prefer the clever use of language like :Wisher,Maggot,Faggot,Labobitch,suxfids,shitfields,gredull, sicknote etc etc

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

RoboCCFC90 said:
According to Sisu the JR has only been important in establishing facts, not a resolution.. In my opinion the JR should not affect negotiations.

Maybe the Judge could instruct Sisu to return the Club to the Ricoh on the proviso that negotiations begin over a sensible purchase?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're possible right Robo but then in the letter it clearly states to waiting for the JR so why not offer it before the JR if it didn't matter?

But then to offer it Inbetween trial and verdict seems a tad silly. Offer it before or after for me.

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

Sick Boy said:
I prefer the clever use of language like :Wisher,Maggot,Faggot,Labobitch,suxfids,shitfields,gredull, sicknote etc etc

Sorry I had no idea that made up names would be offensive to you. Did your parents really christen you sick boy?

Paxman II · Jun 23, 2014

One thing about 'offers' is that normally proof of substantial funds are required within your offer so the receiving offer can be substantiated and then taken seriously. Has that been done?

Also about returning to the Ricoh while these negotiations are in play as a sign of good faith perhaps?
While I accept that would be nice from a fans point of view, it's a non starter. The stance SISU have made can not be broken in any way which would benefit ACL. Returning under such temporary status would be a benefit to the stadium. So unfortunately SISU can't accept that idea can they?
Besides, importantly ACL are the lease holders and not the owners of the stadium which SISU require some ownership of. The negotiation SISU require is with first and foremost the owners, who will in turn need inventive ways of creating ownership of the stadium that ACL have a lease on for some 40 years!
The only reason that has legs in the consideration process is because ACL are indeed the owners (Council) puppet and are still themselves half owned by the council. So the council hold the strings in the first step of negotiations for the stadium ownership if they so wish it.

This whole thing about free rent with ACL that Michael is espousing is simply a red hearing that can at best only be based on trying to get two sides to a table. The underbelly of the problem is that which I outlined above. Perhaps Michael and his 'investors' should seek to approach the council with a view to ownership of the stadium for the football club and check on the response he gets there?

Grendel · Jun 23, 2014

skybluetony176 said:
Sorry I had no idea that made up names would be offensive to you. Did your parents really christen you sick boy?

They aren't offensive.

Just pathetic and embarrasing.

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

torchomatic said:
LOL, my leader. I really do think you are 12.

Says the person who doesn't know what a question mark means. I did that in primary school.

skybluetony176 · Jun 23, 2014

Grendel said:
They aren't offensive.

Just pathetic and embarrasing.

Where you christened grendel or is that just your made up pathetic and embarrassing name?

covcity4life · Jun 23, 2014

has there been any progress on this over weekend?

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

It looks as if CCFC will not be responding to the KCIC offer at this moment in time, per Simon Gilbert.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

covcity4life · Jun 23, 2014

hopefully something can happen after JR verdict

i really really wanna watch footie at ricoh again...and not leicester reserves.

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

RoboCCFC90 said:
It looks as if CCFC will not be responding to the KCIC offer at this moment in time, per Simon Gilbert.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not rules out I see.

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
Not rules out I see.

I am sure the Club will comment when it suits them, whether the intention was there or not a card has been played here and the Club need to consider this offer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Grendel · Jun 23, 2014

skybluetony176 said:
Where you christened grendel or is that just your made up pathetic and embarrassing name?

No I was christened Grendull but prefer Grendel

Moff · Jun 23, 2014

skybluetony176 said:
Where you christened grendel or is that just your made up pathetic and embarrassing name?

Its ironic you say that as I dont think you were christened Sky Blue Tony were you...but hey you go for it

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

RoboCCFC90 said:
I am sure the Club will comment when it suits them, whether the intention was there or not a card has been played here and the Club need to consider this offer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Judgement is handed down to parties this week or maybe tomorrow I saw so maybe then we will know more Robo?

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
Judgement is handed down to parties this week or maybe tomorrow I saw so maybe then we will know more Robo?

I wouldn't assume that 100% because anything can happen in life but I hedge my bets on it..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kingokings204 · Jun 23, 2014

RoboCCFC90 said:
I wouldn't assume that 100% because anything can happen in life but I hedge my bets on it..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice pun. Yes verdict should be tomorrow but anything is possible with this saga as we know. But typically the judgement handed week before. I think this will have a bearing on the future of ccfc myself or else why hasn't anything been sorted before hand.

RoboCCFC90 · Jun 23, 2014

Kingokings204 said:
Nice pun. Yes verdict should be tomorrow but anything is possible with this saga as we know. But typically the judgement handed week before. I think this will have a bearing on the future of ccfc myself or else why hasn't anything been sorted before hand.

I just hope irrelevant of the judgement that the Club returns home to the Ricoh ASAP.

Everything else is just a side show.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Gentleman · Jun 23, 2014

Moff said:
Its ironic you say that as I dont think you were christened Sky Blue Tony were you...but hey you go for it

Good mate of mine called his daughter Skye Blue and that was down on the birth certificate.

Kcic front bid to buy club (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

New Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Jack Griffin

Guest

Deleted member 5849

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency