Why would he? Potential to get a much bigger move both financially and football wise. Same reasons gyokeres and hamer didn't sign contracts
Chances are he won't I'm just saying his value stays higher for us if he signs a new contract. However I don't see him in the category of Hamer or Vik as a player.
I can feel a song coming on my!The screamer he score against Leeds for Preston... He was playing RB, cut in and smashed it with his left so he's strong with both feet, KKH down the left/MVE down the right
Like we were only going to get a small amount for Gyokeres and Hamer?
He would still be under contract. And he might be under contract with a club that's just got up to the prem. He is still only 24 so value can go up as well as down. A good season for us and he would be in the shop window. Only takes 2 sides to be interested.
I'm all for selling anyone at the right price as long as it gets put back into the squad. But I'm also for keeping our best players when we can.
It's unfair to use Gyokeres as an example. I would say after he signs his next contract his value will be above Hamer at present. Another good season and he will catch the eye of many more.
Lol to the tune of stealers wheels... Kaine down the left us, Milan down the right lol
So say we dont go up. His value immediately has decreased having only 12 months left. We all know money will be reinvested im not sure why anyone currently thinks differently. We all want him to stay but we have to also be realistic about when is the best time to sell, especially now we have a potential replacement in the squad
Ahh yes sure but I meant were they playing in the vids featuring KKH playing on the left.
If so what positions were they in.
.... but his value doesn't automatically decrease! The same argument was falsely made for selling Hamer and Gyokores when they had 2 years left on their contracts, when some on here were saying take £8m for Gyokores and £5m for Hamer. Instead we got an extra year's service out of 2 exceptional players, and made an extra £25m on the pair of them.
Would you accept 10m now? I wouldn't. If a good offer comes in we would need to consider it.
A player with 2 years left on a contract is worth about the same as a player with 1 year left. You just have less options on keeping the player for longer.
Yes I would. We already have his replacement and 10 mil for a full back at this level is very good money. And having 2 years left over 1 is a significant difference in value. Teams wouldn't bother bidding high for a player they could get for nothing 12 months later. If gyokeres or hamer had longer left we would have got a lot more let's be honest.
No that would represent poor business for us and fundermentally undervaluing an asset.
I disagree. It may have been a minority but it was a significant minority and a very vocal one.
No but Sisu would have sold them for that amount of money.
Imagine defending MVE for 70mins. Absolutely shattered. His number comes up on the board. You breath a sigh of relief. Thank fuck for that! Then KKH makes his first run past you at speed, its at that point you realise, you've still got 20mins of this! Oh FFS!!!!!
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Facing either of them at the start of the match or 70 mins in isn't a pleasant experience lolImagine defending MVE for 70mins. Absolutely shattered. His number comes up on the board. You breath a sigh of relief. Thank fuck for that! Then KKH makes his first run past you at speed, its at that point you realise, you've still got 20mins of this! Oh FFS!!!!!
Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
It's possible for anything to happen. We might even have plans to sell MVE but nothing happens.