Is this whole thing a Haskell Mk2? (3 Viewers)

SkyBlueCRJ

Well-Known Member
Of course but Sisu don't care about us. They only care about their return and any court case will be made much stronger when an asset with ~£80m loaded on to it is forced out of business.

It's actually a very worrying proposition that in theory CCFC going out of business could work far more in their favour with regards to their court case obsession. Especially when we all know full well how ruthless they can be.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
It's actually a very worrying proposition that in theory CCFC going out of business could work far more in their favour with regards to their court case obsession. Especially when we all know full well how ruthless they can be.
And why the efforts of fan groups should go beyond "fuck off timmy"
 

Nick

Administrator
It's actually a very worrying proposition that in theory CCFC going out of business could work far more in their favour with regards to their court case obsession. Especially when we all know full well how ruthless they can be.

It's also worrying that some of our fans would see that as a positive because "SISU would be gone".
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
No, it was raised at the trust meeting and then expanded upon by OSB.
The Albany one? There doesn't seem to be a minute of that online, only a press release which doesn't mention accounts.
 

Colin Steins Smile

Well-Known Member
By no means fact and just an observation, I will point that out first. It's not based on anything other than taking a step back and looking at things playing out.

Last time we saw ACL / Council / Haskell try to force a change of ownership and it backfired.

People have acknowledged that Wasps know full well the difficulty that they can put CCFC under and the latest thing is pointing out the accounts need to be filed so it is getting more and more obvious that it's the approach being taken. The silence towards Wasps about it is also deafening.

Have they / the council lined somebody up they want to take over and think it can be forced?

If obviously it works and we live happily ever after then great, if it doesn't and backfires again what could the potential outcome be?

At the minute the worst case is no more club.

*This isn't me saying I don't want new owners, this is me pointing out the risks and how it may backfire like it did last time.
I think we are all in danger of seeing conspiracies in every corner. There’s no criticism of the potential scenario being painted here, but I doubt there is anything in it. . I just think Wasps are emboldened by the windfall cash they’re receiving & are pissed off with our owners. So think they are okay in the short term without CCFC
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Such a shame about Haskell not taking over the club. Seemed he was really into investing and making us great again

What could of been ey!
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
I think we are all in danger of seeing conspiracies in every corner. There’s no criticism of the potential scenario being painted here, but I doubt there is anything in it. . I just think Wasps are emboldened by the windfall cash they’re receiving & are pissed off with our owners. So think they are okay in the short term without CCFC

My gut feeling is that the CCFC accounts will be delayed until after the Supreme court rule whether an appeal can be heard.

If it can't expect a 1 year deal to be signed with Wasps.

Thereafter who knows.
 

vow

Well-Known Member
Which is great if a new owner comes in and it all pays off.

prestonkh.jpg
Fook me, why is @christonabike on the left in that pic!!
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
It's also worrying that some of our fans would see that as a positive because "SISU would be gone".

Don't see them going anywhere, The potential windfall of £5M plus from sale of Wilson will see them through the end summer transfer Window.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Talking of the reset button... from what we know of Joy, do you think she’d sell the name, badge rights and effectively the clubs soul back to the fans?

I some how doubt it based on how vindictive she is. She’d keep all them locked up in a vault so nobody else makes a success
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Talking of the reset button... from what we know of Joy, do you think she’d sell the name, badge rights and effectively the clubs soul back to the fans?

I some how doubt it based on how vindictive she is. She’d keep all them locked up in a vault so nobody else makes a success
If someone will pay up for it, doubt she'd just hand it over.
 

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
Newport County fans bought theirs paid around £8000 I believe, not sure who you buy it off though if liquidated I’d assume it would be the administrator.
 

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member
Don't we always have this clamour when the accounts are due/overdue ?
 

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
Don't see them going anywhere, The potential windfall of £5M plus from sale of Wilson will see them through the end summer transfer Window.
But decisions will have had to have be made by then and who says Wilson will move on, I thought he would move in this window which I call the panic window, the summer one is different not so much rush and panic.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
A meeting to express sympathy with them like the council? Will be pleasantly surprised and happy to be wrong if there's anything more aimed at wasps from the Trust.
I didn't say it was the trust looking at it.

Can't say anymore as I am not the one organising it, I will post on here when I hear what's going on so that you can all come along and take part.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
Newport County fans bought theirs paid around £8000 I believe, not sure who you buy it off though if liquidated I’d assume it would be the administrator.
Yes they brought back the club history from the administrator.
Don't think you can buy the original name though.( what I have been told)
The badge could be changed slightly so as not the same I would have thought.
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
Actually it was they other way around. I raised it before Xmas. But no one picked up on it. Including the trust
Fair enough if that's the case, I stand corrected on the origin. The point still stands though that there wasn't a peep about it until the Trust meeting and since then it's been everywhere. Still looks suspicious.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
It's actually a very worrying proposition that in theory CCFC going out of business could work far more in their favour with regards to their court case obsession. Especially when we all know full well how ruthless they can be.
What could be just as worrying is that the tax relief on the losses of "loans" say 45m in the two companies and the preference shares of 63m which could be worth more to them than selling on. All depends on what's available and how things are set up of course.
 
Last edited:

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
Question. What exactly was the mechanism by which Haskell and co were going to force regime change? Ccfc has always been on the basis of a private limited company which means all the owner has to say and has said is no.

They couldn't force insolvency and the last administration served a particular purpose which benefited only one party at the time. Sisu were in control of the lead up and the administration

The current situation could force a change but it could just as well force liquidation if my previous post holds true. That's high risk

Everyone wants new owners if it benefits ccfc
 

Nick

Administrator
Question. What exactly was the mechanism by which Haskell and co were going to force regime change? Ccfc has always been on the basis of a private limited company which means all the owner has to say and has said is no.

They couldn't force insolvency and the last administration served a particular purpose which benefited only one party at the time. Sisu were in control of the lead up and the administration

The current situation could force a change but it could just as well force liquidation if my previous post holds true. That's high risk

Everyone wants new owners if it benefits ccfc

It was what it was pushed as at the time. ACL were trying to force a change of owner, the woman from ACL had shown Haskell around.

ACL seemed to think that was the plan, so do some of our fans.


UNITED States property tycoon Preston Haskell IV has emerged as the man waiting in the wings to swoop for Coventry City should the club be placed in administration on Friday.

The Coventry Telegraph can confirm that the American, who has a fortune estimated at $250million (£157m), is being lined up by Ricoh Arena owners ACL to take over the football club.

This could force out Mayfair-based hedge fund owner Sisu, which has ploughed more than £40m into the club and had hoped to acquire a stake in the Ricoh.

Potential American investors have been to the Ricoh Arena on two occasions, one being last week’s Colchester game, and understood to have been given a tour by ACL interim chief executive Jacky Isaac.

However, although ACL have seized the initiative to force a change of ownership, Sisu could turn the tables as the apparent end game plays out.

There are three possible scenarios, the first being that Sisu themselves could put Coventry City Ltd into administration to make sure they get their own administrator who might be deemed more sympathetic to their situation, but they would have to do it before 9.59 on Friday morning.

A second scenario could see Sisu ask for an adjournment on Friday to give them more time to contest it.

The third scenario is that the judge looks at the case and comes to the conclusion that the football club is insolvent and can’t pay its debts and puts the club into administration with immediate effect.





Reading that back, it very much does look like forced takeover attempt doesn't it?
 

NorthernWisdom

Well-Known Member
Question. What exactly was the mechanism by which Haskell and co were going to force regime change? Ccfc has always been on the basis of a private limited company which means all the owner has to say and has said is no.

They couldn't force insolvency and the last administration served a particular purpose which benefited only one party at the time. Sisu were in control of the lead up and the administration

The current situation could force a change but it could just as well force liquidation if my previous post holds true. That's high risk

Everyone wants new owners if it benefits ccfc
Last time around it's fair to say a number of parties were remarkably... naive.

You'd like to think those parties who are still around would have learned their lesson. Some? Yep, maybe they have. A couple I can think probably won't have... ;) But tbh I don't see the same flickering this time around. I see frustration, I see a desire to put an end to certain issues... but I don't see the same optimism of finding somebody to take it on. If that's learning their lesson then, well, that's all well and good.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
I know what was said by the CT... never a reliable source..... but the facts are the only entity that could control administration was sisu. So the bottom line is there might have been a desire to achieve it, there might have been plenty of empty talk.... but it wasn't going to happen unless sisu wanted it to ..... and having set things up to break the lease and distress ACL it just wasn't going to happen.

Waiting in the wings to pick up the pieces is hardly forcing a change. Makes good news print but what was the mechanism for ACL or haskwll to force that change? I think the parties miscalculated and failed to see they were never in control of what was going on

Btw just to be clear I actually think the sisu plan was very clever and very nearly worked.
 
Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
I know what was said by the CT... never a reliable source..... but the facts are the only entity that could control administration was sisu. So the bottom line is there might have been a desire to achieve it, there might have been plenty of empty talk.... but it wasn't going to happen unless sisu wanted it to ..... and having set things up to break the lease and distress ACL it just wasn't going to happen.

Btw just to be clear I actually think the sisu plan was very clever and very nearly worked.
So ACL werent showing people round and they didn't have Haskell lined up?

Maybe they were just incorrect in thinking it would work that easily or didn't expect sisu to have done the whole golden share trick.

It's definitely how it was put across at the time.
 

skybluealan

Well-Known Member
Yes they brought back the club history from the administrator.
Don't think you can buy the original name though.( what I have been told)
The badge could be changed slightly so as not the same I would have thought.
Darlington had to change their name but after 3 years applied to the league and got their original name back
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
So ACL werent showing people round and they didn't have Haskell lined up?

Maybe they were just incorrect in thinking it would work that easily or didn't expect sisu to have done the whole golden share trick.

It's definitely how it was put across at the time.

You have to stand back and look at it. Should be and is easier in hindsight. It also helped sisu to portray as under threat but my memory of it is that regime change first came in comments from Fisher. It was never going to happen and sisu had already ensured that by planning the insolvency to break the lease and protecting their position with massive losses plus the mysterious error as to which company owned what.

Or are we saying that sisu are doing the same trick again.... because that's deeply worrying. Put otium in to administration now and arvo as the biggest creditor control the process ... ie sisu do. But why pay out for an administrator ? They are costly, sisu are in control of ccfc already so to what purpose ?
 

Nick

Administrator
You have to stand back and look at it. Should be and is easier in hindsight. It also helped sisu to portray as under threat but my memory of it is that regime change first came in comments from Fisher. It was never going to happen and sisu had already ensured that by planning the insolvency to break the lease and protecting their position with massive losses plus the mysterious error as to which company owned what.

Or are we saying that sisu are doing the same trick again.... because that's deeply worrying. Put otium in to administration now and arvo as the biggest creditor control the process ... ie sisu do.

Regime change was discussed at the time before administration happened. That was the whole point of Haskell. ACL were showing him round the stadium.

Did acl know that sisu had already planned for it or is that said in hindsight after it hadn't worked?

My point is exactly that, if the plan is along the same lines with wasps. Who knows what tricks they have up their sleeve? That's the worry.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
But the point is it doesn't matter what ACL were saying or showing around. It doesn't matter what they thought or encouraged. The one party that mattered knew there was no possibility of it happening and had been working on their plan for well over a year.

Typical sisu don't look here look there. Acl, Haskell the trust ccc just made themselves look naiive
 

Nick

Administrator
But the point is it doesn't matter what ACL were saying or showing around. It doesn't matter what they thought or encouraged. The one party that mattered knew there was no possibility of it happening and had been working on their plan for well over a year
Thats my point, in hindsight sisu had already out thought ACL. ACL seemed to think they could force a change.

The worry is what plans do they have now if wasps and others try to do the same? Ccfc won't be their priority.

Did anybody expect them to have done that at the time? This time people are putting the eggs in the wasps basket. The same as they were in the ACL one.
 
Last edited:

Magwitch

Well-Known Member
Or are we saying that sisu are doing the same trick again.... because that's deeply worrying. Put otium in to administration now and arvo as the biggest creditor control the process ... ie sisu do. But why pay out for an administrator ? They are costly, sisu are in control of ccfc already so to what purpose ?[/QUOTE]
If that was to happen and Arvo took over that way would they be seen as new owners and therefore have to pass the FAs “fit and proper” test ?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top