Skyblue_CP
Well-Known Member
How some people have watched that game and concluded that Rushworth’s communication was a talking point. Wowzers.
Ipswich Ratings (12 Viewers)
- Thread starter The Philosopher
- Start date
The Philosopher
Well-Known Member
Errr….
Oggy was talking about it during the match.
“wowzers”
Are you 12?
Is Oggy not as smart as you with regards goalkeeping?
Skyblue_CP
Well-Known Member
So you’re not formulating your own opinion but that of Oggy, the goalkeeping summariser to make it seem like you know what you’re talking about, after he’s made a passing comment during an incident in the match. Makes sense. Don't get me wrong I like Wilson and think he’s brilliant to have in the dressing room. But your post is clear that you’re making an argument to bring him back and forcing the issue. The GK that would probably struggle to get on the pitch for a L1 side now regularly, over the one that is being tapped up by England. Go figure.
The Philosopher
Well-Known Member
No. Not at all. Never once said bring Wilson back in this thread; simply that he wasn’t as good technically yet was more vocal. I believe that him being vocal contributed vicariously to clean sheets.
WRT Oggy, I was replying to your suggestion that no one mentioned his lack of communication. Oggy has, so I pointed that out.
“Tapped up by England”…well, Pickford is in goal and not Rushworth. Pickford yells and screams and shouts “mine”, “leave” and so on.
My point, which I’ll stick to, is that Rushworth needs to do just that; call for the ball.
Ever shouted “man on” at a match?
Have a good night.
WRT Oggy, I was replying to your suggestion that no one mentioned his lack of communication. Oggy has, so I pointed that out.
“Tapped up by England”…well, Pickford is in goal and not Rushworth. Pickford yells and screams and shouts “mine”, “leave” and so on.
My point, which I’ll stick to, is that Rushworth needs to do just that; call for the ball.
Ever shouted “man on” at a match?
Have a good night.
rob9872
Well-Known Member
I know we lost 3 nil, but the back was less of an issue for me.We went too high chasing, but I'd rather we did have a go than defend a 1-0 defeat.
Biggest issue I thought today was no width or creativity. KKH for 10 or 20 at the end with tired legs and his pace is fine, against good opposition he's not a winger. EMC on the other side didn't want to go past and looked very pedestrian. No service to Ellis. Rudoni didn't look match-fit and struggled.
Eccles was a bit understandably tentative after his booking and Grimes ran miles covering lots of ground but not as progressive with the ball as usual.
Difficult to score really so I won't. Heads definitely dropped after the Hirst decision rather than galvanise and we just seemed a little off it for whatever reason.
Ah well onto Preston.
Biggest issue I thought today was no width or creativity. KKH for 10 or 20 at the end with tired legs and his pace is fine, against good opposition he's not a winger. EMC on the other side didn't want to go past and looked very pedestrian. No service to Ellis. Rudoni didn't look match-fit and struggled.
Eccles was a bit understandably tentative after his booking and Grimes ran miles covering lots of ground but not as progressive with the ball as usual.
Difficult to score really so I won't. Heads definitely dropped after the Hirst decision rather than galvanise and we just seemed a little off it for whatever reason.
Ah well onto Preston.
Otis
Well-Known Member
Missing BTA AND Saka AND Torp all at the same time, is a huge loss.
SleepyGinger
Well-Known Member
Thought Dasilva was good today
rob9872
Well-Known Member
I've not heard any interviews yet, was either Saka or Torp a late change? I assumed so as Varney was on the bench. Wonder if that upset our balance and KKH was a late replacement?
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
Torp ill apparently do quite possibly a late change