No, I'm not missing the point.
Absolutely nobody has heard whatever he said and thought "actually, he's right, I never knew this".
If you chose to ignore the things that are being done about it then sure, nothing has been done.
But Ratcliffe says there's 12 million people come in and that's what people are choosing to believe, not the above.
I've posted that several times now, it just seems to get ignored.
In the grand scheme of things it is absolutely nothing. Net migration for the last decade alone is in the millions. Illegal immigrants and criminals within that number are still largely here, and continue to arrive. The jump in percentage has basically gone from doing beyond worse than fuck all, to now effectively fuck all.
We were already at 44k in the same period under the last govt with steps put in place to increase it. I'm not disputing the figures but the increase isnt that huge and yet they're claiming this positive action from July 2024, yet everything else that's still broken we hear 'it's as a result of the last government and we've not had time to fix it'. Can't claim all the good stuff and not take responsibility for the bad. Yes it's only 18 months, but it's either all on them or not at all.Well it's a start isn't it, it's not going to be fixed overnight if the problem is as big as you say it is.
I would say that deporting criminals is a good thing, I thought you would agree but apparently not!
Well it's a start isn't it, it's not going to be fixed overnight if the problem is as big as you say it is.
I would say that deporting criminals is a good thing, I thought you would agree but apparently not!
Because your focus is about him and not the point he was making. You have even edited when quoting me.
What policy of Reforms do you think will have a bigger impact in their first 12 months in power?Most people will view that as a derisory effort on what is a very big problem.
If anyone on here was worth £17billion they would be paying any tax they don’t have to. That’s why Jimbo has that money in the first place
We it's being ignored and no attempt is being made to tackle it apart from the attempts that are being made. As has been pointed out numbers of deportations are increasing. And I will repeat this once again, just to try and get it into your head I AGREE MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE TO STOP PEOPLE ENTERING THE COUNTRY AND TO GET THOSE THAT SHOULDN'T BE HERE OUT AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE.It is being ignored. What has been done about it? You both continue to spectacularly miss the point and divert.
The people of the UK are done with the level of immigration we have seen. There has been no attempt to tackle it. If you want to continue struggling with discourse and trying to shift the blame back on the common citizen or have a go at them (like you are doing), then it eventually gets to the point where people will take things into their own hands. In this fashion, that is to vote for a pretty extreme option. We saw a similar thing with Brexit, but you still are not learning and have the audacity to say other people are not listening.
You both also keep naively saying people are lapping up Farage et al, but very few people actually care what they say other than the core message, or have much faith in them being the saviours either. It is a protest. People have had enough. You keep failing to get that. None of it else matters. You keep getting caught up on Farage or what a celebrity says, or focussing on too many specifics - most people outside of your bubbles don't give a shit about any of that. They want to see the topic sensibly discussed (which the left have continuously impaired for decades) and immigration tackled as a matter of urgency, and it has not been. As I pointed out, the reaction to Ratcliffe is prime candy and backs this up. Looking down on people doesn't help either. That does more to push people away and towards the arms of Reform.
There are a few of you on here that really have no clue what most people think and feel, so if you want to bury your heads in the sand for a bit longer then that's unfortunately on you.
And that's fine, there is (presumably!) nothing illegal about what he's doing.
But don't then moan about the state of the UK and beg for handouts from the UK government.
And also a big reason why the country is in a state. It'd be like me having more food than I could ever possibly eat but refusing to share what I have because why should I, it's mine, then complaining because other people are starving to death and stealing trying to feed themselves. It's a complete failure to see the bigger picture and rather than being a clever thing to do it's actually monumentally stupid.If anyone on here was worth £17billion they would be paying any tax they don’t have to. That’s why Jimbo has that money in the first place
You say presumably. Do you have doubts?
And also a big reason why the country is in a state. It'd be like me having more food than I could ever possibly eat but refusing to share what I have because why should I, it's mine, then complaining because other people are starving to death and stealing trying to feed themselves. It's a complete failure to see the bigger picture and rather than being a clever thing to do it's actually monumentally stupid.
I wouldn't be overly surprised if it turned out to be the case because he's an awful c**t, but I assume it is all above board and legal.
Well, yes. He's worth around £15bn. The average person in the UK is worth £275k. Worldwide average wealth is around £65k (and there will be a lot far below that).Is it refusing to share?
Well, yes. He's worth around £15bn. The average person in the UK is worth £275k. Worldwide average wealth is around £65k (and there will be a lot far below that).
There is nothing that can justify that level of discrepancy. It is purely greed (which could be defined as as an unwillingness to share)
Well, yes. He's worth around £15bn. The average person in the UK is worth £275k. Worldwide average wealth is around £65k (and there will be a lot far below that).
There is nothing that can justify that level of discrepancy. It is purely greed (which could be defined as as an unwillingness to share)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?