I apologise for saying Matty James flatters to deceive (2 Viewers)

SBAndy · Apr 15, 2021

Have we seen a James/Hamer or James/Sheaf partnership in a 352 yet?

tommy hutch legend · Apr 15, 2021

Grendel said:
Kelly will not be here - not good enough - and James will seek a better opportunity

r u a players agent

ccfcmad1 · Apr 15, 2021

Sign him up and close thread.......

cc84cov · Apr 15, 2021

ccfcmad1 said:
Sign him up and close thread.......

Get out of the sheaf deal first

Evo1883 · Apr 15, 2021

I personally think Robins will try to sign him ..

cc84cov · Apr 15, 2021

Evo1883 said:
I personally think Robins will try to sign him ..

He’s said it’s with a view to becoming permanent I think James will sign the sheaf deal will end up off

harvey098 · Apr 15, 2021

Grendel said:
To be fair you so think Max Biamou is our best forward so I guess we will leave it there

touché

cov donkey kick · Apr 15, 2021

Think robins will get him signed as he's getting more influential every game.

bawtryneal · Apr 15, 2021

Grendel said:
He’s so last year

He is carrying a thigh strain. Needs rest.

Evo1883 · Apr 15, 2021

He's looked better since we switched to the current formation that's for sure

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee · Apr 15, 2021

I don’t necessarily think he’s what we needed to sign, but he’s what I want Kelly to be. He’s so much more composed on the ball and so much more intelligent with it. Not a slate of Kelly but James is very much the higher tier of Kelly and if we’re not going on sentiment and it’s affordable the kind of player we need

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rexo87 · Apr 16, 2021

Grendel said:
lol he was really really average

Wow

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Deleted member 9744 · Apr 18, 2021

Difference between staying up and going down. Very astute signing.

procdoc · Apr 18, 2021

Deleted member 9744 said:
Difference between staying up and going down. Very astute signing.

I hope we sign him permanently

no_loyalty · Apr 18, 2021

procdoc said:
I hope we sign him permanently

He has been excellent in the last two games.

Liquid Gold · Apr 18, 2021

Starting to change my mind on him.

SBAndy · Apr 18, 2021

Probably wouldn’t go as far as to say he’s the difference between staying up and being relegated, but he looked very good again today. This is more what I was expecting.

Evo1883 · Apr 18, 2021

Brilliant today

Wyken Sky Blue · Apr 18, 2021

I said he was a bit of a poor signing but played very well today it has to be said

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk

skybluetony176 · Apr 18, 2021

This will be the first full season he’s played since Leicester were last in the championship. I think he just needed a good run in the team to settle in and rediscover that he’s actually a decent player, certainly at championship level. Which he now seems to have done.

Ccfcisparks · Apr 18, 2021

We said all along him and Kelly couldn’t play together but over the last 4 games they’ve both looked very good.

SBT · Apr 18, 2021

Anyone know our PPG in games he’s started?

PVA · Apr 18, 2021

Brilliant signing.

Flatters to deceive

Frostie · Apr 18, 2021

Ccfcisparks said:
We said all along him and Kelly couldn’t play together but over the last 4 games they’ve both looked very good.

Always liked James but yeah, was concerned about the 2 together. Think the last 2 games have shown that when we need to be more defensively sound & structured though they can work.

cov donkey kick · Apr 18, 2021

Re Kelly, I think robins must be considering him and James thinking maybe letting one go as if sheaf is a signing then 3 similar players for 1 position is a waste of budget .none of us no what terms of the sheaf deal is before anyone jumps on this

ccfc92 · Apr 18, 2021

Done very well recently, especially with Kelly.

Frostie · Apr 18, 2021

SBT said:
Anyone know our PPG in games he’s started?

19pts from 16 starts - 1.19 PPG

cc84cov · Apr 18, 2021

Frostie said:
19pts from 16 starts - 1.19 PPG

Still think sheaf offers more ?

Otis · Apr 18, 2021

cov donkey kick said:
Re Kelly, I think robins must be considering him and James thinking maybe letting one go as if sheaf is a signing then 3 similar players for 1 position is a waste of budget .none of us no what terms of the sheaf deal is before anyone jumps on this

I would prefer James to Kelly. I do like Kelly a lot, but am not convinced he is top Championship player. James is proven.

Both have had a number of injury concerns though

I don't think going with both is the way forward

Grendel · Apr 18, 2021

cc84cov said:
Still think sheaf offers more ?

we are averaging 1.15 anyway

Frostie · Apr 18, 2021

cc84cov said:
Still think sheaf offers more ?

Never said he did. I like both, would be happy if we can sign both.

Londonccfcfan · Apr 18, 2021

cov donkey kick said:
Re Kelly, I think robins must be considering him and James thinking maybe letting one go as if sheaf is a signing then 3 similar players for 1 position is a waste of budget .none of us no what terms of the sheaf deal is before anyone jumps on this

It will and should be one from James And Sheaf.

James/Kelly/Hamer. Eccles should be a back up on fringes.

Desperately need another attacking midfielder.

Brighton Sky Blue · Apr 18, 2021

Londonccfcfan said:
It will and should be one from James And Sheaf.

James/Kelly/Hamer. Eccles should be a back up on fringes.

Desperately need another attacking midfielder.

Surely we are committed to signing Sheaf at this point?

procdoc · Apr 18, 2021

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Surely we are committed to signing Sheaf at this point?

I think that is correct. I think Sheaf could be a valuable asset though

Grendel · Apr 18, 2021

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Surely we are committed to signing Sheaf at this point?

Probably he’s young and a prospect anyway

I apologise for saying Matty James flatters to deceive (2 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Deleted member 9744

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency