Wasn't a big help to AT though was he?
What was he doing biding his time?
He had 1 pre-season and 4 games with Thorn! Hardly biding his time!
My point is he was part of the set-up that did for Thorn - if Thorn was judged on that he had Shaw with him - ok we've had one good game - that's not enough top make a decision on Shaw -same as 4 games for AT wasn't enough - Shaw may well be brilliant but we would need to see a dozen games before we could make a call on him as permanent replacement - SISU haven't got the patience for that - that much is now obvious
i always thought it would be Shaw due to SSISU trying to save money. I think he could be quite good but we all got burned with Thorn when he got some initial success
My point is he was part of the set-up that did for Thorn - if Thorn was judged on that he had Shaw with him - ok we've had one good game - that's not enough top make a decision on Shaw -same as 4 games for AT wasn't enough - Shaw may well be brilliant but we would need to see a dozen games before we could make a call on him as permanent replacement - SISU haven't got the patience for that - that much is now obvious
My point is he was part of the set-up that did for Thorn - if Thorn was judged on that he had Shaw with him - ok we've had one good game - that's not enough top make a decision on Shaw -same as 4 games for AT wasn't enough - Shaw may well be brilliant but we would need to see a dozen games before we could make a call on him as permanent replacement - SISU haven't got the patience for that - that much is now obvious
Thorn wasn't sacked for the 4 games this season.
shaw was sacked as milwall asistant so he couldnt have been that good, if the new man wants to keep shaw and carsley on thats up to him but lets forget this shaw bandwagon
shaw was sacked as milwall asistant so he couldnt have been that good, if the new man wants to keep shaw and carsley on thats up to him but lets forget this shaw bandwagon
shaw was sacked as milwall asistant so he couldnt have been that good, if the new man wants to keep shaw and carsley on thats up to him but lets forget this shaw bandwagon
I believe he was you know - I think SISU have just panicked
He was sacked because Fisher could see the same pattern as last year emerging.
I can't believe for a single second that it was just because of the games this season.
If Fisher had a good handle on all this AT would have been gone long ago last season - it was obvious then it wasn't working albeit with the constraints on AT - I think he is under MASSIVE pressure from SISU and just cannot afford to let results slip for even a few games - timing of the sacking just doesn't make sense - YES AT was sacked because of last season BUT he was given another go and YES I agree Fisher could see the same pattern - so YES he was sacked because of these few games or else he would have been out
Award winning Journalist Mike Calvin gave a big endorsement regards Richard Shaw on the Keys/Gray slot on Talk Sport at about 10.50am. Apart from being a reporter he is a Millwall fan and said he had spoken to Shaw many times during his period there and has high regard for him as a football person and in his opinion has what it takes to make a good manager. Said he was reserve team manager there and was always taking players aside to try and improve them and was held with high regerd by the players.
But it wasn't just that was it. Been a number of posts on here about off the field altercations. Whatever has happened I don't know, but it seems there was something else going on too.
I think Andy thorn was stubborn.don't think he'd of taken much off Shaw or carsley anywayMy point is he was part of the set-up that did for Thorn - if Thorn was judged on that he had Shaw with him - ok we've had one good game - that's not enough top make a decision on Shaw -same as 4 games for AT wasn't enough - Shaw may well be brilliant but we would need to see a dozen games before we could make a call on him as permanent replacement - SISU haven't got the patience for that - that much is now obvious
Careful or you might be accused of being a Shaw loverI forgot we're only allowed to have the 'Wise' bandwagon
Yes. Until you can show me a direct quote, I am sure.
Made me laughWould be a Shaw Shagger.
Those opposed would be the Anti-dreadlock Brigade.
If you're pro Carsley you're a Baldist.
Careful or you might be accused of being a Shaw lover
Would be a Shaw Shagger.
Those opposed would be the Anti-Dreadlock Brigade.
If you're pro Carsley you're a Baldist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?