IF anything for the first one he's a yard offside. Second one is very tight. I very much doubt that the lino could've made an informed choice though. Must've been a lucky guess.
Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer. https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137
Unfortunately the highlight look kind to us, RCC made 1-2 good saves that aren't included. The reality is, both teams were very average and 0-0 would have been the fair result.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I still think the second is onside. Lino wasn't up with it. Having said that over the 90 a draw was the fair result. Rochdale were poor and 'bullied' us. I was surprised a) that the ref allowed so much and b) that we did nothing about it. Does Madders diving antics go against the whole team? It really looks men against boys for a lot of the game.
How many times did we test their keeper....I only remember him making a couple of saves where he had to stretch at all.
The team badly lacks confidence and the belief to take players on.
I'd say there is an argument for both, but despite what anyone says, we scored two goals, they just didn't count.
Had either gone in it 'could' have been different. We were punished at the death, but a draw overall would have been a fair result. Either way, it was a better performance than the previous two games.