Armstrong's Goal Today (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Nick
- Start date
Johnnythespider
Well-Known Member
I thought the one in the first half was close as well
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
Nick
Administrator
Was that when he hammered it over?
Silence_Is_The_Enemy
Well-Known Member
anything that was 50/50 the flag went up thought they called them off a few times they were not to ¬_¬ one of them days amazed maddison didnt get at least 1 yellow for continued diving bloody ridiculous
The Great Eastern
Well-Known Member
2nd half 'goal' was offside for sure. Not by much but they got that one right.
However, would you have faith in an officials team who couldn't even work out that their 1st half shirts of green were
actually a colour clash with Rochdale's shirts ?
However, would you have faith in an officials team who couldn't even work out that their 1st half shirts of green were
actually a colour clash with Rochdale's shirts ?
Nick
Administrator
I thought both decisions were right.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I'll watch it again, could be wrong as I only saw it at the time but it did look onside. Couldn't really see the penalty.
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
All the key decisions looked correct today, though I thought the ref seemed to slow down the play quite a bit.
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
The 1st offside goal I thought looked on.
lifeskyblue
Well-Known Member
I thought arma was onside...and the Lino was not up with play.
We should have had two penalties second half. One hands on players throat the other a blatant two handed shove in the back.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We should have had two penalties second half. One hands on players throat the other a blatant two handed shove in the back.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Johnnythespider
Well-Known Member
No, ball in from the left and side-footed into bottom corner, unless I dreamed it !!
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
That's the one Lino was well out of position.
Nick
Administrator
I completely forgot about that, hadn't the whistle already gone when he scored?
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
Highlights confirm that the first was offside, even though Armstrong tied to do a little jink to get himself onside. Second also looks offside but would need to freeze frame.
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
Fair enough
I_Saw_Shaw_Score
Well-Known Member
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on
If you freeze frame it shows ads
Ads Armstrong?
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on
If you freeze frame it shows ads
exactly....hence can't freeze frame? will look at the extended highlights tomorrow.
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
Having watched the highlights again, I'd say the second was definitely onside. All 3 officials were inconsistent bellends today although that's hardly new in this pathetic excuse of a league.
eastwoodsdustman
Well-Known Member
I was sat in line with the second one and I was sure at the time that he was onside, as were people around me.
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
Mowbray's analyst saying the second goal was onside, and the extended highlights appear to support this.
CJ_covblaze
Well-Known Member
First decision - Offside. Relects poorly on Armstrong. Especially as he can use the 22 as a guide.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224
Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224
Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
If you use the lines on the pitch as a guide it certainly looks onside.
Nick
Administrator
On there though, there is a split second where the ball has moved away from Murphy's foot
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
It was onside. The twitter photo is taken after ball contact. If you magnify the second of the photos I uploaded you'll see the white trail of the ball, confirming that the photo is taken after ball contact, at which time Armstrong is onside. Difficult decision for the RA, but there you go.
Last edited by a moderator:
stupot07
Well-Known Member
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
D
Deleted member 4439
Guest
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
In as much that is was a difficult decision, then it certainty wasn't an outrageous decision. In that the lino got it wrong, and therefore changed the game, it was a bad decision!