Armstrong's Goal Today (1 Viewer)

Nick

Administrator
It looked on side, one of their defenders (may have been right back as it was over that way) looked to be playing him on.

I think the ref and lino had a bit of a stinker, they got their pen but how their Lino didn't see their defender have Lamieries by the throat I don't know.
 

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
I thought the one in the first half was close as well

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 

Silence_Is_The_Enemy

Well-Known Member
anything that was 50/50 the flag went up thought they called them off a few times they were not to ¬_¬ one of them days amazed maddison didnt get at least 1 yellow for continued diving bloody ridiculous
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
I thought both decisions were right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

Nick

Administrator
There was one where Stokes knew he was offside so he put his hands up and stood still. Before the ball went anywhere near him he was flagging.
 

The Great Eastern

Well-Known Member
2nd half 'goal' was offside for sure. Not by much but they got that one right.

However, would you have faith in an officials team who couldn't even work out that their 1st half shirts of green were
actually a colour clash with Rochdale's shirts ?
 

Nick

Administrator
I thought both decisions were right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

I'll watch it again, could be wrong as I only saw it at the time but it did look onside. Couldn't really see the penalty.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
All the key decisions looked correct today, though I thought the ref seemed to slow down the play quite a bit.
 

lifeskyblue

Well-Known Member
I thought arma was onside...and the Lino was not up with play.
We should have had two penalties second half. One hands on players throat the other a blatant two handed shove in the back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Highlights confirm that the first was offside, even though Armstrong tied to do a little jink to get himself onside. Second also looks offside but would need to freeze frame.
 

Nick

Administrator
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on

If you freeze frame it shows ads :(
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Just watched, first was offside, second wasnt I dont think. The player by Fortune was playing him on

If you freeze frame it shows ads :(

exactly....hence can't freeze frame? will look at the extended highlights tomorrow.
 

skybluepm2

Well-Known Member
Having watched the highlights again, I'd say the second was definitely onside. All 3 officials were inconsistent bellends today although that's hardly new in this pathetic excuse of a league.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Mowbray's analyst saying the second goal was onside, and the extended highlights appear to support this.

Untitled1.jpg Untitled2.jpg
 

CJ_covblaze

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
First decision - Offside. Relects poorly on Armstrong. Especially as he can use the 22 as a guide.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444729941172224

Second decision - Offside. At first glance I thought he was at least level but after seeing it a couple of times his knee and head are ahead of the last man. The lines from the mower make it a bit clearer.
https://twitter.com/CJ_covblaze/status/706444832277979137

On there though, there is a split second where the ball has moved away from Murphy's foot
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
It was onside. The twitter photo is taken after ball contact. If you magnify the second of the photos I uploaded you'll see the white trail of the ball, confirming that the photo is taken after ball contact, at which time Armstrong is onside. Difficult decision for the RA, but there you go.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

stupot07

Well-Known Member
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
To be honest, if we can't make our minds up and have to freeze frame and 1 frame/0.1 second is the difference between looking offside or looking onside, then it really isn't that bad a decision by the linesman by the naked eye.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

In as much that is was a difficult decision, then it certainty wasn't an outrageous decision. In that the lino got it wrong, and therefore changed the game, it was a bad decision!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top