Nick
Administrator
Has Julian Grey gone? Can we have an article for that?
Blame Easter weekend, or form a conspiracy. Either way, the story is now up here:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...entry-city-agree-financial-settlement-9005886
There was no point in your waffle was there? What relevance was any of your post to the OP anyway? It's about local media manipulation.
Please point out any relevance your post had to the topic of the thread.
Your diverting the subject Tony, not me.
And no I'm not free for dinner Friday
Pressley agrees financial settlement
So we are all happy now? The spurious lies of the CT and the knee jerk reaction of all those who fell for it was wasted...... Lol.
it was expected to be cleared up latest after Easter..... The "council Telegraph" even admitted that Pressley had agreed a settlement based on the notes from the meeting - seen only during Easter. So 36 sides started by Grendel during which he insulted the CT, accused people of being council workers, liars and Wasps fans whilst taking us on a deflection tour even as far as the summit of Mount Everest........ Plus a few dramatic clashes between other posters on the way... Can't wait til something important happens ;-)
Did the announcement regarding Pressley take up the same room as the original "news" item?
Are you seriously saying their only source for any information is the SCG!
Are you saying that there was no items added on the website from Thursday to Tuesday?
Deflection tour? I never deviated from the initial topic.
Why should I? I was proved right Knob as usual.
Did the announcement regarding Pressley take up the same room as the original "news" item?
Are you seriously saying their only source for any information is the SCG!
Are you saying that there was no items added on the website from Thursday to Tuesday?
Deflection tour? I never deviated from the initial topic.
Why should I? I was proved right as usual.
Did the original news come from an SCG meeting?
Would it have appeared online if people weren't bitching on here?
It isn't really proven wrong, it was hidden away in the paper where nobody could see and then appeared days later online.
What spurious lies did CT tell?
I would say it was spurious over exaggeration myself. The point about the press in general was correct.
Which was not how Grendel Phrased it. He said something provokative to gain our attention - exactly the same as a newspaper trying to sell papers. But he lied. The CT didn't.
Turns out it was bullshit though? There was never a chance we would be wound up from it.
May as well start writing articles about us being in Europe in a couple of seasons after we win the FA cup.
Theoretically there was and if we were on a good Cup run we would also speculate ( how often did people mention the playoffs this season? ). Having to publish a non story at the end Must have been embarassing...
Turns out it was bullshit though? There was never a chance we would be wound up from it.
May as well start writing articles about us being in Europe in a couple of seasons after we win the FA cup.
If I issue a winding up order against a company that owes me money, and the Telegraph reports on it in the same way, and then the Company subsequently pays up... was the report BS, or a factual representation of what could happen?
Of course it was never going to result in being wound up, but if the threat was there was it wrong to report on it?
We have so much other information these days about everything the club or it's owners get up to, why not that?
And yes, papers sometimes exaggerate headlines.. shock horror...
Turns out it was bullshit though? There was never a chance we would be wound up from it.
May as well start writing articles about us being in Europe in a couple of seasons after we win the FA cup.
Did he actually issue a winding up order then?
The point is, it was quite clearly to scare wasn't it?
Is that the CET headline or SP saying he would take it to court if SISU never paid him? SISU must have taken him seriously as they paid him.
The headline FYI:
"Coventry City: Steven Pressley in legal threat over payout after his sacking"
What was the sub heading just underneath on the website?The headline FYI:
"Coventry City: Steven Pressley in legal threat over payout after his sacking"
What was the sub heading just underneath on the website?
Obviously it isn't front page news when an agreement is done, but obviously the point is being missed or dodged
Or as usual someone has been trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
I am glad you agree, it was a non story wasn't it as the "deadline" hadn't even passed. We weren't going to be wound up.
I am glad you agree, it was a non story wasn't it as the "deadline" hadn't even passed. We weren't going to be wound up.
The deadline had passed. It was in the contract that it would be sorted within a week. Or are you saying that SP issued the threat for a laugh?
I am talking about this one:
Pressley’s lawyers served the club with a statutory notice on March 10, demanding payment within 21 days.
Did he actually issue a winding up order then?
The point is, it was quite clearly to scare wasn't it?
I think Simon has said before they don't write the headlines (as in Simon when he does an article) so whoever does should stop being a dingbat. Unless they have some random bet going on to get the silliest headline for each article.
"COVENTRY MAN DIAGNOSED WITH DEADLY RARE BRAIN DISEASE"
A man has gone to the doctors with a headache, it could possibly be a deadly rare brain disease but it is actually just a headache. It could have been a brain disease though.
And as you know I was pointing out what was in the contract. They didn't pay up. They sacked him about 2 weeks before he took the legal route. So he then gave them another 3 weeks. And what date was the payment made?
The deadline had passed. It was in the contract that it would be sorted within a week. Or are you saying that SP issued the threat for a laugh?
Perhaps they had paid it into an escrow account, as long as payment goes out of one account, regardless of whether the person owed receives it Nick is happyit has been paid.
Pressley is also obviously happy then if he came to that agreement with them surely?
Where did I say he wasn't?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?