Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Greta Thunberg / Climate Change Summit (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter ccfc92
  • Start date Sep 24, 2019
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Next
First Prev 12 of 13 Next Last
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #386
stupot07 said:
How can you not politicise climate change?

It needs a global response and agreement - that's politics.
It needs policies and legislation to make it happen - that's politics
It needs to win the hearts and minds of people and businesses to buy in to make the changes outlined in those policies with the urgency required - that's politics.

I neither worship nor hate Greta, whatever you think of her, at least shes doing something and is passionate about it. Fair play to her.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Much of this is right. There do need to be political solutions.

However, the issue is increasingly being politicised along left and right lines (but not traditional left/right), that is not healthy and there is so much dishonesty in the debate. Greta and that whole movement, through no fault of her own because I think she is sincere but naive and ill-advised, have set the cause back years. The rhetoric is both divisive and borderline hysterical.

People were coming around. Habits were changing, people were starting to consider electric cars, eating less meat, had woke up to the issue of plastic pollution etc. Now, all they see are people closing roads, digging up lawns, going on marches with questionable political undercurrents and being lectured and hectored almost always by wealthy middle-class elites.

Net zero by 2050. Fine, but let's be honest about what that means. It means higher taxes, higher energy bills, fewer flights and much else. This will impact on the poor far more, in which case let's lay that out and have that discussion honestly. Electric car? Fine if you live in a detached in the suburbs, but what if you live on a row of Victorian terraces, with cars double-parked on both sides and mounting the kerbs. No solution has been put forward that will enable the infrastructure to be put in place to allow for all current car owners to switch over in time. It will be the less well off who make the sacrifice and give up their car, only to be forced onto a rail network where expansion of capacity is always opposed by, you guessed it, the wealthy middle-class nimbys.

Renewable energy - again, only the wealthy can afford it. The FIT scheme was only taken up by those who pay £10,000+ for a system, all to gain access to a subsidy which over time will make them a lot of money. All paid for by a surcharge on bills paid by the rest of us. A few had solar for free, but behind that are people making a lot of money out of it.

I think of pensioners. People who have worked hard all their life. Often people with the smallest carbon footprints - no car, travel by bus, holiday in the UK, wear the sames clothes for years, don't waste food, don't spend their whole day glued to devices - I think of them watching Greta and with her 'how dare you' rants, this around the same time they were being labelled 'gammon' and the likes of Terry Christian were urging them to hurry up and die. Is it any wonder people are kicking back? A lot of this is driven by the liberal left, and they wonder why they don't win elections anymore.

Actually, we probably agree on a lot of what needs to be done. But, while I have nothing against her and accept there are some loonies on the fringes of the climate denial movement who are utterly batshit, she - and the adults who fawn over her - aren't helping. We may have passed the point of no return too - not in terms of the climate, but in terms of ever been able to build a consensus where we're all (aside from a few crazies) on the same page.
 
Reactions: Paxman II, dutchman and Sky_Blue_Dreamer

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #387
theferret said:
Much of this is right. There do need to be political solutions.

However, the issue is increasingly being politicised along left and right lines (but not traditional left/right), that is not healthy and there is so much dishonesty in the debate. Greta and that whole movement, through no fault of her own because I think she is sincere but naive and ill-advised, have set the cause back years. The rhetoric is both divisive and borderline hysterical.

People were coming around. Habits were changing, people were starting to consider electric cars, eating less meat, had woke up to the issue of plastic pollution etc. Now, all they see are people closing roads, digging up lawns, going on marches with questionable political undercurrents and being lectured and hectored almost always by wealthy middle-class elites.

Net zero by 2050. Fine, but let's be honest about what that means. It means higher taxes, higher energy bills, fewer flights and much else. This will impact on the poor far more, in which case let's lay that out and have that discussion honestly. Electric car? Fine if you live in a detached in the suburbs, but what if you live on a row of Victorian terraces, with cars double-parked on both sides and mounting the kerbs. No solution has been put forward that will enable the infrastructure to be put in place to allow for all current car owners to switch over in time. It will be the less well off who make the sacrifice and give up their car, only to be forced onto a rail network where expansion of capacity is always opposed by, you guessed it, the wealthy middle-class nimbys.

Renewable energy - again, only the wealthy can afford it. The FIT scheme was only taken up by those who pay £10,000+ for a system, all to gain access to a subsidy which over time will make them a lot of money. All paid for by a surcharge on bills paid by the rest of us. A few had solar for free, but behind that are people making a lot of money out of it.

I think of pensioners. People who have worked hard all their life. Often people with the smallest carbon footprints - no car, travel by bus, holiday in the UK, wear the sames clothes for years, don't waste food, don't spend their whole day glued to devices - I think of them watching Greta and with her 'how dare you' rants, this around the same time they were being labelled 'gammon' and the likes of Terry Christian were urging them to hurry up and die. Is it any wonder people are kicking back? A lot of this is driven by the liberal left, and they wonder why they don't win elections anymore.

Actually, we probably agree on a lot of what needs to be done. But, while I have nothing against her and accept there are some loonies on the fringes of the climate denial movement who are utterly batshit, she - and the adults who fawn over her - aren't helping. We may have passed the point of no return too - not in terms of the climate, but in terms of ever been able to build a consensus where we're all (aside from a few crazies) on the same page.
Click to expand...

One of those Bashit loonies on the fringe of climate denial is POTUS
 
Reactions: martcov
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #388
theferret said:
Net zero by 2050. Fine, but let's be honest about what that means. It means higher taxes, higher energy bills, fewer flights and much else. This will impact on the poor far more, in which case let's lay that out and have that discussion honestly. Electric car? Fine if you live in a detached in the suburbs, but what if you live on a row of Victorian terraces, with cars double-parked on both sides and mounting the kerbs. No solution has been put forward that will enable the infrastructure to be put in place to allow for all current car owners to switch over in time. It will be the less well off who make the sacrifice and give up their car, only to be forced onto a rail network where expansion of capacity is always opposed
Click to expand...
This I fully agree with. There are many solutions that might work at present levels, too, but won't work if scaled up. We need to ask how that scaling can happen. I'm still not convinced electric is ultimately helpful as a solution, anyway (again, scaling seems... challenging, and do we now need to consider nuclear as 'clean'?!?) so it needs to be discussed.

That being said, I do disagree with you about perceptions and change. It seems the agenda is far more at the forefront at the moment, and that can arguably be because people have brought it there. Leave it to trump, and it wouldn't be.
 
Reactions: wingy and theferret
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #389
Deleted member 5849 said:
This I fully agree with. There are many solutions that might work at present levels, too, but won't work if scaled up. We need to ask how that scaling can happen. I'm still not convinced electric is ultimately helpful as a solution, anyway (again, scaling seems... challenging, and do we now need to consider nuclear as 'clean'?!?) so it needs to be discussed.

That being said, I do disagree with you about perceptions and change. It seems the agenda is far more at the forefront at the moment, and that can arguably be because people have brought it there. Leave it to trump, and it wouldn't be.
Click to expand...
Why does it all revolve around taxes?
Why not allocations/rationing?
Anyone under their limit free to trade with those who wish to exceed their own .
 
Reactions: stupot07

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #390
wingy said:
Why does it all revolve around taxes?
Why not allocations/rationing?
Anyone under their limit free to trade with those who wish to exceed their own .
Click to expand...

And how would you keep track of every single person's CO2 output? Everyone would have to declare every single trip, how they took it, what they ate/drank etc. It'd have to be a police state.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #391
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
And how would you keep track of every single person's CO2 output? Everyone would have to declare every single trip, how they took it, what they ate/drank etc. It'd have to be a police state.
Click to expand...
Algorithms!
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #392
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
And how would you keep track of every single person's CO2 output? Everyone would have to declare every single trip, how they took it, what they ate/drank etc. It'd have to be a police state.
Click to expand...
It's all recorded now, somewhere.
Pull that together?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #393
wingy said:
It's all recorded now, somewhere.
Pull that together?
Click to expand...

My doctor and the hospital can't get the right data on me despite using the same system. We can't get a system that brings together all the different departments for us. We spent billions on a computer system that didn't work. You think we could get a system that sorted out every single aspect of a persons carbon footprint? And even if you did, do you think it's something worth spending billions of pounds on when there a much cheaper alternatives for taxation and/or incentivising?
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #394
I truly believe that we need change, even if you don't believe that climate change is happening, wouldn't you rather live in a place with less pollution. We need to live cleaner lives, even if it's just to save the planets finite resources.
 
Reactions: martcov, SkyBlueDom26, Ian1779 and 2 others

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 29, 2020
  • #395
Marty said:
I truly believe that we need change, even if you don't believe that climate change is happening, wouldn't you rather live in a place with less pollution. We need to live cleaner lives, even if it's just to save the planets finite resources.
Click to expand...
See. You can be sensible
 
Reactions: martcov, Deleted member 5849 and Marty

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #396
this is the sort of shit I'm on about:

Canadian oil company under fire for sexually explicit "Greta" image featuring their logo

she really triggers the gammonati.
 
Reactions: Ian1779
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #397
theferret said:
I think of pensioners. People who have worked hard all their life. Often people with the smallest carbon footprints - no car, travel by bus, holiday in the UK, wear the sames clothes for years, don't waste food, don't spend their whole day glued to devices - I think of them watching Greta and with her 'how dare you' rants, this around the same time they were being labelled 'gammon' and the likes of Terry Christian were urging them to hurry up and die. Is it any wonder people are kicking back? A lot of this is driven by the liberal left, and they wonder why they don't win elections anymore.
.
Click to expand...

Some of this generation have spent years droning on about “millennials” and “snowflakes” and putting every ill of the world on the young so they, and you, have got some cheek to suddenly claim they’re being divisive.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #398
theferret said:
Much of this is right. There do need to be political solutions.

However, the issue is increasingly being politicised along left and right lines (but not traditional left/right), that is not healthy and there is so much dishonesty in the debate. Greta and that whole movement, through no fault of her own because I think she is sincere but naive and ill-advised, have set the cause back years. The rhetoric is both divisive and borderline hysterical.

People were coming around. Habits were changing, people were starting to consider electric cars, eating less meat, had woke up to the issue of plastic pollution etc. Now, all they see are people closing roads, digging up lawns, going on marches with questionable political undercurrents and being lectured and hectored almost always by wealthy middle-class elites.

Net zero by 2050. Fine, but let's be honest about what that means. It means higher taxes, higher energy bills, fewer flights and much else. This will impact on the poor far more, in which case let's lay that out and have that discussion honestly. Electric car? Fine if you live in a detached in the suburbs, but what if you live on a row of Victorian terraces, with cars double-parked on both sides and mounting the kerbs. No solution has been put forward that will enable the infrastructure to be put in place to allow for all current car owners to switch over in time. It will be the less well off who make the sacrifice and give up their car, only to be forced onto a rail network where expansion of capacity is always opposed by, you guessed it, the wealthy middle-class nimbys.

Renewable energy - again, only the wealthy can afford it. The FIT scheme was only taken up by those who pay £10,000+ for a system, all to gain access to a subsidy which over time will make them a lot of money. All paid for by a surcharge on bills paid by the rest of us. A few had solar for free, but behind that are people making a lot of money out of it.

I think of pensioners. People who have worked hard all their life. Often people with the smallest carbon footprints - no car, travel by bus, holiday in the UK, wear the sames clothes for years, don't waste food, don't spend their whole day glued to devices - I think of them watching Greta and with her 'how dare you' rants, this around the same time they were being labelled 'gammon' and the likes of Terry Christian were urging them to hurry up and die. Is it any wonder people are kicking back? A lot of this is driven by the liberal left, and they wonder why they don't win elections anymore.

Actually, we probably agree on a lot of what needs to be done. But, while I have nothing against her and accept there are some loonies on the fringes of the climate denial movement who are utterly batshit, she - and the adults who fawn over her - aren't helping. We may have passed the point of no return too - not in terms of the climate, but in terms of ever been able to build a consensus where we're all (aside from a few crazies) on the same page.
Click to expand...

If the working class stopped voting against their own self interest at each election perhaps some of these practical issues would have been solved.
 
Reactions: Ian1779

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #399
Brighton Sky Blue said:
If the working class stopped voting against their own self interest at each election perhaps some of these practical issues would have been solved.
Click to expand...

Says the privately educated middle class spokesman on behalf of people he thinks can’t speak for themselves
 
Reactions: dutchman
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #400
Grendel said:
Says the privately educated middle class spokesman on behalf of people he thinks can’t speak for themselves
Click to expand...

The Tories have been given a bumper majority thanks to constituencies they have shat on for decades. Truth hurts dude
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #401
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The Tories have been given a bumper majority thanks to constituencies they have shat on for decades. Truth hurts dude
Click to expand...

Oh it really does and those people have seen the light - when will you?
 
Reactions: SkyBlueDom26
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #402
Grendel said:
Oh it really does and those people have seen the light - when will you?
Click to expand...

When I have enough cash to emigrate somewhere better
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • #403
Greta Thunberg spoke about the world being on fire.
From Bristol. While wearing a raincoat, during storm Jorge. :emoji_grin:
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #404
Houchens Head said:
Greta Thunberg spoke about the world being on fire.
From Bristol. While wearing a raincoat, during storm Jorge. :emoji_grin:
Click to expand...

Might be a metaphor.... crazy I know.
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #405
Most of the facts being thrown around by these activist is junk science.
 
Reactions: Houchens Head
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #406
Paxman II said:
Most of the facts being thrown around by these activist is junk science.
Click to expand...

You get the general idea though

Man burns fossil fuels

CO2 released

CO2 absorbs heat

Temperature rises
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #407
bsb I'm mnot going to get into this whole debate as its just too time consuming for me but yes co2 absorbs heat but the earth is lacking in co2.
We all have opinions and there are scare tactics and you could say follow the money.
But if you have 15 minutes check out this video, it certainly questions the crazy agenda of Greta and her supporters with some actual factual science.
 
Reactions: Houchens Head and fellatio_Martinez
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #408
Fair play for Greta/ER to have focussed people’s minds more (although I do think a lot of people and even the government were already taking certain steps), however, I’m not quite sure what their aims are from future protests ? Surely they could/should try to focus on a clear message(s) for each march/protest to try to get the public to change their habits ie stop buying bottled water (use reuseable water bottles) and other single use plastic packaging, reducing car use and walk shorter journeys, encourage using energy suppliers renewable energy tariffs (if possible/affordable), only boiling kettle with water needed, having a couple of family meat free days etc etc. All simple and relatively easy things that everyone could be doing (at least more of) but many may not even consider some of them.

As has been said earlier in the thread governments have a role to play but most steps they take will lead to higher taxes or increased prices of certain goods, so I can’t see ours doing more than has already been promised because of more protests. Therefore surely to maximise future marches/protest effectiveness they need to try to change the public’s habits with clear messages and provide details of the positive impact that each of these steps could have.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #409
CCFCSteve said:
Fair play for Greta/ER to have focussed people’s minds more (although I do think a lot of people and even the government were already taking certain steps), however, I’m not quite sure what their aims are from future protests ? Surely they could/should try to focus on a clear message(s) for each march/protest to try to get the public to change their habits ie stop buying bottled water (use reuseable water bottles) and other single use plastic packaging, reducing car use and walk shorter journeys, encourage using energy suppliers renewable energy tariffs (if possible/affordable), only boiling kettle with water needed, having a couple of family meat free days etc etc. All simple and relatively easy things that everyone could be doing (at least more of) but many may not even consider some of them.

As has been said earlier in the thread governments have a role to play but most steps they take will lead to higher taxes or increased prices of certain goods, so I can’t see ours doing more than has already been promised because of more protests. Therefore surely to maximise future marches/protest effectiveness they need to try to change the public’s habits with clear messages and provide details of the positive impact that each of these steps could have.
Click to expand...

I agree that they need to spend more time focusing on solutions that just protests.

Of course when you start telling people what to do they don't tend to like it. It's not like we've not heard these things from others before (inc. the governments they criticise so much). Whether they'd have enough goodwill to do it more effectively I don't know but I expect not - a lot of it just seems to " get angry" and just be a pain in the arse - some of the stuff they've done hasn't had any coherent environmental thinking behind it.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #410
Paxman II said:
bsb I'm mnot going to get into this whole debate as its just too time consuming for me but yes co2 absorbs heat but the earth is lacking in co2.
We all have opinions and there are scare tactics and you could say follow the money.
But if you have 15 minutes check out this video, it certainly questions the crazy agenda of Greta and her supporters with some actual factual science.
Click to expand...

I have a Masters in factual science to be fair
 

Houchens Head

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Mar 2, 2020
  • #411
Paxman II said:
bsb I'm mnot going to get into this whole debate as its just too time consuming for me but yes co2 absorbs heat but the earth is lacking in co2.
We all have opinions and there are scare tactics and you could say follow the money.
But if you have 15 minutes check out this video, it certainly questions the crazy agenda of Greta and her supporters with some actual factual science.
Click to expand...
Brilliant! Seriously thinking about getting his book!
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #412
Paxman II said:
bsb I'm mnot going to get into this whole debate as its just too time consuming for me but yes co2 absorbs heat but the earth is lacking in co2.
We all have opinions and there are scare tactics and you could say follow the money.
But if you have 15 minutes check out this video, it certainly questions the crazy agenda of Greta and her supporters with some actual factual science.
Click to expand...

This guy has been outed as a paid propagandist loads of times. I would look at some of the actual science. I skimmed through the video anyway but didn’t hear anything of merit. Was there actually anything in it to back up your claim that “the earth is lacking CO2”?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #413
djr8369 said:
This guy has been outed as a paid propagandist loads of times. I would look at some of the actual science. I skimmed through the video anyway but didn’t hear anything of merit. Was there actually anything in it to back up your claim that “the earth is lacking CO2”?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Thats just an overview. He has many videos if you care to find out where he demonstrates the factual science which has never been disputed. He has not been outed and is not a paid propagandist as you claim.
 

1nilandwe...

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #414
I've seen the Venn diagram of 'Scientists' and 'People who use the phrase "Factual Science"' and I can report that the circles do not overlap.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #415
Paxman II said:
Thats just an overview. He has many videos if you care to find out where he demonstrates the factual science which has never been disputed. He has not been outed and is not a paid propagandist as you claim.
Click to expand...

According to Greenpeace, he has massively exploited his early involvement with them to now become a mouthpiece for many polluting industries & a key lobbyist for climate change denial.

According to DeSmog the bloke has even lied about his qualifications.

...Just cos he calls himself doctor & wears tie on youtube, don't mean its true dude...
 
Reactions: clint van damme
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #416
Paxman II said:
Thats just an overview. He has many videos if you care to find out where he demonstrates the factual science which has never been disputed. He has not been outed and is not a paid propagandist as you claim.
Click to expand...

Do direct me to the videos and papers he’s authored on the subject. Frankly at this stage in the game for this to be even debatable is a joke
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #417
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Do direct me to the videos and papers he’s authored on the subject. Frankly at this stage in the game for this to be even debatable is a joke
Click to expand...
Oh boy there are many you can find easily. I'm not hear to debate it with anyone, only to say where I stand.
But here's one such video to get you started.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #418
Paxman II said:
Oh boy there are many you can find easily. I'm not hear to debate it with anyone, only to say where I stand.
But here's one such video to get you started.
Click to expand...

Very good will compare it with several years of degree study at my end
 

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #419
A video isn't a credible source. A peer reviewed journal is.
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849

fellatio_Martinez

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2020
  • #420
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Very good will compare it with several years of degree study at my end
Click to expand...

Yeah, we get it mate. You have a degree.
 
Reactions: Marty, SkyBlueDom26 and Houchens Head
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Next
First Prev 12 of 13 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?