Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Frank (15 Viewers)

  • Thread starter edgy
  • Start date Yesterday at 10:08 PM
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
S

Skyblueabo1111

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:43 PM
  • #71
skybluecam said:
Statistically we’ve created more chances than the oppo in all 3 matches.
Click to expand...
Stats mean nothing, all about chances. Both were dominant first half. We got lucky, same as first half today. We are getting completely overrun. Amazed people can't see it.
 
I

Ibby

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:44 PM
  • #72
Two spots open.
 

hinckley cov

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:45 PM
  • #73
2024/25 League 1 Champs? said:
Torp is more of an option at 10 in this system, in my opinion, and not a player to play alongside Grimes in games you’re going to get overrun or countered…

Hamer can do the job there, with a bit more creativity than Grimes, Sheaf would’ve been ideal, and yeah Onyeka sounds like a solution.

The only issue I have is Grimes severely lacks pace, and we could do with a player there with stamina and pace to cover as they will get through a hell of a lot of work between now and the end of the season
Click to expand...
Torp was awful tonight him and Grimes are so slow infact we have no pace in there at all .
 
Reactions: RegiswasGod

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:46 PM
  • #74
Shannerz said:
As he should be, but you can see why a system that exposes him is going to affect his game.
Click to expand...
Not in that context. If we get caught on the break and he gets done for pace, or makes a mistake under pressure, or even a progressive pass that goes astray, that’s fair enough and those errors happen.

He’s just miscontrolled the ball under no pressure and Norwich react quickly, it’s unforgivable.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:49 PM
  • #75
Skyblueabo1111 said:
Norwich could have been 3 up, at half time. Same as Leicester and Millwall.
Click to expand...
We had a higher xG in both halves so whatever chances you think they should’ve scored, we literally had better chances.

That’s not even including EMC missing from a yard out and Haji having one cleared off the line.
 

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:51 PM
  • #76
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Not in that context. If we get caught on the break and he gets done for pace, or makes a mistake under pressure, or even a progressive pass that goes astray, that’s fair enough and those errors happen.

He’s just miscontrolled the ball under no pressure and Norwich react quickly, it’s unforgivable.
Click to expand...
Ok, I'm not saying the system directly resulted directly in an unforced error, in the sense that it put him in that position. It didn't.

What I'm saying is that if a system that leaves a player exposed is going to affect their confidence, put them on edge, and so make them more susceptible to making unforced errors. It's making our defenders nervous.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:51 PM
  • #77
Skyblueabo1111 said:
Stats mean nothing, all about chances. Both were dominant first half. We got lucky, same as first half today. We are getting completely overrun. Amazed people can't see it.
Click to expand...
Your back 3 idea seems to not take into any account our current in possession shape has a back 3, the issue is the cover and space left in front of them.

We can play 4 CBs and they still struggle if we keep giving away so much space in the midfield.
 
S

Skyblueabo1111

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:53 PM
  • #78
David O'Day said:
Your back 3 idea seems to not take into any account our current in possession shape has a back 3, the issue is the cover and space left in front of them.

We can play 4 CBs and they still struggle if we keep giving away so much space in the midfield.
Click to expand...
No idea what you posted. We did it at Portsmouth and won 3.1.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:55 PM
  • #79
Skyblueabo1111 said:
No idea what you posted. We did it at Portsmouth and won 3.1.
Click to expand...
Yes because the midfield was deeper and left no space for the opposition to flood through.

If you have no idea what I posted then you really shouldn't be discussing football tactics.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 11:58 PM
  • #80
Skyblueabo1111 said:
No idea what you posted. We did it at Portsmouth and won 3.1.
Click to expand...
Oh and we also played a back 3 against Charlton and were not great.

Apart from you still not solving the space in the midfield issue you also haven't taken into account the issue that good teams will push their full backs ultra high creating overloads on each flank as their isn't a natural wide attacker to track back. This then means central players get pulled out wide to help leaving gaps that can be exploited.

An example of this is home against Leeds last year.
 
E

Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:05 AM
  • #81
Winny the Bish said:
It would only take two changes to make us look stronger:

1. Tell Dasilva to stay back at all times
2. Change the midfield to a proper double pivot, instead of the 8 being closer to the CF than Grimes

It's been MONTHS of us getting ripped apart on the counter and Lampard has done fuck all about it.
Click to expand...

I do think in Da Silva’s defence that he’s been left badly exposed to multiple 1 v 1s by EMC/Wright or whoever has played on the left wing. This has been compounded by a lack of pace/legs in centre midfield to get over and help out….coupled with two centre halves who are slow to read the game and lack the pace to make recovery/covering runs to help.

If we had more pace/better reading of the game in centre mid and centre back, maybe we could get away with it but JDS looks frequently exposed.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:06 AM
  • #82
Skyblueabo1111 said:
No idea what you posted. We did it at Portsmouth and won 3.1.
Click to expand...
Also the pedant in me has to say it was 2-1
 
S

Skyblueabo1111

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:17 AM
  • #83
Mucca Mad Boys said:
We had a higher xG in both halves so whatever chances you think they should’ve scored, we literally had better chances.

That’s not even including EMC missing from a yard out and Haji having one cleared off the line.
Click to expand...
Xg means nothing. They should have been 3 up at half time. Again.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 12:31 AM
  • #84
Skyblueabo1111 said:
Xg means nothing. They should have been 3 up at half time. Again.
Click to expand...
What chances then? Both of their best chances were their second half goals…
 

SeaSeeEffCee

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 1:13 AM
  • #85
We’ve been dreadful since Ipswich and he’s not done much to change it. Definitely his worst month in charge.
 
S

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 2:42 AM
  • #86
SeaSeeEffCee said:
We’ve been dreadful since Ipswich and he’s not done much to change it. Definitely his worst month in charge.
Click to expand...
I mentioned a few weeks ago that when he's been in charge at other clubs once they have gone on a poor run it's usually been unable to turn it around. Hope I'm wrong ,but we've not been much good for about 2 months. Rushworths either sav d us and we've relied on home form . Charlton , Watford , WBA, Millwall sliced through our midfield and defence but luckily missed their chances
 

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 3:11 AM
  • #87
I am not crowing for his head btw, far from it

But tonight is the first time this season I have felt genuinely let down/concerned by Lampard - the set up was completely baffling tonight
 
Reactions: Skyblue Bangkok
S

Skyblue Bangkok

Well-Known Member
  • 38 minutes ago
  • #88
alexccfc99 said:
I am not crowing for his head btw, far from it

But tonight is the first time this season I have felt genuinely let down/concerned by Lampard - the set up was completely baffling tonight
Click to expand...
The decision not to sign Bamford has come back to haunt us.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Paxman II2 minutes ago
  • Lee775 minutes ago
  • Gleneagles656 minutes ago
  • SD738 minutes ago
  • harriman8112 minutes ago
  • ... and 1 more.
  • Total: 14 (members: 6, guests: 8)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?