Their owners are far better for football than that tosser at Forest.
They're far better people than the tosser at Forest, but I'm not sure their input into the game is good for football. It's good for Wrexham Football Club, but that is not necessarily the same thing.
They've taken a club and completely inflated it with income; financial doping, really. That causes an imbalance with the clubs they are competing with, who just cannot match that income; you may disagree, but I don't consider that a fair advantage. They also massively inflate the market value of players, because they can afford to throw money about without consequence, and so overpay. That has a knock-on effect and again has a negative impact on their direct rivals.
This has all been done before, of course; Bournemouth 10 or 15 years ago, and much more egregiously by the likes of Chelsea and Manchester City.
I'll admit to being personally a bit annoyed by them because of the nauseating coverage they get, but even looking at it objectively, I don't think what they are doing is good for football as a whole.