Yup. VAR has ruined the sport at the 'top' levels.Just endless, endless, endless moaning about referees and VAR and referees and VAR. Do people even talk about football anymore?
No it hasn't, the use of VAR and incorrect decisions by VAR officials hasYup. VAR has ruined the sport at the 'top' levels.
Was the Dasilva one more obvious than that one?The "Denying an Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity" (DOGSO) law in football, also known as the Professional Foul Law, was introduced in 1990...
For Lineker to say he had never heard the "Obvious" part before is embarrassing frankly.
If they'd stick to just correcting clear and obvious mistakes (like the offside and, I'd argue, the handball) VAR would be fine. Should just need a quick glance.No it hasn't, the use of VAR and incorrect decisions by VAR officials has
Listening to the wrong side mate!It comes to something when a pair of buffoons like Rooney and Richards are the voice of reason
Too interested in making controversial political comments.It was a possible goalscoring opportunity but not necessarily an OBVIOUS goalscoring opportunity or an obvious error due to the direction of play & the presence of a defender etc.
It probably should have been a red card but once it's not given on field it won't get overturned.
Baffling that Lineker doesn't know the laws of the game given how long he's been involved.
It’s just reduced the game to a series of micro-controversies that you can watch in super slo-mo for 15 minutes at half time in lieu of any actual analysis of the game itself. And people love it too, most posts on here during ‘big’ games are just endless re-litigating of marginal offsides etcYup. VAR has ruined the sport at the 'top' levels.
Yes, when that is the case. So not this time, based on footage I have seen.Looking at that Bernardo foul, I think I preferred it when ‘winning the ball first’ was enough for it not to be a foul.
You're advocating complete automation then ,in reality?No it hasn't, the use of VAR and incorrect decisions by VAR officials has
But it's impossible. You're just adding another layer of subjectivity on another.No it hasn't, the use of VAR and incorrect decisions by VAR officials has
No, I'm advocating only using it for what it was intended, ie clear and obvious errors, and the VAR officials coming to the correct decision using the evidence in front of themYou're advocating complete automation then ,in reality?
Yeah maybe. Wrapped his foot around. Not a big one, just got me thinking.Yes, when that is the case. So not this time, based on footage I have seen.
Straight at himAnother good save
That definitely should be!That should be KDB off!
Of course. He's clean through, straight at goal with no defenders. If he wasn't clipped he would 100% get an unchallenged shot at goal so, unfortunate as it was for the accidental clip, it has to be DOGSO.Was the Dasilva one more obvious than that one?
Didn’t ‘intent’ used to be a thing for such fouls?Of course. He's clean through, straight at goal with no defenders. If he wasn't clipped he would 100% get an unchallenged shot at goal so, unfortunate as it was for the accidental clip, it has to be DOGSO.
No.Didn’t ‘intent’ used to be a thing for such fouls?
They really are.Palace fans are great.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?