Frostie

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
9,781
13,413
313
Just endless, endless, endless moaning about referees and VAR and referees and VAR. Do people even talk about football anymore?
Yup. VAR has ruined the sport at the 'top' levels.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
Jul 15, 2010
20,997
12,198
413
South Yorkshire
The "Denying an Obvious Goal-Scoring Opportunity" (DOGSO) law in football, also known as the Professional Foul Law, was introduced in 1990...

For Lineker to say he had never heard the "Obvious" part before is embarrassing frankly.
Was the Dasilva one more obvious than that one?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2012
8,664
5,285
313
It was a possible goalscoring opportunity but not necessarily an OBVIOUS goalscoring opportunity or an obvious error due to the direction of play & the presence of a defender etc.

It probably should have been a red card but once it's not given on field it won't get overturned.

Baffling that Lineker doesn't know the laws of the game given how long he's been involved.
Too interested in making controversial political comments.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Sep 14, 2012
11,450
14,996
263
Yup. VAR has ruined the sport at the 'top' levels.
It’s just reduced the game to a series of micro-controversies that you can watch in super slo-mo for 15 minutes at half time in lieu of any actual analysis of the game itself. And people love it too, most posts on here during ‘big’ games are just endless re-litigating of marginal offsides etc
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2011
40,436
11,364
263
Clearly it's a malfunction of the system, emotional or decision based on Save the spectacle so commercial,it stinks it really does, but hey the kid's love it!
 

Paul Anthony

Well-Known Member
Sep 9, 2016
5,163
3,047
213
What was O'Riley trying to do? Surely you just have the shot there?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frostie

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2017
6,736
7,401
313
Looking at that Bernardo foul, I think I preferred it when ‘winning the ball first’ was enough for it not to be a foul.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2012
8,664
5,285
313
Looking at that Bernardo foul, I think I preferred it when ‘winning the ball first’ was enough for it not to be a foul.
Yes, when that is the case. So not this time, based on footage I have seen.

Will be interesting to see if we ever get to see the VAR footage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terry_dactyl

ovduk78

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2011
2,466
2,376
213
Callander
You're advocating complete automation then ,in reality?
No, I'm advocating only using it for what it was intended, ie clear and obvious errors, and the VAR officials coming to the correct decision using the evidence in front of them
 
  • Like
Reactions: MalcSB

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2017
6,736
7,401
313
Yes, when that is the case. So not this time, based on footage I have seen.
Yeah maybe. Wrapped his foot around. Not a big one, just got me thinking.
It’d be great watching players smash others but getting the ball first…I didn’t mind doing it myself back in the day.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
9,781
13,413
313
Was the Dasilva one more obvious than that one?
Of course. He's clean through, straight at goal with no defenders. If he wasn't clipped he would 100% get an unchallenged shot at goal so, unfortunate as it was for the accidental clip, it has to be DOGSO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stupot07

Terry_dactyl

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2017
6,736
7,401
313
Of course. He's clean through, straight at goal with no defenders. If he wasn't clipped he would 100% get an unchallenged shot at goal so, unfortunate as it was for the accidental clip, it has to be DOGSO.
Didn’t ‘intent’ used to be a thing for such fouls?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2013
41,061
49,525
313
Coventry
I really really really want palace to hold on here
 
  • Like
Reactions: AOM

Users who are viewing this thread