Nick
Administrator
Yes, it is saying "Did the council have talks" which includes all of the councillors and mayor rather than listing individuals.
They can enter the debate and say "we confirm again that nobody at all had any talks with anybody"
The Council refers to the however many councillors there are in the room. We had this discussion before and I know you think it’s pedantic (and it is) but it implies that the councillors have admitted talks with Wasps which several have been explicit in denying. Ridley knows this and was hoping for the reaction he got. Labour were stupid to give him that reaction no doubt and should have just let the debate happen but seem to be worried about it being reported as “councillors admit they had talks because they accepted the debate”. As I say the whole thing is fucked and neither side is playing with a straight bat here.
Yes, it is saying "Did the council have talks" which includes all of the councillors and mayor rather than listing individuals.
They can enter the debate and say "we confirm again that nobody at all had any talks with anybody"
Can someone reword “why are you acting such a nob?” In a format appropriate for prime time BBC radio? Cheers.
"We will provide a written response internally soon"Can someone reword “why are you acting such a nob?” In a format appropriate for prime time BBC radio? Cheers.
Can someone reword “why are you acting such a nob?” In a format appropriate for prime time BBC radio? Cheers.
You're being a bit of a dick aren't you.
Missed a load of this . Who's said what and what changed?
Have we signed this mini deal as I read through we're alright now to May?Nothing really. Ridley wanted a debate about the Wasps bailout that didn’t happen and implied “the council” had admitted involvement. Labour and Lord Mayor said they wanted the wording changed. Tories walked out of council chamber.
Meanwhile everyone says don’t worry about being evicted. And King EFL approval likely in the next week.
(not sure what you missed)
Have we signed this mini deal as I read through we're alright now to May?
Or is it something else like soothing word's spoken?
Massively undersold it. Look what Chelsea got and they don't even own the pitch the fans do.No he put up with that for years. He left when he got the price he wanted.
Chelsea owners overpaid but income disparity & asset value between Chelsea & Newcastle meant Ashley got a fair price for Newcastle.Massively undersold it. Look what Chelsea got and they don't even own the pitch the fans do.
Maton saying the council had no influence and is the same as a city fan.
Strange, would the council not have to be involved to transfer the lease?
Chelsea owners overpaid but income disparity & asset value between Chelsea & Newcastle meant Ashley got a fair price for Newcastle.
Let alone the address differential.Chelsea are a much much bigger brand than Newcastle TBF
No the sale to Ashley.Influence in what? The eviction?
I’ve said before I’m not sure what any clause would actually look like.
There was a petition but duggins closed it down.Swain mentioned a full inquiry into the stadium sales and Maton wanted absolutely nothing to do with it. Started rambling on about everything and anything else. Is there a petition thing that when it gets to a certain number has to be debated with the council? I think every fan pretty much would welcome a proper inquiry into the councils behaviour.
"We will only consider e-petitions that are hosted on its website. "Stand outside the CBS a couple of games and you’d approach that?
How do you prove the signatures are from Coventry residents?
15000 signatures just for Maton to refuse it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?