Not sure he’ll take that much convincing! Think Dom Hyam must have been on the single malt that day.
The replies there are gold-
"ya daft scarecrow"
"Pipe down you big goth"
"You pissed again"
"If you’d fuck off we might actually be able to build here"
Not sure it means anything either way him being there or not. The optics may say its bad but we are not going to get the truth on it anyway.
Any announcement will come out the blue like everything else connected to the club.
Any announcement will come out the blue like everything else connected to the club.
I think O'Hare was as good as gone in January. Has this new injury has scuppered our financial plans?
We may have been able to keep Gyok as long as his release fee wasnt triggered?
But January is the time to tweek your squad, not rebuild.
We may have been able to keep Gyok as long as his release fee wasnt triggered?
But January is the time to tweek your squad, not rebuild.
Last edited:
Here is a clue for you "I think". I'm not dressing it up as my source or I have heard like so many posters.
I heard the same
Very big offer from Burnley
Terrible for everyone concerned but especially for COH
Football can be cruel
Last edited:
Shame for the lad. As much as I don't want to see him go he deserves a big earner and that's twice he's had it pulled from under him.
but, i thought King said "NOBODY WILL BE SOLD IN JANUARY"...........
To be fair that relies on King actually being in charge
Robins said he'd already told O'Hare (and Vik) they won't be leaving in January, prior to Callum's injury on boxing day.
Let's be honest with our self's now , this take over isn't going to happen !
It's gone on to long with the one question the EFL are asking that Doug can't answer, "where will Coventry city be playing next season " and because he can't answer that question he will be rejected by the EFL .
Only one person can answer that and he will become the next owner , like it or not.
Imo the sooner the better.
It's gone on to long with the one question the EFL are asking that Doug can't answer, "where will Coventry city be playing next season " and because he can't answer that question he will be rejected by the EFL .
Only one person can answer that and he will become the next owner , like it or not.
Imo the sooner the better.
D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
Worked with McCallum though. He played just as well on loan.
How can King answer that question? The current contract is only until the end of the season. Until he is approved as the owner he cant take any part in the club s affairs and not in a position to negotiate a new one.
Well he can’t but perhaps he’s been asked to sort that security before a takeover and frankly I’d support that all the way
The current owners are in no better position than King to answer that question in reality.
That's very true but the EFL cannot really do anything about the current owners, what they will do is make sure any future owner has the ground situation sorted. Fraser group own the stadium and either they buy the club or the owners of the club enter into a long term contract to rent the stadium. Until either of these options happen there is zero chance of EFL approval in my opinion, but who knows.
But don't lots of clubs rent stadiums? And are at various stages of those leases. The EFL cannot expect certainty any more than anyone can.
well it does as part of ownership is a knowledge of where we play and if it’s affordable
Haven't got time to look it up at the moment but pretty sure there's a regulation that requires a minimum of a 10 year lease in place.
Of course the downside of that means Frasers have the club over a barrel when it's time to negotiate, if they say they want £5m a year or some other ridiculous sum what can we do? Not like the new stadium is ever likely to happen
Not sure that’s how it works in business especially when it’s a mutually desirable solutionHaven't got time to look it up at the moment but pretty sure there's a regulation that requires a minimum of a 10 year lease in place.
Of course the downside of that means Frasers have the club over a barrel when it's time to negotiate, if they say they want £5m a year or some other ridiculous sum what can we do? Not like the new stadium is ever likely to happen
Last edited:
Haven't got time to look it up at the moment but pretty sure there's a regulation that requires a minimum of a 10 year lease in place.
Of course the downside of that means Frasers have the club over a barrel when it's time to negotiate, if they say they want £5m a year or some other ridiculous sum what can we do? Not like the new stadium is ever likely to happen
If that is the case, why would the club be expecting clearance from the EFL?
I mean, why even pretend, knowing it will be exposed?