Well oddly I am looking at the media headlines and I don't see it - is this an SBT exclusive which you are waiting to deliver to the world across numerous media outlets and publications?
Imagine if Sultana, Polanski, Starmer or any of the preferred figures of fun was rattling off videos as a side hustle and gave a shout out to a child rapist. Internet would melt.
Do you want to discuss boring politics?
Nice climb down by x and musk on grok making images of childrenwww.skybluestalk.co.uk
The videos on that postOh so it literally is an SBT exclusive then
The videos on that post
Which seems not to have attracted a lot of media interest does it?
Nigel Farage ‘tricked into paying tribute to Ian Watkins’
It cost £98 for The Reform UK leader to film the clip on his Cameo accountmetro.co.uk
It’s on the previous page of this thread, you replied to a post that referred directly to it. Have you just woken up?Well oddly I am looking at the media headlines and I don't see it - is this an SBT exclusive which you are waiting to deliver to the world across numerous media outlets and publications?
Sorry haven't seen that. Just showing you where its been reported in the media.But its claimed on here this should be across every main media outlet and is THE biggest story regarding Farage?
Can anyone translate thisI genuinely needed even know the Dailly Star existed anymore. Election over - Farage is finished - it woz the start that did it
Can anyone translate this
I genuinely needed even know (sic) the Star had covered it today tbh - it isn’t usually in my morning readingI think its easy start is Star Mr Bernstein - I am genuinely interested why you believe journalists should consider this bigger news that - oops - Jenrick and why they all (other than the Star) got it so wrong. Is this your article in the Start (oops sorry - Star?)
I think its easy start is Star Mr Bernstein - I am genuinely interested why you believe journalists should consider this bigger news that - oops - Jenrick and why they all (other than the Star) got it so wrong. Is this your article in the Start (oops sorry - Star?)
Which seems not to have attracted a lot of media interest does it?
Well yeah exactly, that's the point being made.
Its still pretty distasteful on his part isn't it?Which may mean its considered a non story rather than a right and left wing media conspiracy to protect him from scandal?
I genuinely needed even know (sic) the Star had covered it today tbh - it isn’t usually in my morning reading
I feel like it shows pretty awful judgment from Farage - don’t you agree?
It was his grift video that was posted on here the other day about Ian Watkins.Well I don’t.
You're right, its nowhere near as big a deal as being photographed eating a sandwichHe's made to look a bit silly, and I would have expected him to know who Ian Watkins was, but he's the victim of the prank at the end of the day. Not sure it is really a massive deal that some want it to be.
It was his grift video that was posted on here the other day about Ian Watkins.
You don't think the potential PM would/should know about one of the most high profile sex offenders in recent history?
Even ignoring this particular story or whether he was tricked, it's pretty awful optics that he's doing these shitty little videos anyway for 50 quid here and there.
You’re both making a mountain out of a molehill. Serious journalists and news outlets haven’t bothered with the story for a reason.I'm not sure if I'm surprised that you're defending him on this but it's honestly hilarious that you've tried
But its still in bad taste isn't it.You’re both making a mountain out of a molehill. Serious journalists and news outlets haven’t bothered with the story for a reason.
Wasn’t Starmer head of the CPS when it chose not to charge Jimmy Saville?
"Sing up the 'RA!"If Nige can’t be arsed to do even the slightest bit of due diligence into these Cameo requests what makes you think he’d approach governing differently?
Edit: and given he’s been burnt before by a similar request you’d think he’d have even more reason to scrutinise?
If Nige can’t be arsed to do even the slightest bit of due diligence into these Cameo requests what makes you think he’d approach governing differently?
Edit: and given he’s been burnt before by a similar request you’d think he’d have even more reason to scrutinise?
And if he'll do something like that for £50, what will he do for £10k or £100k?
"Sing up the 'RA!"
I’ve not said I think it’s another Pentagon Papers or something, and plenty of serious outlets have indeed covered the story. The question is one of judgment and the calibre of the people around him and it seems like Farage’s have been found lacking. Surprised it didn’t generate more conversation on here at first tbh.You’re both making a mountain out of a molehill. Serious journalists and news outlets haven’t bothered with the story for a reason.
Wasn’t Starmer head of the CPS when it chose not to charge Jimmy Saville?
Same guy who did it.
What are you suggesting? There is a media cover up?
His £98 is still £98, that is literally all that matters.Genuinely makes it worse.
I happen to agree with on the Starmer/Saville stuff. The point is more about ‘judgement’ or the people in Starmer’s government who have represented terrorists, like Lord Hermer. That’s also questionable judgement and these people are running the government.I’ve not said I think it’s another Pentagon Papers or something, and plenty of serious outlets have indeed covered the story. The question is one of judgment and the calibre of the people around him and it seems like Farage’s have been found lacking. Surprised it didn’t generate more conversation on here at first tbh.
The Starmer/Saville stuff was worn out during the Sunak premiership!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?