Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Do you want to discuss boring politics? (26 Viewers)

  • Thread starter mrtrench
  • Start date Jun 14, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1586
  • 1587
  • 1588
  • 1589
  • 1590
  • 1591
  • 1592
Next
First Prev 1588 of 1592 Next Last

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:36 PM
  • #55,546
David O'Day said:
I know, person acts with good intentions but makes a mistake, mistake is found out and person fixies mistake but resigns job anyway
Click to expand...
Hardly good intentions is it, she got found out. Hilarious how people can defend it yet if it was someone else you’d all be saying the opposite
 
Reactions: eastwoodsdustman and fatso
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:38 PM
  • #55,547
This all very dull. Far more interesting when some filthy scandal. Fair play she did the right thing in the end, I mean the Tory fella drive 250 miles for an opticians appointment in lockdown so they are all as bad as each other. I don't care for the left or right to be honest so no agenda
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:42 PM
  • #55,548
PVA said:
OK then tell me the difference between what Rayner has done and what Farage has done.
Click to expand...
The true scandal might not even be the stamp duty btw. There's something potentially v dodgy going on with her house as the £650k valuation that was used to sell her share is close to double similar properties in their area.

The fundamental difference is that in opposition, Labour made a play of how they were bringing back 'integrity' to politics. Starmer himself backed himself in a corner by saying he'd sack people on the spot for misbehaving. Rayner herself called for many, many Tory ministers to resign and constantly sung the 'one rule for them, one rule for us'... Well, time to practice what you preach.

Rayner was up to something, didn't seek proper tax advice and got caught out. That fact is somehow worse - it's incompetent.

The electorate can see Labour is looking to increase taxes so when a senior government figure plays fast and loose with the laws, people aren't looking at that too kindly.

In my view, this government will start to splinter because losing Rayner is actually huge loss for Starmer.
 
Reactions: DT-R, rob9872, StrettoBoy and 2 others
O

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:42 PM
  • #55,549
Macca said:
This all very dull. Far more interesting when some filthy scandal. Fair play she did the right thing in the end, I mean the Tory fella drive 250 miles for an opticians appointment in lockdown so they are all as bad as each other. I don't care for the left or right to be honest so no agenda
Click to expand...
You think this is dull? Just wait until you hear of her expense claim for whitewashing the graffiti from her wall.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:43 PM
  • #55,550
eastwoodsdustman said:
She hung on for the week in the hope that it would die down.
Its Not exactly been honourable behaviour throughout the whole saga has it.
Click to expand...
More so than many
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Yesterday at 1:44 PM
  • #55,551
She's a much better politician than the likes of Streeting and Reeves.
 

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:45 PM
  • #55,552
Wonder who Starmer will appoint for DPM to take PMQs when he’s putting the rest of the world to rights.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:45 PM
  • #55,553
oscillatewildly said:
You think this is dull? Just wait until you hear of her expense claim for whitewashing the graffiti from her wall.
Click to expand...
Gonna cost you guv/luv
 
O

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:46 PM
  • #55,554
Sick Boy said:
She's a much better politician than the likes of Streeting and Reeves.
Click to expand...
That's a very low bar you've set there.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:47 PM
  • #55,555
Sbarcher said:
Wonder who Starmer will appoint for DPM to take PMQs when he’s putting the rest of the world to rights.
Click to expand...
Labour members will elect a deputy leader so this is where things may get tasty. If they elect someone who is at odds with Starmer's government record so far, it will be a source of friction/rebellion.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:48 PM
  • #55,556
Sick Boy said:
She's a much better politician than the likes of Streeting and Reeves.
Click to expand...
Yeah but now she's out and they're poised, can't see Rachel in there.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:50 PM
  • #55,557
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Hardly good intentions is it, she got found out. Hilarious how people can defend it yet if it was someone else you’d all be saying the opposite
Click to expand...
Just a slight whiff of irony when your profile pic is of someone infinitely more corrupt than anyone in UK politics
 
O

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:51 PM
  • #55,558
wingy said:
Yeah but now she's out and they're poised, can't see Rachel in there.
Click to expand...
I think she'd jump at the chance - And leave the shit storm of the autumn budget to somebody else.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:51 PM
  • #55,559
Can't believe she didn't get advised by a colleague.must be some cold shoulder going on in cabinet!
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:52 PM
  • #55,560
shmmeee said:
They don’t care about the principle. They spent 14 years voting for the biggest tax dodgers around. They just hate seeing a working class woman do well. Private school boys only pls.
Click to expand...
The funny thing is, if it were a tory getting caught for tax dodging, you'd be the one screaming blue murder from the roof tops,

You cant have it both ways, you get caught your gone simple as that. Doesn't matter a fuck what your background is. You cant have a 2 tier system. (Ironic as that's what Labour are constantly accused of)

And let's not forget, not only did she seek to fiddle her tax, she then deliberately lied when she said her legal advisors had told her what she should pay. Then the legal firm come out and say they did no such thing. So basically saying she's bullshitting to the public.

Her actions are completely indefensible, you can only question the motives of anyone seeking to defend her.

And pointing the fingers at the tories is just pathetic when you remember that the country lost all faith in them and overturned an 80+ seat majority due to their incompetence, so why wouldn't the same accountability be applied to the deputy prime minister?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:53 PM
  • #55,561

Angela Rayner resignation letter and Sir Keir Starmer reply in full

Rayner says she "deeply regrets" her conduct over Hove property, while PM says he's "very sad".
www.bbc.co.uk

Self referred - imagine Johnson Hancock or Farage tice and Lowe doing such a thing no nor me
 
Reactions: Seamus1 and oscillatewildly

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:54 PM
  • #55,562
wingy said:
Yeah but now she's out and they're poised, can't see Rachel in there.
Click to expand...
Rachel Reeves will be very lucky to hang on to her job after the next budget.
Im fully braced for the shit to hit the fan, and for Starmer to throw her under the bus to save his own neck.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:59 PM
  • #55,563
Mucca Mad Boys said:
The true scandal might not even be the stamp duty btw. There's something potentially v dodgy going on with her house as the £650k valuation that was used to sell her share is close to double similar properties in their area.
Click to expand...
Maybe she used the same people that Wasps used to value the stadium
 
Reactions: Moff, oscillatewildly, Sky Blue Pete and 2 others

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:00 PM
  • #55,564
Sky Blue Pete said:

Angela Rayner resignation letter and Sir Keir Starmer reply in full

Rayner says she "deeply regrets" her conduct over Hove property, while PM says he's "very sad".
www.bbc.co.uk

Self referred - imagine Johnson Hancock or Farage tice and Lowe doing such a thing no nor me
Click to expand...
She had zero choice on the matter, once her tax avoiding had come to light she could refer herself, or face the embarrassing situation of having the opposition do it for her.

She had no where else to go.
She even tried the low down trick on blaming it on her legal advisors advice but thankfully they came out publicly and denied giving any such advice. Imagine the damage that could of done to the reputation of that legal company!

What does that tell you about Angela Rayner?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:03 PM
  • #55,565
Sky Blue Pete said:

Angela Rayner resignation letter and Sir Keir Starmer reply in full

Rayner says she "deeply regrets" her conduct over Hove property, while PM says he's "very sad".
www.bbc.co.uk

Self referred - imagine Johnson Hancock or Farage tice and Lowe doing such a thing no nor me
Click to expand...

Self-referred after the story broke. Resigned before the journalists dig deeper into the sale of her share of the property to her son’s trust because outlets are reporting something dodgy is at play there.

It’s a classic case of damage control. She let her colleagues embarrass themselves defending her saying she hadn’t done anything wrong. The went on national TV to say she acted on ‘legal advice’ for her solicitors to deny that was the case hours later.

Take your pick: she lied or that incompetent that she didn’t realise what was going on. She isn’t a stupid person so it’s almost definitely the case she lied.

It’s a shame she’s had to resign because politics needs more ‘normal’ people but I’ll have no sympathy for a politician who aggressively called out peers over similar issues to resign.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
S

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:04 PM
  • #55,566
Grendel said:
She said she did seek expert tax advice
Click to expand...

This is from her resignation letter:



She was apparently advised by two of her professional advisers (one being the conveyancers who acted on the purchase of the Hove property, the other being presumably the solictors to the trust) to seek specialist tax advice but she failed to do so.

It is coming across, rightly or wrongly, as more an issue of competence than dishonesty. We may never know the truth.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:07 PM
  • #55,567
SkyBlueDom26 said:
I’d be ashamed to admit I even voted them, they are a joke
Click to expand...
Same could be said for any party currently

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: oscillatewildly

SIR ERNIE

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:11 PM
  • #55,568
Sbarcher said:
Wonder who Starmer will appoint for DPM to take PMQs when he’s putting the rest of the world to rights.
Click to expand...

Lammy?
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy
S

StrettoBoy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:15 PM
  • #55,569
Sbarcher said:
Wonder who Starmer will appoint for DPM to take PMQs when he’s putting the rest of the world to rights.
Click to expand...

The field of competent candidates is a small one.

My money is on Pat McFadden.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:20 PM
  • #55,570
Kill two birds with one stone - get Jezza on board. It'll be a LOL and Labour might lose the next election by a bit less.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:22 PM
  • #55,571
StrettoBoy said:
The field of competent candidates is a small one.

My money is on Pat McFadden.
Click to expand...
Met him a few times. Decent bloke.
 

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:23 PM
  • #55,572
Mucca Mad Boys said:
The true scandal might not even be the stamp duty btw. There's something potentially v dodgy going on with her house as the £650k valuation that was used to sell her share is close to double similar properties in their area.
Click to expand...

So you believe Shoosmiths are complicit in this swindle?

All of the strange bluster seems to be about the valuation being on the IHT threshold, but I’m struggling to see what relevance that has to anything.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:29 PM
  • #55,573
Ccfcisparks said:
Met him a few times. Decent bloke.
Click to expand...
Don't know him, but I have an image in my head of a cross between Eastenders character and actor - Pat Butcher and Steve McFadden. My headspace is a dark place where nobody really wants to be!!
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:32 PM
  • #55,574
Mucca Mad Boys said:
The true scandal might not even be the stamp duty btw. There's something potentially v dodgy going on with her house as the £650k valuation that was used to sell her share is close to double similar properties in their area.

The fundamental difference is that in opposition, Labour made a play of how they were bringing back 'integrity' to politics. Starmer himself backed himself in a corner by saying he'd sack people on the spot for misbehaving. Rayner herself called for many, many Tory ministers to resign and constantly sung the 'one rule for them, one rule for us'... Well, time to practice what you preach.

Rayner was up to something, didn't seek proper tax advice and got caught out. That fact is somehow worse - it's incompetent.

The electorate can see Labour is looking to increase taxes so when a senior government figure plays fast and loose with the laws, people aren't looking at that too kindly.

In my view, this government will start to splinter because losing Rayner is actually huge loss for Starmer.
Click to expand...
More or less what Farage said on that clip of him I posted a bit earlier, he also noted that Labour will now need to have an election for deputy leader and that will result in some rather public in fighting. Though I do note the post was vacant between Watson resigning and Rayner becoming deputy leader so Starmer might just let that situation reoccur.

Deputy PM is a different position, David Lammy or Ed Milliband anyone.

Other commentators have also speculated that the markets may force a general election if Reeves fails to get the bond rates down.

It's a shambles.
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 2:39 PM
Reactions: Sick Boy

Earlsdon_Skyblue1

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:37 PM
  • #55,575
There are a few people seemingly struggling with this news, but this goes a lot deeper than left versus right or whatever.

The fact of the matter is that we have such low quality politicians, with many of them not only thinking they are above the average person, but also act with such little integrity. They have also created an environment where there is such a low tolerance for making a mistake, or having a tough point of view. If I forget to pay council tax, or accidentally drive into a bus lane - no one will show you any mercy. That’s the system our politicians built. So when they bend the rules, whether it was a mistake or not, of course the public is furious. Especially when they initially try and wriggle out of it.

Frankly, they should be a lot more careful when it comes to things like this. There are many politicians from an abundance of parties that cannot be trusted, including the Conservatives, and many of the ones found in the European Union too. There should be zero tolerance and it doesn't matter who you vote for.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete, Moff, rob9872 and 2 others
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:37 PM
  • #55,576
rob9872 said:
Don't know him, but I have an image in my head of a cross between Eastenders character and actor - Pat Butcher and Steve McFadden. My headspace is a dark place where nobody really wants to be!!
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: rob9872 and mmttww

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:41 PM
  • #55,577
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Click to expand...

Downloaded to be used a lot. Thanks in advance!
 
Reactions: Brighton Sky Blue

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:41 PM
  • #55,578
Earlsdon_Skyblue1 said:
There are a few people seemingly struggling with this news, but this goes a lot deeper than left versus right or whatever.

The fact of the matter is that we have such low quality politicians, with many of them not only thinking they are above the average person, but also act with such little integrity. They have also created an environment where there is such a low tolerance for making a mistake, or having a tough point of view. If I forget to pay council tax, or accidentally drive into a bus lane - no one will show you any mercy. That’s the system our politicians built. So when they bend the rules, whether it was a mistake or not, of course the public is furious. Especially when they initially try and wriggle out of it.

Frankly, they should be a lot more careful when it comes to things like this. There are many politicians from an abundance of parties that cannot be trusted, including the Conservatives, and many of the ones found in the European Union too. There should be zero tolerance and it doesn't matter who you vote for.
Click to expand...
She had nowhere to go after screaming like a stuck pig at the tories over their dubious behaviour for 14 years.

What made her situation completely untenable was blaming her legal council for wrong advice, only for them to come out publicly and say she's lieing.

You live by the sword, you die by the sword.
 
Reactions: DT-R

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 2:56 PM
  • #55,579
Captain Dart said:
More or less what Farage said on that clip of him I posted a bit earlier, he also noted that Labour will now need to have an election for deputy leader and that will result in some rather public in fighting. Though I do note the post was vacant between Watson resigning and Rayner becoming deputy leader so Starmer might just let that situation reoccur.

Deputy PM is a different position, David Lammy or Ed Milliband anyone.

Other commentators have also speculated that the markets may force a general election if Reeves fails to get the bond rates down.

It's a shambles.
Click to expand...
Looking at how many ‘resets’ this government had and recent history with the Tories, this government doesn’t get to 2028 imo. Frankly, a general election next year in 2026 isn’t an outlandish view to have anymore.
 
Reactions: PVA, SBT, Sky Blue Pete and 1 other person

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Yesterday at 3:07 PM
  • #55,580
Captain Dart said:
More or less what Farage said on that clip of him I posted a bit earlier, he also noted that Labour will now need to have an election for deputy leader and that will result in some rather public in fighting. Though I do note the post was vacant between Watson resigning and Rayner becoming deputy leader so Starmer might just let that situation reoccur.

Deputy PM is a different position, David Lammy or Ed Milliband anyone.

Other commentators have also speculated that the markets may force a general election if Reeves fails to get the bond rates down.

It's a shambles.
Click to expand...
There's next to no chance of a GE being called.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 1586
  • 1587
  • 1588
  • 1589
  • 1590
  • 1591
  • 1592
Next
First Prev 1588 of 1592 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • SBT1 minute ago
  • SBAndy5 minutes ago
  • Marty6 minutes ago
  • Ian177911 minutes ago
  • ... and 6 more.
  • Total: 23 (members: 10, guests: 13)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • General Discussion
    • Off Topic Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?