Do you want to discuss boring politics? (55 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Social media limits for children are being planned by the government to tackle "compulsive" screen time, the technology secretary has told Sky News.

Peter Kyle said he was concerned about "the overall amount of time kids spend on these apps" as well as the content they see.

A two-hour cap per platform is being seriously considered after meetings with current and former employees of tech companies. A night-time or school-time curfew has also been discussed.

Children would be blocked from accessing apps such as TikTok or Snapchat once they have hit the limit, rather than just reminded of how long they have been scrolling, it is understood.

An announcement on screen time is expected this autumn.
There's definitely no way kids will work out a way round this. In what world is kids having secret handsets and secret accounts that parents have no oversight over going to improve things?
 

Nick

Administrator
View attachment 44736

Fashionable cause, amirite? You talk some sh*te.

Well yeah because this is the current awful situation in the news.

Something else will eventually take over the news space and you will all forget and move onto that.

Not sure what your screenshot was meant to prove. People are spending their time looking for footage, videos and news articles about it.

There are multiple wars going on around the world, Ukraine isn't as fashionable nowadays and sudan and Yemen arent in the charts.
 

Nick

Administrator
Saw some horrific footage today of a father queueing for aid for his family just dropping down dead in the queue. I don't know how people can not be impacted by this kind of thing and just brush it off and move on with their day.
Genuinely though, why look for footage? There have been people dying in awful circumstances all of my life and no doubt the same for everybody else.

Yeah there's the internet now but why spend time looking for it and watching it if it is going to impact your day?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Explains why he’s thick as pig shit then.


The law is “property damage” from what I can see neither JSO nor XR broke £500k, though I’ve not idea if there’s a legal limit that makes it “serious property damage” £7m is on another planet. You’re also interfering with the defence of the UK, so if a govt lawyer wanted could argue the harms could be incalculable.

Same Q though, I can buy removing property damage or setting the bar differently, but would we be happy with Islamic terrorists not being charged just because they only destroyed millions?

I dunno, I’m not sure there’s a way to square it that leaves terror laws intact and allows extreme direct action. Personally I’d be happy to rip the terror laws up, but I don’t have the British press at my door and aren’t responsible for the safety of the UK.
More people were killed in terror attacks on the UK mainland in the 10 years following the Terrorism Act than the preceding 10 years.
It is funny somebody is a fence sitter because they won't say what you want them to 🤣
I don't know why somebody as facile as you comes on to this thread. You are somebody who has said before "they're all the same" aren't you?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Genuinely though, why look for footage? There have been people dying in awful circumstances all of my life and no doubt the same for everybody else.

Yeah there's the internet now but why spend time looking for it and watching it if it is going to impact your day?
Why do you post about various kids who have been neglected and abused to death by their parents? There are plenty of other kids dying in the world, why do you only post about them?
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
Not sure what your screenshot was meant to prove.

that you might want to rethink referring to kids being starved to death by a country that we support and arm as 'fashionable'.

You're dismissive of people being angry or giving a sh*t about this which is pretty weird for a start, but the hypocrisy of it is just grim.

Like someone pointed out, you've no issue posting bits from the same news cycle when it's something you want to talk about.

and the 'why aren't you talking about every awful thing at once at the same volume' argument to criticise others is pathetic.

Does any of it make what's happening right now in Gaza and Palestine less terrible or less worthy of being talked about? FFS.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Genuinely though, why look for footage? There have been people dying in awful circumstances all of my life and no doubt the same for everybody else.

Yeah there's the internet now but why spend time looking for it and watching it if it is going to impact your day?
Better for people to care about something than nothing. It might seem weird to you and that’s fine, but it also seems understandable that others are affected by human suffering, especially one that’s disproportionately hitting children.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
More people were killed in terror attacks on the UK mainland in the 10 years following the Terrorism Act than the preceding 10 years.

You appear to be under the impression I agree with the Terrorism Act. As opposed to understanding that it is law.

Sadly came across this this morning, it’s a bit old now, what’s happening in NI makes me genuinely ashamed to be British and maybe it’s my bubble but seems totally ignored. I never thought we were the types to be running racist pogroms. But: just property damage right. No people even close to hurt. Probably less damage in terms of value than PA did.

Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.

Edit: wrong link hang on. Sadly multiple places set on fire

Edit edit: seems I was misinformed the arson was in Ireland not part of the recent NI stuff, still:


Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.
 

Nuskyblue

Well-Known Member
There's definitely no way kids will work out a way round this. In what world is kids having secret handsets and secret accounts that parents have no oversight over going to improve things?
The limit is 2hr per app isn't it, if so it's pointless.

TikToc
Snapchat
Instagram
Facebook
WhatsApp
Telegram

There is 12 hours there. The kids won't even have to find a way around it!
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
The limit is 2hr per app isn't it, if so it's pointless.

TikToc
Snapchat
Instagram
Facebook
WhatsApp
Telegram

There is 12 hours there. The kids won't even have to find a way around it!
How would it even work, per device, per app, per account? what if its a family ipad, does it lock up when Dad wants to check twitter if the kids have been on it for 2 hours?

Been a long time since I worked on any projects that involved child protection but when I did one of the first things parents were told, particular parents of girls, is that they will 100% have more than one account on each app, the one you know about and monitor and at least one that you don't know about. Trying to hammer home to parents who would always be 'my daughter isn't like that' that they are all doing it, secret accounts that only their mates know about.

I just don't see any practical way this works without it ending up like what they've forced upon reddit. They've bought in age verification checks and now there's loads of subreddits, that are in no way adult content, that people can't access without supplying a copy of their driving license or passport. Absolute fucking mess.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
You appear to be under the impression I agree with the Terrorism Act. As opposed to understanding that it is law.

Sadly came across this this morning, it’s a bit old now, what’s happening in NI makes me genuinely ashamed to be British and maybe it’s my bubble but seems totally ignored. I never thought we were the types to be running racist pogroms. But: just property damage right. No people even close to hurt. Probably less damage in terms of value than PA did.

Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.

Edit: wrong link hang on. Sadly multiple places set on fire

Edit edit: seems I was misinformed the arson was in Ireland not part of the recent NI stuff, still:


Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.
All on starmer I’m sure
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
How would it even work, per device, per app, per account? what if its a family ipad, does it lock up when Dad wants to check twitter if the kids have been on it for 2 hours?

Been a long time since I worked on any projects that involved child protection but when I did one of the first things parents were told, particular parents of girls, is that they will 100% have more than one account on each app, the one you know about and monitor and at least one that you don't know about. Trying to hammer home to parents who would always be 'my daughter isn't like that' that they are all doing it, secret accounts that only their mates know about.

I just don't see any practical way this works without it ending up like what they've forced upon reddit. They've bought in age verification checks and now there's loads of subreddits, that are in no way adult content, that people can't access without supplying a copy of their driving license or passport. Absolute fucking mess.
Worth trying though no?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
There's definitely no way kids will work out a way round this. In what world is kids having secret handsets and secret accounts that parents have no oversight over going to improve things?
Or alternatively, just get parents to have the common sense to confiscate devices when they see fit
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
You appear to be under the impression I agree with the Terrorism Act. As opposed to understanding that it is law.

Sadly came across this this morning, it’s a bit old now, what’s happening in NI makes me genuinely ashamed to be British and maybe it’s my bubble but seems totally ignored. I never thought we were the types to be running racist pogroms. But: just property damage right. No people even close to hurt. Probably less damage in terms of value than PA did.

Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.

Edit: wrong link hang on. Sadly multiple places set on fire

Edit edit: seems I was misinformed the arson was in Ireland not part of the recent NI stuff, still:


Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.
Burning down a building creates genuine and known risk to life.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Genuinely though, why look for footage? There have been people dying in awful circumstances all of my life and no doubt the same for everybody else.

Yeah there's the internet now but why spend time looking for it and watching it if it is going to impact your day?
Don't go looking for footage, its in the news. I like to try and keep on top of what is happening in the world, as I'm sure many people do. Not like I'm searching stuff out or going to weird and wonderful twitter and YouTube account.

I think it resonates with a lot of people because Israel is seen as a fairly westernised country. They're members of UEFA, compete in Eurovision etc. Rightly or wrongly that causes a different reaction to what is happening somewhere like Myanmar.

When you add in the role the UK is playing in supporting Israel and the refusal of our government to take any action against the invading country, in stark contrast to the situation in Ukraine, and the impression that the government is also clamping down on any dissenting voices, it all adds up to keep it in the spotlight.

Also think as many horrific things as there are happening around the world there's not many instances where the entire population of a country is to all intents and purposes forced to remain in that country while systematically being bombed, shot dead and starved. There was a report from a hospital this week where the doctors were talking about how every day the people coming in had been shot in different places, basically the IDF playing a game where they pick a different body part to target everyday. When you hear things like that on the news most people would be outraged and find it hard to even digest what they are hearing.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
You appear to be under the impression I agree with the Terrorism Act. As opposed to understanding that it is law.

Sadly came across this this morning, it’s a bit old now, what’s happening in NI makes me genuinely ashamed to be British and maybe it’s my bubble but seems totally ignored. I never thought we were the types to be running racist pogroms. But: just property damage right. No people even close to hurt. Probably less damage in terms of value than PA did.

Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.

Edit: wrong link hang on. Sadly multiple places set on fire

Edit edit: seems I was misinformed the arson was in Ireland not part of the recent NI stuff, still:


Why is this not justifiable direct action? If you asked the people responsible they would view their cause as just and existential with full certainty.
Presume you're talking about the horrific targeting of refuges with people setting fire to homes and hotels. Not sure I'd really class that purely as properly damage, or direct action, to me you're in the area of attempted murder.

Interestingly I've seen it reported that the police are reluctant to get involved, unless it reaches a point where they have no other option, because those undertaking the violence are backed by the UDA and UVF. They are of course both proscribed groups.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
I think it resonates with a lot of people because Israel is seen as a fairly westernised country. They're members of UEFA, compete in Eurovision etc. Rightly or wrongly that causes a different reaction to what is happening somewhere like Myanmar.

When you add in the role the UK is playing in supporting Israel and the refusal of our government to take any action against the invading country, in stark contrast to the situation in Ukraine, and the impression that the government is also clamping down on any dissenting voices, it all adds up to keep it in the spotlight.

This. Great post, makes a lot of great points.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
How would it even work, per device, per app, per account? what if its a family ipad, does it lock up when Dad wants to check twitter if the kids have been on it for 2 hours?

Been a long time since I worked on any projects that involved child protection but when I did one of the first things parents were told, particular parents of girls, is that they will 100% have more than one account on each app, the one you know about and monitor and at least one that you don't know about. Trying to hammer home to parents who would always be 'my daughter isn't like that' that they are all doing it, secret accounts that only their mates know about.

I just don't see any practical way this works without it ending up like what they've forced upon reddit. They've bought in age verification checks and now there's loads of subreddits, that are in no way adult content, that people can't access without supplying a copy of their driving license or passport. Absolute fucking mess.
Worth trying though no?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top