Why you getting upset over an Internet forum bud? It’s a lovely day, get yourself down the pub.
Parks is a nasty piece of work. Attempts to bully Dom on here and throws insults out all the time. Then he’s the first crying on the mental health threads. Hypocrite
I’m sure they have the fruit shoots chilling for you ready in the fridgeGoing over after the footy still a bit rough from last night. Hair of the dog and all that though
I’m sure they have the fruit shoots chilling for you ready in the fridge
Doesn’t the pot call the kettle black? You should be careful with saying things like that after what you’ve been saying on here recently.
I’m younger than you, you little scampFruit shoot? Bloody hell you’re old do they even sell them anymore?
I’m younger than you, you little scamp
Why's that mate? Insinuating I'm racist again.
What have I said that is racist?
Yeah and I was 10. Get down the pub lad, its a nice day.It says you joined in 2011. I was only 11 then
Yeah and I was 10. Get down the pub lad, its a nice day.
Will you be my friend? I need someone to go down the pub withWhat do you get out of lying on a forum? Tragic, I guess it’s hard at your age to make friends ey
You’re imagining things now mate. Have a lie down in the sun
Will you be my friend? I need someone to go down the pub with
So you agree I'm not remotely racist. Got there in the end.
I’m not going to repeat the things you have said as they could be turned as if I have said them. But your comments on women, Europeans and over 50’s are appalling and I’m ashamed that you’re a Coventry fan. I would like you to be banned but I guess freedom of speech means you’re able to express these horrific views. Will have to put you on ignore I’m sorry
I wonder who paid for it.Yeah but he got married yesterday.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Come on, how is he supposed to know?I wonder who paid for it.
Said Boris Johnson.
You are stinking this place out.When @Skybluefaz opens the nonce thread
The apprenticeships scheme is an absolute scam IMO. Subsidises firms to employ staff on less than minimum wage on the promise of non-existent jobs when the apprenticeship ends. My company now has about 50% of its client facing staff from this scheme, they've replaced full time, salaried positions. There's no training plan for them, they just have to google stuff and try and work it out for themselves. While they are nice enough people they have zero clue how to do the job so their work flows up the chain to my team.Imagine if Diane Abbot...
BBC said:Peter Cheese, chief executive of the CIPD, said: "On all key measures the apprenticeship levy has failed and is even acting to constrain firms' investment in apprenticeships and skills more broadly.
"It appears to have achieved the opposite of its policy objectives. Without reform it will act as a handbrake on employer investment in skills, damaging firms' ability to recover from the pandemic."
The apprenticeships scheme is an absolute scam IMO. Subsidises firms to employ staff on less than minimum wage on the promise of non-existent jobs when the apprenticeship ends. My company now has about 50% of its client facing staff from this scheme, they've replaced full time, salaried positions. There's no training plan for them, they just have to google stuff and try and work it out for themselves. While they are nice enough people they have zero clue how to do the job so their work flows up the chain to my team.
The cost of their education is paid to the FE college by the tax payer, a middleman company is paid by the taxpayer to run the apprenticeship schemes and their wages are also subsidised by the taxpayer. Who is benefitting from this?
At least in the industry I work in, and I suspect others are the same, it has reduced the number of people employed in actual jobs and has helped to suppress wages.
The apprenticeships scheme is an absolute scam IMO. Subsidises firms to employ staff on less than minimum wage on the promise of non-existent jobs when the apprenticeship ends. My company now has about 50% of its client facing staff from this scheme, they've replaced full time, salaried positions. There's no training plan for them, they just have to google stuff and try and work it out for themselves. While they are nice enough people they have zero clue how to do the job so their work flows up the chain to my team.
The cost of their education is paid to the FE college by the tax payer, a middleman company is paid by the taxpayer to run the apprenticeship schemes and their wages are also subsidised by the taxpayer. Who is benefitting from this?
At least in the industry I work in, and I suspect others are the same, it has reduced the number of people employed in actual jobs and has helped to suppress wages.
Don't see any reason you couldn't do what you suggest. There's already different terms for apprentices so thats not the issue.Interesting you say that, and I’ve heard similar criticisms over the last few years. Just thinking logically, could it be reformed so that companies have to pay up the wages and then get a grant once the employee is signed up to a full-time contract? Could it be that apprenticeship contracts could carry more employment weight than standard contracts to ensure employees are not immediately got rid of? I don’t know enough about employment law but surely there’s ways around this type of thing if there’s the will to.
Don't see any reason you couldn't do what you suggest. There's already different terms for apprentices so thats not the issue.
Whats minimum wage now, £8 something, apprentices are on £4.15 plus you get a grant (£1,000?) per apprentice. From what I've seen the system is designed to get people off the jobless figures and funnel taxpayer money into companies who manage apprenticeships.
Of course if you had to guarantee a job at the end the number of companies taking on apprentices would crash.
Don't see any reason you couldn't do what you suggest. There's already different terms for apprentices so thats not the issue.
Whats minimum wage now, £8 something, apprentices are on £4.15 plus you get a grant (£1,000?) per apprentice. From what I've seen the system is designed to get people off the jobless figures and funnel taxpayer money into companies who manage apprenticeships.
Of course if you had to guarantee a job at the end the number of companies taking on apprentices would crash.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?