What's the point? It's already known to Sisu that more of us won't be going than will. Other than it getting on TV what good will us standing outside really do? F*ck that, I'll be in the pub having a few beers instead. Note that I won't be in the ground.
Just accept that it's SISU' club and whilst they are there we will not be.
still think a pitch sit in when the cameras are at shitfields will do the job...match delayed or even abandoned would screw up tv schedules etc.
know all about the possible match banning orders but would they actually do it if enough people got on the pitch....just my opinion of course
I think the sit on the pitch idea is the best. I suggested this weeks ago and got severely criticised however its good to see it resurfacing. This will be a different approach on sky sports what more could we do? We have to target that game and make our voices heard. Its clear our current approach (NOPM) is falling on deaf ears
I think the sit on the pitch idea is the best. I suggested this weeks ago and got severely criticised however its good to see it resurfacing. This will be a different approach on sky sports what more could we do? We have to target that game and make our voices heard. Its clear our current approach (NOPM) is falling on deaf ears
Do not agree, want the stadium empty, we do not want to be seen as thugs just genuine supporters who care.
This is an illegal act and therefore something I can't condone.
I suppose though the first sky game to be abandoned may make an interesting pr story..,,,
Am I right in thinking that those posting such calls for aggressive action are the ones who have only recently been members of this forum?
still think a pitch sit in when the cameras are at shitfields will do the job...match delayed or even abandoned would screw up tv schedules etc.
know all about the possible match banning orders but would they actually do it if enough people got on the pitch....just my opinion of course
yup, do something that they cannot ignore.
Dress up in Mr. Blobby costumes with enormous dildos, and pogo-stick over the roofs of the stands into the ground from the top of the hill.
Yet you supported Sisu breaking their rental contract and said 'contacts are made for breaking' to justify it. Hypocrite.This is an illegal act and therefore something I can't condone.
I suppose though the first sky game to be abandoned may make an interesting pr story..,,,
Who gives a shit?Am I right in thinking that those posting such calls for aggressive action are the ones who have only recently been members of this forum?
Yet you supported Sisu breaking their rental contract and said 'contacts are made for breaking' to justify it. Hypocrite.
I think the sit on the pitch idea is the best. I suggested this weeks ago and got severely criticised however its good to see it resurfacing. This will be a different approach on sky sports what more could we do? We have to target that game and make our voices heard. Its clear our current approach (NOPM) is falling on deaf ears
i have an issue with going to jimmy's hill as it say we dont want to travel to northampton for our home games but we will travel there anyway. however on this occasion as the TV crews are going to be there it makes sense to me as a good oppurtunity to be heard.
on all other occasions i think we would be better turning up at the ricoh on mass on home match days, everyone ring the ccfc ticket office and ask why the doors aint open yet and listen to the match on radio's while seeing if we can get local media to cover it.
With Tim fisher masks onimagine a 100 mr blobbys refusing to move on pitch? sky would not hand it back to presenters thats for sure, it would be a ratings hit.
Controversial it may be - but actions and disruption speak louder than words - look at the fracking protest - got coverage because of disruption this week (and a rouge MP)
A sit in will create media interest, some positive and some negative. Minor protests and media hasn't achieved anything major so far - CITY ARE F!CKING PLAYING IN NORTHAMPTON AND THERE IS A MASSIVE STADIUM FOR US IN COVENTRY, - protests haven't worked so far..
My personal carefully worded thought on this is that a mass pitch invasion sit in would create general positive publicity and lets face it would give Sky a better story than a nil nil draw against Sheff United in League 1. It would have to be en-mass though possibly with everyone wearing Joy Sepala/Tim Fisher/Greg Clarke Masks.
The issue of paying to get in versus media attention recieved is a difficult one to weigh-up, but city fans would be paying for just one game and that could be justified by the publicity recieved. For the hill protest - remember this is an evening game and city fans would be in the dark, so won't be effective for filming/photo opportunities...
Disclaimer:
I personally do not condone a pitch invasion and do not encourage other city fans to do this....
Remember the coverage the Liverpool beach ball got!
For a one off game, maybe we fill the ground but don't turn up till 10 mins before KO.
All walk from the hill together and pay on the gate meaning a possible late KO. Once the game is on we DON'T INVADE THE PITCH,
but throw Sky Blue beach balls on with keep CCFC in Cov wrote on them.
I
All peaceful and breaking no laws.
So delayed KO and then stoppages during the game.
Just don't think pitch invasions are the correct way to go, peaceful or not they are breaking the rules,
why break the rules when one of the things we are complaining about is SISU and the FL breaking the rules.
I like this idea but not beach balls as they old just burst them, throw toilet rolls, 100s of them. Have you seen how much mess and time it takes to pick up wet loo roll off grass.?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?