Cyrus Christie (6 Viewers)

Forums New posts
pusbccfc

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
SkyBlue_Bear83

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Yea he looked very good on the FL show, shame he never showed it much last season. I don't want to question his commitment but was his heart really in it, considering the state the club was in and that he had already decided he was leaving?
 
dancers lance

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
Yep, I have a good mate who is Derby fan and he said he was different class today (after saying he was shite last week) apparently he was quick, cutting inside and looked a threat all day.
 
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
I posted before his attribute are championship and higher his final ball and decision making were in question,, better players, better coaching and in a team that are confident will allow Christie to progress quickly... Do not be shocked if they don't get promotion he finds his way on a premiership squad very soon...
 
mark82

mark82

Super Moderator
Has always had a lot of potential. Had a bad 6 months after deciding he was leaving, but before that he looked very good.
 
hill83

hill83

Well-Known Member
Always rated him when I saw him play. Good luck to him.

But in all honesty I couldn't give less of a shit now. He's gone.
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
Always been a great talent. No he is playing in a better team with better players he can only improve. Good luck to him.
 
R

RFC

Well-Known Member
Was at Derby in the opening day and he fitted in very well and think they'll be in the promotion mix.
Leon Best made quite a big impact when he came on too.
PUSB!
 
Sick Boy

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
coop said:
There were 3 ex cov players in that team and they looked good
Click to expand...

Fair play to them.

For our supporters it's more important to consider how nice a person is, rather than focus on ability. Just look at Baker & Thorny for example.

The fact that Baker is described on this forum as one of the best players in League 1 sums it up. Also it is a reminder that a fan owned ccfc would be a disaster. ;)
 
Rusty Trombone

Rusty Trombone

Well-Known Member
Sick Boy said:
Fair play to them.

For our supporters it's more important to consider how nice a person is, rather than focus on ability. Just look at Baker & Thorny for example.

The fact that Baker is described on this forum as one of the best players in League 1 sums it up. Also it is a reminder that a fan owned ccfc would be a disaster. ;)
Click to expand...

The ownership model you're describing (albeit partly in jest) is where one mad (or bonkers) person is in charge, i.e. the one we have now.
 
sw88

sw88

Chief Commentator!
We used to rate him, then last season he went in a bit of a sulk; knew he was moving on on the summer and looked very disinterested.

He's now in a team challenging for promotion (they will be up there IMO) and winning games. Of course he's going to be happier and that will show in his performances
 
D

Deleted member 2477

Guest
30/04/2005 we beat Derby 6-2 in the last game at Highfield Rd.
Both clubs moved stadiums and in my opinion were equal in size and support base.

Its a sad state of affairs when you now look at the difference in the two clubs. 3 ex cov players in their side and probably challenging for promotion from the Championship whilst we have declined to the stage where we lose top players to the likes of Bournemouth.

We seriously need owners who are prepared to invest in our club to get us back to where the City should be.
Unfortunately despite the great news this week lets not forget what SISU have done to this club
 
Sick Boy

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
marcusp said:
30/04/2005 we beat Derby 6-2 in the last game at Highfield Rd.
Both clubs moved stadiums and in my opinion were equal in size and support base.

Its a sad state of affairs when you now look at the difference in the two clubs. 3 ex cov players in their side and probably challenging for promotion from the Championship whilst we have declined to the stage where we lose top players to the likes of Bournemouth.

We seriously need owners who are prepared to invest in our club to get us back to where the City should be.
Unfortunately despite the great news this week lets not forget what SISU have done to this club
Click to expand...

Where exactly should the club be? There is still a lot of arrogance amongst our support. We are not a big club and have no right to be in any league.

Also why should an individual/group invest their money to make fans happy? Do you mean via loans? Or just pouring money into the club with nothing in return.

Some never learn eh?
 
S

Seaside-Skyblue

Well-Known Member
I think Coventry is still classed as a big club. Yes its in the lower leagues but its still a large club or should I say potential to be a large one. Coventry is a large city and has a big catchment area compared to a lot. Maybe its easier to see when living outside of Coventry how big the club is. Many people I know consider us punching way below where we should be. Out of interest, do people see a big club as a successful one? I see the two phrases entirely different although being successful does maximise the fan base. But I see Cov, Leicester, Birmingham, Derby all in similiar bracket in terms of "potential size"
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
marcusp said:
30/04/2005 we beat Derby 6-2 in the last game at Highfield Rd.
Both clubs moved stadiums and in my opinion were equal in size and support base.

Its a sad state of affairs when you now look at the difference in the two clubs. 3 ex cov players in their side and probably challenging for promotion from the Championship whilst we have declined to the stage where we lose top players to the likes of Bournemouth.

We seriously need owners who are prepared to invest in our club to get us back to where the City should be.
Unfortunately despite the great news this week lets not forget what SISU have done to this club
Click to expand...

You do realise Derby moved to pride park in 1997, not after they played us in 2005....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
stupot07

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Seaside-Skyblue said:
I think Coventry is still classed as a big club. Yes its in the lower leagues but its still a large club or should I say potential to be a large one. Coventry is a large city and has a big catchment area compared to a lot. Maybe its easier to see when living outside of Coventry how big the club is. Many people I know consider us punching way below where we should be. Out of interest, do people see a big club as a successful one? I see the two phrases entirely different although being successful does maximise the fan base. But I see Cov, Leicester, Birmingham, Derby all in similiar bracket in terms of "potential size"
Click to expand...

There's also Forest, wolves, middlesborough, Ipswich, Norwich, Blackburn, Watford, sheff wed, sheff united, Leeds, cardiff, Birmingham, Bolton, Fulham, all in the football league, all biggish clubs all with potential, history or recent successes. Based on attendances brighton should probably be added to that list.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Top