Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Very entertaining finish in store over in the Windies
cricket 2025 (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter tisza
- Start date
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
O
Oh yes
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
The drama and excitement was amazing ,as was the atmosphere This was proper Test cricket,the best form of cricket.
ovduk78
Well-Known Member
WI were 26/9 when I last checked, Starc has 5 & Boland got a hat-trick
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
I remember the days when the West Indies were the best at Test cricket.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
All out for 27, just one run more than the all time Test record
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
NZ hold the record with 26 all out.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
A part of the world with such a rich cricketing heritage, it's not nice to see.
tisza
Well-Known Member
Absolutely. was gripped all day. And good Test cricket is the ultimate form of the game
StrettoBoy
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure we had any more luck than India did.
Yes, Siraj's wicket looked a tad fortunate but Jadeja was arguably lucky to escape being LBW to Woakes on review.
We won because we bowled well and Stokes offered tremendous leadership and worked his socks off. I really think we deserved it.
Last edited:
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
Some of the best test games I've seen are when a team are chasing a low 4 th innings score to win. Like Australia during Bothams ashes series , lost chasing 134 I think and then test at Edgbaston 150. Plus yesterday of course.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Can add Trent Bridge 2005 to that, we squeezed home chasing just 120 something
StrettoBoy
Well-Known Member
I completely agree.
Low scoring test matches are often the best. With the first innings scores tied this was effectively a low scoring one innings match.
It just shows that you don't need batsmen tonking it over the ropes every over for it to be a thriller.
Skyblue Bangkok
Well-Known Member
129 and at one stage England were 116-7 before winning.
SkyBlueSoul
Well-Known Member
They've just released Day 5 tickets for Old Trafford due to demand and all 3 matches going the distance so far. Brother's birthday tomorrow and haven't got him a present yet...
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
It may sound like it but it absolutely wasn't. It was a tense, nailbiting thriller.
It was proper test cricket. The best match I can recall since Edgbaston in 2005 against the Aussies.
Was lucky enough to go 3 of the 4 days of the 2005 Edgbaston Test
tisza
Well-Known Member
Hundred sell-off saved up to six counties from possible collapse, new report finds
The windfall generated by the sale of shares in the eight Hundred franchises may have saved as many as six first-class counties from crisis and possible collapse
Nothing we didn't know. Is it not time to reduce the number full-time counties? Might be harsh but would ease calendar pressure, potentially strengthen level of play by concentrating resources and most obviously bolster remaining counties finances.
They've basically killed the county aspect of cricket anyway - redball attendances gone, 50 over a sideshow with poor attendances, 20/20 being strangled. (Could save 20/20 if less teams)
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
Hundred sell-off saved up to six counties from possible collapse, new report finds
The windfall generated by the sale of shares in the eight Hundred franchises may have saved as many as six first-class counties from crisis and possible collapsewww.theguardian.com
Nothing we didn't know. Is it not time to reduce the number full-time counties? Might be harsh but would ease calendar pressure, potentially strengthen level of play by concentrating resources and most obviously bolster remaining counties finances.
They've basically killed the county aspect of cricket anyway - redball attendances gone, 50 over a sideshow with poor attendances, 20/20 being strangled. (Could save 20/20 if less teams)
Feels inherently ‘unfair’ but equally having 18 counties competing is a bad number to work with. If you could trim it to 16 it means you can have 4 regional groups in the T20 rather than the north/south split which trims the games. 50 over games could be on a pure knockout format.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Feels a bit of a strech to claim the Hundred saved county cricket. This report doesn't tell us anything we don't already know. The test hosting counties make the vast majority of the revenue and the smaller counties are reliant on a revenue split from things like TV rights.Hundred sell-off saved up to six counties from possible collapse, new report finds
The windfall generated by the sale of shares in the eight Hundred franchises may have saved as many as six first-class counties from crisis and possible collapse
Nothing we didn't know. Is it not time to reduce the number full-time counties? Might be harsh but would ease calendar pressure, potentially strengthen level of play by concentrating resources and most obviously bolster remaining counties finances.
They've basically killed the county aspect of cricket anyway - redball attendances gone, 50 over a sideshow with poor attendances, 20/20 being strangled. (Could save 20/20 if less teams)
Its a bit like saying Bournemouth would struggle if they didn't get Sky money!
Its seems like the powers that be are too scared to have the discussion that needs to take place over the long term future of the game at county level which just means they're killing it by pushing the county game to the fringes. Nobody wants to sit at an empty Edgbaston in April freezing to death, in some cases we've literally had snow when games should be on. And they're doing a successful job of killing the Blast so they can bin it off before rebranding the Hundred a T20 competition which I think everyone now accepts is inevitable.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
8 and 8 works but then brings you to your next problem. If the 8 test / hundred hosting grounds bring all the revenue then you want them as your top tier so you're working towards a no promotion / relegation scenario.
A top tier of Warwickshire, Surrey, Lancs, Yorks, Notts, Hampshire and Glamorgan. But then do you go Durham or Middlesex?
Which two teams out of Somerset, Sussex, Derbyshire, Leicestershire, Northants, Essex, Worcester and Glous are you dumping out of county cricket?
Or do you dump a couple into a semi-pro third tier with the 6 MCC universities?
3 tiers of 8 teams where there is a clear pathway, for example Worcester and Loughborough Uni being under the Warwickshire umbrella, might work well for player development without the smaller teams needing to generate revenue to match the big teams but its going to an incredibly hard sell to the members.
tisza
Well-Known Member
It's 2 out of Derby, Leicester, Northants & Gloucester - probably the first 2. But which ever 2 remain are still going to be firmly tied to the bottom of the pyramid due to finances.