covcity4life
Well-Known Member
Fait enough. I said same aftwe thomas messed up 1 on 1 that a quick swap for final 10 mkns might help
Fait enough. I said same aftwe thomas messed up 1 on 1 that a quick swap for final 10 mkns might helpI would have liked to have seen them swap now and then , for a 5 minute burst on each wing. We looked dangerous because of their pace and directness, but the final end product was often poor as they weren't on their wrong side. They both played well yesterday.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I think the article was just fine until they decided to write 'decent, decent, decent' at the end of it all.The cov telegraph on hiwula...
Provided a busy and exciting outlet down the left where he linked up well with the forwards and got some decent balls into the box. Denied by a decent save from the keeper but could have done better with a decent chance when he cut in after the break.
Decent decent decent
That was a decent summery of their article.I think the article was just fine until they decided to write 'decent, decent, decent' at the end of it all.
That's naff and amateurish.
And that's very decent of you to say.That was a decent summery of their article.
The season we went down we had 18 points after 15 games (1.2 points per game) We've reached that after 13 games this time around (1.38 points per game), so an improvement, but not an incredible one.
Wycombe boss makes City prediction etc (click bait link removed)
have a feeling chaplin will score. hopefully we get the 3pts. need to put a run together to break into top 6 mix
Factually incorrect.
The season we went down After 15 games we had 16 points! We didn’t have 18 points.
After 13 games now we have 18 points. At same stage 2 seasons ago we had 12 points and were in 23rd place!
What a silly negative comparison.
Walsall 1-1 Coventry CityWell the attached suggests I was correct. Not sure how it's a 'silly' comparison - we're aiming to improve on the last time we were in this division, and we have on a points per game basis, but not to an outstanding degree. How is that wrong / negative?
Transfermarkt can be all over the place. I've fallen for it before too.Well the attached suggests I was correct. Not sure how it's a 'silly' comparison - we're aiming to improve on the last time we were in this division, and we have on a points per game basis, but not to an outstanding degree. How is that wrong / negative?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?