Are they going to spit out the new "evidence" or not?
Something myself & other have mentioned before and been lambasted for.
Continuing litigation is no good for anyone, least of all the fans.
You could go football income and expenditure to CCFC, Rugby in and out to wasps... all others split down the middleNot sure how a 50/50 would work? Unless it was run by people inside the club who seem to have a good working relationship.
You could go football income and expenditure to CCFC, Rugby in and out to wasps... all others split down the middle
I don't buy it ,it's to the death I thinkDoesn’t make sense though. Joy had the then council leader in her office and was unwilling to make an offer for100% of ACL with a smaller debt burden than it has now but they would consider getting into a 50/50 arrangement now with Wasps with an even higher debt burden, presumably that will grow again if it’s ordered that the council will need to be paid an extra £27M somehow and then SISU will share the running costs, costs of servicing debt etc. Looking at the last accounts ACL doesn’t look viable now let alone with 50/50 ownership. I’m starting to think this line is empty rhetoric.
Doesn’t make sense though. Joy had the then council leader in her office and was unwilling to make an offer for100% of ACL with a smaller debt burden than it has now but they would consider getting into a 50/50 arrangement now with Wasps with an even higher debt burden, presumably that will grow again if it’s ordered that the council will need to be paid an extra £27M somehow and then SISU will share the running costs, costs of servicing debt etc. Looking at the last accounts ACL doesn’t look viable now let alone with 50/50 ownership. I’m starting to think this line is empty rhetoric.
Its the second half, the score is 0-0 and we're just about to go to VAR.As I cant be bothered to read the endless posts of hypothetical possibilities and legal rhetoric, can anyone tell me what the latest score is?
It would be cheaper for Richardson to fold Wasps and walk away/QUOTE]
It will get interesting soon. The judge will order Joy to immediately marry Nick Eastwood. Just before they are about to tie the knot Timmy will pop out from under the judge's desk with a fresh 'milk' moustache before murdering everyone in the room Game of Thrones style. Boddy will then arrive on horseback, swinging Fisher on to the back and riding off towards a Ricoh Arena silhouetted by the setting sun, keys to the stadium jingling round his neck.This is the first time I've ever taken an interest in a court case thread.
It will get interesting soon. The judge will order Joy to immediately marry Nick Eastwood. Just before they are about to tie the knot Timmy will pop out from under the judge's desk with a fresh 'milk' moustache before murdering everyone in the room Game of Thrones style. Boddy will then arrive on horseback, swinging Fisher on to the back and riding off towards a Ricoh Arena silhouetted by the setting sun, keys to the stadium jingling round his neck.
As I cant be bothered to read the endless posts of hypothetical possibilities and legal rhetoric, can anyone tell me what the latest score is?
Seems like a bore draw at HT to me **yawn**
Here’s hoping there’s a final result in tomorrow’s second half, I’ll even take sudden death in a penalty shootout, just get it over with. Please
Is the judge going to question anything at any point or just allow the lawyers to come out with rubbish like this.Yet they agreed the 250 year lease before Higgs had even supposedly had an offer?
He's working for the BBC now though his tabloid Telegraph esque tweets wouldn't give it awayMore to the point, how come lego-hair is back reporting this? I thought he had jacked this all in?
Are they going to spit out the new "evidence" or not?
As far as I know there was no reason, it was just the way it was decided between Wasps, CCC and Higgs. There was zero chance Wasps purchased the council share not knowing if they would be able to purchase the Higgs share. Equally there was zero chance Higgs would accept our bid for their 50%.What was the reason for CCC having to sell their 50% share to the London rugby club first?
By law CCC would have to extend the lease. And there is a formula to work out the cost of it. Wasps paid the top amount.As far as I know there was no reason, it was just the way it was decided between Wasps, CCC and Higgs. There was zero chance Wasps purchased the council share not knowing if they would be able to purchase the Higgs share. Equally there was zero chance Higgs would accept our bid for their 50%.
Stop making things upBy law CCC would have to extend the lease. And there is a formula to work out the cost of it. Wasps paid the top amount.
Highs wouldn't sell to SISU? They tried enough times. But SISU went back on the agreement made each time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?