Longford
Member
No we hate SISU. Seems some find the difference difficult to understand.....it's not if you try hard.
Wow, you really hate our club don't you? Why are you on here?
If we are talking percentages again i'd say:
85% SISU
15% that obnoxious bitch Lucas and her cunty labour party who pushed it all through to spite not only the hedge fund but OUR club !
No we hate SISU. Seems some find the difference difficult to understand.....it's not if you try hard.
You are reading it wrong geezer, SISU have caused pretty much all this, I hate them most of all but that self serving witch actually purports to act in the best interests of the City..............I went to Rouen last month where they burnt Joan of Arc, it gave me a few ideas !!
The blame game is futile but pleas wake up to the fact that ALL parties are at fault & no one comes out of this debacle with any credit whatsoever!
No, the way you wrote the op makes it seem like that. You didn't just say they have nobody else to blame.So just because I have pointed out that sisu now have no one else to blame for future failures means I want the club to fail?
Why is it for the best of the city? Selling off a profit making, good business for pennies?I you were not a football fan and lookat this you would say she was doing the best for the City of Coventry which is not necessarily the best for Coventry City. As for the Joan of Arc analogy you want to make Ann of Coventry a heroine?
Why is it for the best of the city? Selling off a profit making, good business for pennies?
Funny how those that shouted about that the most also said no one else wanted that shit white Elephant!!! Now shout the most because some one did???Don't understand, it wasn't me who said the council shouldn't be involved with running the Ricoh whether or not it was making a profit was it? Well now the people who were saying that have there wish No of course if you're trying to say that these people were wrong well too late now the council obviously listened they shouldn't have been shouty about it should they?
Why is it for the best of the city? Selling off a profit making, good business for pennies?
Don't understand, it wasn't me who said the council shouldn't be involved with running the Ricoh whether or not it was making a profit was it? Well now the people who were saying that have there wish No of course if you're trying to say that these people were wrong well too late now the council obviously listened they shouldn't have been shouty about it should they?
No, you said she did the best for the city. I asked how?
but some would rather discuss other things that are history.
Right, had enough of this.
The way you avoid making the same mistakes is by looking at history, precedent, trrends...
History is *vitally important* be it looking at a football club moving forward, a city or county's heritage, the way society functions, how houses are built and why they are placed where they are... the systems of power.
I could go on.
Disregard history at your peril, for to do so ensures the same mistakes time and time again. We see that enough here with certain morons demanding the return to the club's board of past failures, of certain morons determining that potential owners of the club with a shocking past track record will suddenly see the light *in the future* and turn things around (to pre-empt the oh so witty aha you mean SISU here jibes well... maybe I do. I could also mean many many many others as well however. SISU do not hold the exclusivity on being incompetent, much as Geoffrey Robinson didn't).
History is what makes the past, present and future. Ignore it and you are a fool.
Deleted member 5849
(proud to be involved in keeping the past alive for future generations!)
Tell SISU.
Don't listen to the hate hate hate hate, just shake it off
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?