jimmyhillsfanclub
Well-Known Member
t'was always the case..
Consumer will pay in the end.
Between,96and 99.5 efficacy.
Rapid Covid tests could be ‘consumer product’, says Dido Harding
Anger as head of UK test-and-trace suggests companies could be charged to find out if staff are infectedamp.ft.com
They can't give that information without giving info on the number of people being tested every day. For some reason they haven't made that available since people started having problems getting tests.Am I missing something, why aren’t we looking at positive cases as a % of tests? Why can’t I find this data anywhere? Surely that omits the effect of having significantly more tests being done now?
That's the thing though, if it's not 100% accurate, so ends up shutting a business down or ruining consumer confidence as it causes a massive outbreak because people let their guard down, it just won't work anyway. Could be a massive disaster in that way. Crowds gathered for a rock concert at the NEC, all return negative tests, but a few people in there with it and passing it on, might not go well...No argument there.
However, Whilst I don't agree on it being a "consumer" product, I have no issue with business paying for it. Why shouldn't they if it enables them to increase their productivity & profitability.
In theory at least, it could also claw back some revenue to help pay for the public & NHS testing
Would that produce potential for 30 or so carrier's based on the prevailing rate among the community?which is why the iIbra system is not a goer.
If you use it on a 70k crowd you are looking at up to 2800 false results.
Im not a fan of sticking stuff on here without proper evidence/being able to back it up, so do take this with a pinch of salt/in the spirit it is being shared. It appears to be similar to what I think was SBD (or was it Pete’s) mate and BSB were saying regarding a vaccine. Interesting read none the less and if you try to keep a positive outlook like I do, maybe chink of light in this weeks dark days of news !
This was on the Wycombe massage board -
‘From my perspective, we are trying to suppress the virus over the winter knowing there is a very high chance of a vaccine over the next 6 months. Results of Phase III studies for both mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Biontech and Moderna) are likely in November, and for the most advanced adenovirus vaccine (AstraZeneca/Oxford), perhaps December. All 3 vaccines have already shown a very strong antibody and T Cell response in Phase I/II, which points to a successful potential vaccine. What actual immunity the vaccine will provide though is the point of contention - hopefully we’ll know this by year’s end with the Phase III results. In my opinion, if the vaccine is safe (and doesn’t cause an infection augmentation, for example - which is almost certain not to happen), the worse case scenario is the patient can still be ‘infected’ but be either asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, but can still pass on the virus. Best case, the vaccine prevents infection as a whole (no infection, cannot pass on). My best guess would be it’ll be somewhere in between. So, in English, if you can mass vaccinate, that would end this pandemic (in the region/country of mass vaccination). Probably annual vaccinations needed (like flu) in high risk individuals going forward.
So, I would expect a FDA/MHRA/EMA approval (or minimum an EUA - Emergency Use Authorisation) for one or more vaccines by December. Then vaccinate high risk (elderly, immune compromised etc) late 2020/early 2021. Then, dependent on manufacture and distribution coherence, full mass vaccination in the Spring.
So, the current agenda, whatever you think of it, to suppress does have an exit strategy. Until then, get used to any football on the TV, and wear a mask when you’re out (it will generally reduce asymptomatic spread to others, and there is growing evidence that although it won’t stop you getting coronavirus, it will reduce the amount of virus you are exposed to, what’s called the viral, and mean you are far more likely to have an asymptomatic or only mildly asymptomatic infection).’
As with so many things what the current situation has exposed is that our 'safety net' isn't fit for purpose. Its certainly not the easy life on benefits some sections of the media like to portray. Simply put even if you received the maximum level of universal credit and housing benefit (only available to renters) it is unlikely to cover the absolute essentials for most people.Starting to think the best option is a temporary massive increase in job seekers benefits (whatever they’re called this week) and let the chips fall where they may.
What does the lack of a license mean in layman's terms?I've posted a few times on here that there is a clear reason why the government is legislating to allow for covid / flu vaccines which do not need to have an MHRA license and this post supports it.
Would that potentially produce
Would that produce potential for 30 or so carrier's based on the prevailing rate among the community?
We don't hear a lot about research into treatment as opposed to vaccine but I would hope that is also taking place and being sufficiently funded. If, as seems increasingly likely, a vaccine that while not preventing you getting covid can lessen the impact can be combined with improvements in treatment then thats a very big positive.Im not a fan of sticking stuff on here without proper evidence/being able to back it up, so do take this with a pinch of salt/in the spirit it is being shared. It appears to be similar to what I think was SBD (or was it Pete’s) mate and BSB were saying regarding a vaccine. Interesting read none the less and if you try to keep a positive outlook like I do, maybe chink of light in this weeks dark days of news !
This was on the Wycombe massage board -
‘From my perspective, we are trying to suppress the virus over the winter knowing there is a very high chance of a vaccine over the next 6 months. Results of Phase III studies for both mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Biontech and Moderna) are likely in November, and for the most advanced adenovirus vaccine (AstraZeneca/Oxford), perhaps December. All 3 vaccines have already shown a very strong antibody and T Cell response in Phase I/II, which points to a successful potential vaccine. What actual immunity the vaccine will provide though is the point of contention - hopefully we’ll know this by year’s end with the Phase III results. In my opinion, if the vaccine is safe (and doesn’t cause an infection augmentation, for example - which is almost certain not to happen), the worse case scenario is the patient can still be ‘infected’ but be either asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, but can still pass on the virus. Best case, the vaccine prevents infection as a whole (no infection, cannot pass on). My best guess would be it’ll be somewhere in between. So, in English, if you can mass vaccinate, that would end this pandemic (in the region/country of mass vaccination). Probably annual vaccinations needed (like flu) in high risk individuals going forward.
So, I would expect a FDA/MHRA/EMA approval (or minimum an EUA - Emergency Use Authorisation) for one or more vaccines by December. Then vaccinate high risk (elderly, immune compromised etc) late 2020/early 2021. Then, dependent on manufacture and distribution coherence, full mass vaccination in the Spring.
So, the current agenda, whatever you think of it, to suppress does have an exit strategy. Until then, get used to any football on the TV, and wear a mask when you’re out (it will generally reduce asymptomatic spread to others, and there is growing evidence that although it won’t stop you getting coronavirus, it will reduce the amount of virus you are exposed to, what’s called the viral, and mean you are far more likely to have an asymptomatic or only mildly asymptomatic infection).’
I've posted a few times on here that there is a clear reason why the government is legislating to allow for covid / flu vaccines which do not need to have an MHRA license and this post supports it.
Sorry, missed the posts Fernando. What’s the reasoning ?
From January 2021, the UK’s licensing authority will have new powers to license all medicines, including vaccines. However, if there is a compelling case, on public health grounds, for using a vaccine before it is given a product licence, given the nature of the threat we face, the JCVI may take the very unusual step of advising the UK government to use a tested, unlicensed vaccine against COVID-19, and we need to make sure that the right legislative measures are in place to deal with that scenario.
What does the lack of a license mean in layman's terms?
Have I missed something?
Wasn't Keir self isolating?
Have I missed something?
Wasn't Keir self isolating?
But ultimately, then, isn't shortcutting the safety procedures, just shortcutting responsibility?It shifts liability from the manufacturer if anything goes wrong. I think liability potentially shifts to the MHRA but not sure completely.
21/09/2020 | 275 |
20/09/2020 | 237 |
19/09/2020 | 204 |
18/09/2020 | 205 |
17/09/2020 | 199 |
16/09/2020 | 183 |
15/09/2020 | 194 |
14/09/2020 | 172 |
13/09/2020 | 153 |
12/09/2020 | 143 |
11/09/2020 | 135 |
10/09/2020 | 143 |
09/09/2020 | 136 |
08/09/2020 | 99 |
07/09/2020 | 84 |
06/09/2020 | 85 |
05/09/2020 | 94 |
04/09/2020 | 67 |
03/09/2020 | 69 |
02/09/2020 | 79 |
01/09/2020 | 58 |
31/08/2020 | 52 |
30/08/2020 | 38 |
Doubling every 10 days or soAh but at least the hospital admissions are stable
England daily admissions since 30 Aug
hopefully for the 5 yearsHave I missed something?
Wasn't Keir self isolating?
Oh well. I'll keep working. My wife will keep working and my kids will keep going to school. Good luck to us all being governed by these fucking morons!Virus is already past control, no way we can get it under control until we have a lock down of some sort, deaths are starting to rise here aswell as Spain and France and 6k cases today is not great, from what they predicted yesterday looks like we're just ahead of the predictions.
Virus is already past control, no way we can get it under control until we have a lock down of some sort, deaths are starting to rise here aswell as Spain and France and 6k cases today is not great, from what they predicted yesterday looks like we're just ahead of the predictions.
Then we make do, I'm lucky enough to work from home but I feel for people who can't.Pretty much but the government do not want to pay the money they will need to support businesses and jobs.
Yeah, some of it might be just (I hope) the backlog of tests being processedToday’s numbers are worrying. Only two days ago Whitty and Valance were telling us that at the current rates numbers were doubling every 7 days and presenting modelling on what that means going forward if we don’t get control of things. Hopefully today is a blip because if not we’re already down to doubling every 4 days and the worst case scenario modelling is looking like best case. Gulp.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?