Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (37 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 845
  • 846
  • 847
  • 848
  • 849
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 847 of 1666 Next Last

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,611
fernandopartridge said:
Anyway, Labour under Starmer has walked into an easy Tory trap. These utterly stupid centrists trying to appeal to people like them.

Click to expand...

What trap? It's a piss poor scheme that even HMRC wouldn't sign off on because it was was not value on the MPM rules.

A tory shouting "opposition for oppositions sake" isn't when the head of HMRC agrees that it is a poor scheme.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,612
More easing, a sign that the Tories want to distract from their terrible 2 days.

Gyms etc should of been opened at the same time pubs were, easier to social distance and prevent excess aerosols there than in the oak at 2am
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,613
Indoor performance spaces still shut, you can socially distance there easily but I guess they don't have the lobby weight that pubs do
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,614
fernandopartridge said:
Anyway, Labour under Starmer has walked into an easy Tory trap. These utterly stupid centrists trying to appeal to people like them.

Click to expand...

If he hadn't it'd be the other side saying 'not questioning government or offering effective opposition'. Either way can't win.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,615
David O'Day said:
What trap? It's a piss poor scheme that even HMRC wouldn't sign off on because it was was not value on the MPM rules.

A tory shouting "opposition for oppositions sake" isn't when the head of HMRC agrees that it is a poor scheme.
Click to expand...
The trap that it appears Labour don't want to help (even if that isn't the case) +. Labour need to tell them it isn't going anywhere near far enough, not about what HMRC say. The public don't care about HMRC. I'm really not sure who this line is trying to appeal to.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,616
fernandopartridge said:
Anyway, Labour under Starmer has walked into an easy Tory trap. These utterly stupid centrists trying to appeal to people like them.

Click to expand...
Labours issue now is that whilst they are trying to appeal to people that don’t vote for them - moderate Tories and centrists (on the face of it making some sense) they are now alienating the core base of their vote that stuck with them in 2019. No point in gaining moderates and centrists because you have an ‘electable’ face if you then lose the others. At the moment we just appear to be heading straight back to 2010-15 with no awareness of why the party was so shit then and no plan. Starmer was supposed to take the good aspects of the Corbyn era (and there was some) and build on them to become an electable force.... there needs to be something more radical economically to get the country back on its feet.
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,617
David O'Day said:
Indoor performance spaces still shut, you can socially distance there easily but I guess they don't have the lobby weight that pubs do
Click to expand...
A big issue here is not only they can't open but they haven't been given a date. A lot of theatres rely on pantos to get them through the year financially and they should be prepping for those now but still don't know if they'll be open so can't get tickets on sale.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,618
Ian1779 said:
Labours issue now is that whilst they are trying to appeal to people that don’t vote for them - moderate Tories and centrists (on the face of it making some sense) they are now alienating the core base of their vote that stuck with them in 2019. No point in gaining moderates and centrists because you have an ‘electable’ face if you then lose the others. At the moment we just appear to be heading straight back to 2010-15 with no awareness of why the party was so shit then and no plan. Starmer was supposed to take the good aspects of the Corbyn era (and there was some) and build on them to become an electable force.... there needs to be something more radical economically to get the country back on its feet.
Click to expand...

Except there is. A vote taken from the Tories, especially in a Lab/Con marginal, is worth twice as much as a vote lost in a safe seat, if not more.

I completely agree we need a radical economic agenda, if only we hadn’t just associated that sort of agenda with Corbyn, who the public hate. Now it’s virtually impossible to raise that without resurrecting the ghost of Corbyn at the same time. I’m not sure you appreciate just how toxic he became with voters. He’s probably set back the left by decades.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,619
fernandopartridge said:
The trap that it appears Labour don't want to help (even if that isn't the case) +. Labour need to tell them it isn't going anywhere near far enough, not about what HMRC say. The public don't care about HMRC. I'm really not sure who this line is trying to appeal to.
Click to expand...

The public do care that the scheme is just giving money to rich people and companies that don't need it while large sectors of the economy get nothing. It appeals to those who still have got nothing from the government and those who's jobs are still on a knife edge.

There is no trap, not even the tories think they have caught Labour in a trap.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,620
shmmeee said:
Except there is. A vote taken from the Tories, especially in a Lab/Con marginal, is worth twice as much as a vote lost in a safe seat, if not more.


I completely agree we need a radical economic agenda, if only we hadn’t just associated that sort of agenda with Corbyn, who the public hate. Now it’s virtually impossible to raise that without resurrecting the ghost of Corbyn at the same time. I’m not sure you appreciate just how toxic he became with voters. He’s probably set back the left by decades.
Click to expand...

Corbyn toxicity with voters stemmed from Brexit and the decision to pursue the PV (championed by Starmer no less) - it allowed the Tories to pin on him that he didn’t respect democracy. To their credit they executed that with aplomb, and once they had that embedded they could chuck anything and everything and it would stick. But the Tories are now rolling out their version of Socialism 2.0 and Labour aren’t even making a noise to say that these are things that sit front and centre of a Labour economic manifesto. Instead they’re too busy alienating BAME voters and members that are deserting the party. What next? The youth vote because we row back on affordable housing or green issues?

They are in danger of being outflanked on the left by the Lib Dems who have finally realised that their success under Kennedy in early 2000’s came from being in the left side of the centre whilst still holding some conservative values in terms of social justice (something you raise frequently) - this would also appeal to former red wall voters that switched because of Brexit stance.

To take seats in Scotland we need to appeal to those that vote SNP not Tory... and without Scotland I see no way back. Labour should shout loud about it’s left values, it’s not something to be embarrassed about and despite getting thumped they still got over 10m votes don’t their is appetite for it.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,621
Ian1779 said:
Labours issue now is that whilst they are trying to appeal to people that don’t vote for them - moderate Tories and centrists (on the face of it making some sense) they are now alienating the core base of their vote that stuck with them in 2019. No point in gaining moderates and centrists because you have an ‘electable’ face if you then lose the others. At the moment we just appear to be heading straight back to 2010-15 with no awareness of why the party was so shit then and no plan. Starmer was supposed to take the good aspects of the Corbyn era (and there was some) and build on them to become an electable force.... there needs to be something more radical economically to get the country back on its feet.
Click to expand...

Surely it depends on the difference. If you gain more centrists than you lose lefties it's worthwhile.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,622
chiefdave said:
A big issue here is not only they can't open but they haven't been given a date. A lot of theatres rely on pantos to get them through the year financially and they should be prepping for those now but still don't know if they'll be open so can't get tickets on sale.
Click to expand...

Even if they can open soon if the winter wave occurs they're fucked. If they have to shut again during their most profitable time of year they're going to struggle way more than now. Even with a restricted crowd they'll suffer. Used to playing to big crowds two times a day for a month or so and they end up with nothing. Massive financial hit compared to a dozen people watching Kafka in the summer for two or three nights.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,623
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Surely it depends on the difference. If you gain more centrists than you lose lefties it's worthwhile.
Click to expand...
Depends where they in terms of geographical location. I might be wrong, but I feel that centrists and lefties often occupy the same areas (London and big metropolitan conurbations) - and I’m unconvinced that northern constituencies are full of centrists.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,624
Ian1779 said:
Depends where they in terms of geographical location. I might be wrong, but I feel that centrists and lefties often occupy the same areas (London and big metropolitan conurbations) - and I’m unconvinced that northern constituencies are full of centrists.
Click to expand...

So if the leftists and centrists occupy the same areas therefore the righties must all be in the same area too and you think this is where a left-leaning party should focus its efforts? If the north would rather vote for a right wing party that has historically decimated their industries, livelihoods and communities rather than a left wing/centrist party then there's no hope.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,625
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
So if the leftists and centrists occupy the same areas therefore the righties must all be in the same area too and you think this is where a left-leaning party should focus its efforts? If the north would rather vote for a right wing party that has historically decimated their industries, livelihoods and communities rather than a left wing/centrist party then there's no hope.
Click to expand...

Northern Labour voters have been in decline since the end of the 90’s because the party was viewed as too London-centric. 2017 was actually an arrest of this decline and in some areas it started to improve, only to be truly fucked by the Brexit stance.

I know we have gone over this before but I don’t believe abandoning ‘left’ economic policy is going to make anywhere near enough electoral gains. Labour should be all about fairer distribution of economic wealth and it should be championing housing and green initiatives - be radical in this way. If it wants to appeal to the Tory voters then be more ‘British’ on social values. They should have learnt that in 2015 when we couldn’t be deciphered from the Tories.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,626
Ian1779 said:
Northern Labour voters have been in decline since the end of the 90’s because the party was viewed as too London-centric. 2017 was actually an arrest of this decline and in some areas it started to improve, only to be truly fucked by the Brexit stance.

I know we have gone over this before but I don’t believe abandoning ‘left’ economic policy is going to make anywhere near enough electoral gains. Labour should be all about fairer distribution of economic wealth and it should be championing housing and green initiatives - be radical in this way. If it wants to appeal to the Tory voters then be more ‘British’ on social values. They should have learnt that in 2015 when we couldn’t be deciphered from the Tories.
Click to expand...

Attacking the Tories from the right is a hopeless battle. Scotland I think is permanently lost because the demographic of voters who are both on the left and unionist is just too small to get more than a handful of seats (in some parts of Glasgow and Edinburgh but that's it). We need economically left and socially conservative messaging in both parts of the country I think.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer and Ian1779

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,627
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Attacking the Tories from the right is a hopeless battle. Scotland I think is permanently lost because the demographic of voters who are both on the left and unionist is just too small to get more than a handful of seats (in some parts of Glasgow and Edinburgh but that's it). We need economically left and socially conservative messaging in both parts of the country I think.
Click to expand...

I think best case scenario is we could get 10 seats in the places you’ve mentioned. We had 7 in 2017, now only have 1. The way the Tories have handled Cov-ID I think they’ll lose the little seats they have next time round.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,628
Ian1779 said:
I think best case scenario is we could get 10 seats in the places you’ve mentioned. We had 7 in 2017, now only have 1.
Click to expand...

I do wish that Ian Murray were given a bigger role in the shadow cabinet. He's always sounded level headed whenever I've heard him speak and I think he gets what's gone wrong better than most as the sole survivor of the 2015 election.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 9, 2020
  • #29,629
Ian1779 said:
Corbyn toxicity with voters stemmed from Brexit and the decision to pursue the PV (championed by Starmer no less) - it allowed the Tories to pin on him that he didn’t respect democracy. To their credit they executed that with aplomb, and once they had that embedded they could chuck anything and everything and it would stick. But the Tories are now rolling out their version of Socialism 2.0 and Labour aren’t even making a noise to say that these are things that sit front and centre of a Labour economic manifesto. Instead they’re too busy alienating BAME voters and members that are deserting the party. What next? The youth vote because we row back on affordable housing or green issues?

They are in danger of being outflanked on the left by the Lib Dems who have finally realised that their success under Kennedy in early 2000’s came from being in the left side of the centre whilst still holding some conservative values in terms of social justice (something you raise frequently) - this would also appeal to former red wall voters that switched because of Brexit stance.

To take seats in Scotland we need to appeal to those that vote SNP not Tory... and without Scotland I see no way back. Labour should shout loud about it’s left values, it’s not something to be embarrassed about and despite getting thumped they still got over 10m votes don’t their is appetite for it.
Click to expand...

Sorry I couldn’t disagree more. Corbyn was toxic for way more than just Brexit, he was especially toxic to Brexit voters but for non Brexit reasons (terrorism/patriotism mostly) as well as unappealing to remainers (brexit and racism and too left wing).

There’s no evidence of a wide scale BAME exodus over racism and if there was they aren’t going to vote Tory.

The Lib Dem’s do well when we do well, a sensible Labour allows the LDs to soak up soft Tories. They won’t go far left, they may go ultra Liberal, but that’s kinda the point of them. The Lib Dem’s aren’t going to win over Red Wall socially conservative voters as a socially liberal party.

Also Scotland isn’t that left wing and votes SNP because we aren’t a sensible force for government and because of independence. We can win without Scotland but need to make deep inroads into middle England to do it.

We can win if we chill on the culture war, build up the patriotism, and promise to build and create jobs. And look competent. And we can include tax hikes for the very rich (though I’d focus on companies) as well as investment in public services and green tech. We probably won’t see an NES or nationalising all the things, but that’s the price for power. The Tories don’t get all their wet dreams either.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,630
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,631
Sky Blue Pete said:
Click to expand...
How he’s not criminally responsible for this I have no idea
 
Reactions: derbyskyblue, skybluetony176 and lifeskyblue

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,632
Caroline Dinenage getting rinsed by BBC wet lettuce Charlie Stayt this morning. As is the norm now, totally unprepared to answer the most predictable of questions.
That will be another program added to the list of those they refuse to appear on because of the nasty man asking questions.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,633
Sky Blue Pete said:
How he’s not criminally responsible for this I have no idea
Click to expand...
He’s killed more British people than Blair did through the illegal war. By about 44,500 people to be precise. Well, I say precise when I mean by the governments own figures.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,634
Sky Blue Pete said:
Click to expand...

He said in that video he shakes hands with everyone

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,635
clint van damme said:
He said in that video he shakes hands with everyone

Click to expand...

Woah
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,636

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,637
stupot07 said:

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Just keeps on coming doesn’t it
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,638
clint van damme said:
Caroline Dinenage getting rinsed by BBC wet lettuce Charlie Stayt this morning. As is the norm now, totally unprepared to answer the most predictable of questions.
That will be another program added to the list of those they refuse to appear on because of the nasty man asking questions.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: clint van damme
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,639
skybluetony176 said:
He’s killed more British people than Blair did through the illegal war. By about 44,500 people to be precise. Well, I say precise when I mean by the governments own figures.
Click to expand...

You know if he faced an inquiry he’d just churn out the jokes and rambunctious clown routine and get away with it.
 
Last edited: Jul 10, 2020
W

Walsgrave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,640
skybluetony176 said:
Click to expand...
This is a consequence of the appalling teaching of science we have in British schools. British scientific standards are behind Germany, the Scandinavian countries, you name it. It is only because of foreign researchers that the British scientific head is above water. Rather than regarding scientific understanding as an essential part of public life, people would rather be contrarian and 'leave it to the scientists'.
 
D

derbyskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,641
shmmeee said:
Woah
Click to expand...
Thats the first time ive seen that, had to watch it twice to be sure.......
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,642
Walsgrave said:
This is a consequence of the appalling teaching of science we have in British schools. British scientific standards are behind Germany, the Scandinavian countries, you name it. It is only because of foreign researchers that the British scientific head is above water. Rather than regarding scientific understanding as an essential part of public life, people would rather be contrarian and 'leave it to the scientists'.
Click to expand...

No offence taken I only partook in both
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,643
Ian1779 said:
Northern Labour voters have been in decline since the end of the 90’s because the party was viewed as too London-centric. 2017 was actually an arrest of this decline and in some areas it started to improve, only to be truly fucked by the Brexit stance.

I know we have gone over this before but I don’t believe abandoning ‘left’ economic policy is going to make anywhere near enough electoral gains. Labour should be all about fairer distribution of economic wealth and it should be championing housing and green initiatives - be radical in this way. If it wants to appeal to the Tory voters then be more ‘British’ on social values. They should have learnt that in 2015 when we couldn’t be deciphered from the Tories.
Click to expand...

On the whole I agree with you, but to suggest Northern Labour voters feel they're too London-centric (which they may well do with the Islington socialists like Corbyn) but why then would they move to Tory, who're even more London centric, but focused on the wealthy bits like the City, Chelsea, Kensington etc and then the leafy commuter suburbs of Surrey and Kent.

Why do people keep on falling for the guff about Midlands Engine and Northern Powerhouse. I mean if you just look at those policies it's nothing more than playing to lazy stereotypes of the regions based on their golden periods. Manufacturing/factories etc when those days are gone. Never suggest those plans for the South do they? It's nothing more than lip service. Are people really that stupid that they'll just vote for something that helps them reminisce about the 'good old days'?
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,644
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
On the whole I agree with you, but to suggest Northern Labour voters feel they're too London-centric (which they may well do with the Islington socialists like Corbyn) but why then would they move to Tory, who're even more London centric, but focused on the wealthy bits like the City, Chelsea, Kensington etc and then the leafy commuter suburbs of Surrey and Kent.

Why do people keep on falling for the guff about Midlands Engine and Northern Powerhouse. I mean if you just look at those policies it's nothing more than playing to lazy stereotypes of the regions based on their golden periods. Manufacturing/factories etc when those days are gone. Never suggest those plans for the South do they? It's nothing more than lip service. Are people really that stupid that they'll just vote for something that helps them reminisce about the 'good old days'?
Click to expand...

I guess the ‘London Wanker’ or ‘Home Counties Prick’ doesn’t play so well.
 
W

Walsgrave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 10, 2020
  • #29,645
Brighton Sky Blue said:
No offence taken I only partook in both
Click to expand...
Haha!
I am mostly referring to the small but sizeable minority of schools where there is such a dearth of talent that there are Heads of Department who are trained in PE or other subjects. A school is considered lucky if it has a qualified teacher of Physics, for instance, else some joker from PE has to step in to deliver the lessons. With all due respect to the PE teacher, it saddens me that this is the norm for many schools, and it gives me little hope that this kind of attitude trickles its way up to the very top of government - rather than scientific understanding being promoted, it's made exclusive to a few individuals, thereby allowing people to delegate responsibility to 'the scientists'.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 845
  • 846
  • 847
  • 848
  • 849
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 847 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 33 (members: 0, guests: 33)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?