Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (110 Viewers)

  • Thread starter BackRoomRummermill
  • Start date Feb 23, 2020
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 56 of 1666 Next Last

cc84cov

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,926
Nick said:
It won't be easy when clubs are hammering the legal action. Look how much teams in the Championship will miss out on when not going up.
Click to expand...
Exactly no chance it will simply all be voided
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,927
Nick said:
It won't be easy when clubs are hammering the legal action. Look how much teams in the Championship will miss out on when not going up.
Click to expand...

And what about the teams who want to avoid going down or have nothing to play for and don’t want to risk their staff?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,928
djr8369 said:
And what about the teams who want to avoid going down or have nothing to play for and don’t want to risk their staff?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

They will be the ones shouting for it to be voided and forgotten about.
 
T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,929
The right decision.

We will come back for action refreshed and ready to finish the work in progress.

PUSB!
 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,930
Nick said:
They will be the ones shouting for it to be voided and forgotten about.
Click to expand...

Exactly. If it goes to a vote it’s going to be very tight and the teams with nothing to play for will ere on the side of the caution.

I doubt there will be any legal action. You wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if the decision has been made in the interest of public health and your gripe is losing out of profit. Plus, if the government shut down sporting events legislation will be introduced so you won’t be able to contest it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,931
Season will continue. Sod the calendar. So what if next season starts in Oct. So we cancel the league up and efl trophy next season. Or the fixtures are differently placed.

I said before there's 5 games played over 12 days at Xmas. Teams have 9 games to play. How on earth can anyone justify cancelling 7.5 months of play and how can that be seen as easiest option?
 
Reactions: SBQuin, Skyblueweeman, RegTheDonk and 3 others
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,932
Nick said:
It won't be easy when clubs are hammering the legal action. Look how much teams in the Championship will miss out on when not going up.
Click to expand...

But it works both ways.

If it's kept as it is then there will be plenty of teams launching legal action to say we were denied the chance promotion/avoiding relegation.
 
Reactions: djr8369
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,933
larry_david said:
Season will continue. Sod the calendar. So what if next season starts in Oct. So we cancel the league up and efl trophy next season. Or the fixtures are differently placed.

I said before there's 5 games played over 12 days at Xmas. Teams have 9 games to play. How on earth can anyone justify cancelling 7.5 months of play and how can that be seen as easiest option?
Click to expand...

It depends what the choice of options are. If this is going to continue for months, as the government stated last night, you’re not going to fit the games in. It’s then a choice of rolling into next season which opens a can of worms. So you’re left with ending the season as it is now, estimating points from the remaining games or voiding. IF it comes to those being the options voiding is a possibility.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,934
SkyBlueDom26 said:
'I've had worse flu - without a doubt': British man who caught the coronavirus | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...

Indeed, and for the vast majority that’s what it will probably be like.

However, if this is an attempt to suggest it’s not serious, then there’s an abject failure to understand the simple, basic arithmetic of the issue.

In very straightforward terms, even if it’s a minor illness for 99% and only 1% develop symptoms that need hospitalisation, then given the likely size of the infected population it’s still going to swamp the NHS.

That’s why it’s important to treat it seriously now, and try to slow down the spread as much as possible whilst improving the structures that can deal with it.

That isn’t panic or hyperbole, that’s simple cold logic that saves lives. It won’t be like a mild cold for everyone.
 
Reactions: LastGarrison, Paxman II, clint van damme and 5 others
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,935
duffer said:
Indeed, and for the vast majority that’s what it will probably be like.

However, if this is an attempt to suggest it’s not serious, then there’s an abject failure to understand the simple, basic arithmetic of the issue.

In very straightforward terms, even if it’s a minor illness for 99% and only 1% develop symptoms that need hospitalisation, then given the likely size of the infected population it’s still going to swamp the NHS.

That’s why it’s important to treat it seriously now, and try to slow down the spread as much as possible whilst improving the structures that can deal with it.

That isn’t panic or hyperbole, that’s simple cold logic that saves lives. It won’t be like a mild cold for everyone.
Click to expand...

Yep.

It's amazing how many people don't seem to get this.

Actually it's not amazing, it's quite frightening.
 
Reactions: Brylowes, duffer and djr8369

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,936
djr8369 said:
There are three PL teams self isolating. Do you think the decision to delay games is due to hysteria?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Most certainly - the Chelsea guy who has it is laughing on a Video link that he had to stay at home - do you honestly think not a single player had swine flu in the UK in 2009?
 
Reactions: Paxman II

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,937
PVA said:
Yep.

It's amazing how many people don't seem to get this.

Actually it's not amazing, it's quite frightening.
Click to expand...

Whats amazing is you are actually suggesting blocking NHS beds and cannot see why
 

cooperskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,938
They need to finish the season, however long that takes, next season is precisely that NEXT season, it doesn't need to start at a specific time, it can start when it can do. Yes I'm biased like the rest of us, and will be devastated and gutted if this brilliant season gets voided.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, AStonesThrow and CCFCSteve

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,939
duffer said:
Indeed, and for the vast majority that’s what it will probably be like.

However, if this is an attempt to suggest it’s not serious, then there’s an abject failure to understand the simple, basic arithmetic of the issue.

In very straightforward terms, even if it’s a minor illness for 99% and only 1% develop symptoms that need hospitalisation, then given the likely size of the infected population it’s still going to swamp the NHS.

That’s why it’s important to treat it seriously now, and try to slow down the spread as much as possible whilst improving the structures that can deal with it.

That isn’t panic or hyperbole, that’s simple cold logic that saves lives. It won’t be like a mild cold for everyone.
Click to expand...

Chris Smith is a senior virologist and says exactly the opposite to you and that a staggering of infections is essential management and that it is impossible to slow down a spread as eventually 100% WILL contract the virus
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,940
Grendel said:
Whats amazing is you are actually suggesting blocking NHS beds and cannot see why
Click to expand...

I suggested nothing of the sort. Please point out where I did.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,941
Grendel said:
Chris Smith is a senior virologist and says exactly the opposite to you and that a staggering of infections is essential management and that it is impossible to slow down a spread as eventually 100% WILL contract the virus
Click to expand...
Yeah to have most the infections now when the NHS is still dealing with the regular glue season is madness

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,942
PVA said:
I suggested nothing of the sort. Please point out where I did.
Click to expand...

You are going against a senior virologists expert view that all mass gatherings should continue until a peak is reached as if you do not you will create a huge spike in elderly and vulnerable cases rather than stagger them
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,943
Grendel said:
You are going against a senior virologists expert view that all mass gatherings should continue until a peak is reached as if you do not you will create a huge spike in elderly and vulnerable cases rather than stagger them
Click to expand...

You need to take actions and put measures in place to flatten the curve. By doing nothing, as we basically are, we are doing nothing to flatten the curve.


How canceled events and self-quarantines save lives, in one chart



 
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,944
Grendel said:
Most certainly - the Chelsea guy who has it is laughing on a Video link that he had to stay at home - do you honestly think not a single player had swine flu in the UK in 2009?
Click to expand...

You seem to miss the point. The teams have self quarantined so the fixtures cannot be fulfilled. Whether a player laughed or swine flu went unnoticed is irrelevant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Brylowes and PVA

Nick

Administrator
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,945
How many people are at Cheltenham today crammed into Gazebos?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,946
djr8369 said:
You seem to miss the point. The teams have self quarantined so the fixtures cannot be fulfilled. Whether a player laughed or swine flu went unnoticed is irrelevant.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Well it is - are you a virologist? He disagrees with this - why do you?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,947
PVA said:
You need to take actions and put measures in place to flatten the curve. By doing nothing, as we basically are, we are doing nothing to flatten the curve.


How canceled events and self-quarantines save lives, in one chart



Click to expand...

Do you have more knowledge that the senior virologist Chris Smith - yes or no?
You do realise this is why he is suggesting this don't you - this proves what in your interpretation?
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,948
Grendel said:
Chris Smith is a senior virologist and says exactly the opposite to you and that a staggering of infections is essential management and that it is impossible to slow down a spread as eventually 100% WILL contract the virus
Click to expand...

Except that other senior virologists in Europe and elsewhere seem to disagree with how that approach is being managed. The UK, or more technically England and Wales is pretty much the only place in Europe that isn’t taking more stringent measures to try to slow the spread.

Even previous government health specialists have come out against the current relaxed approach, what’s your level of expertise to discount all of their theories?

I hope it’s better than your statement that you can’t slow the spread down because that’s patently not supported by the evidence.
 
Reactions: PVA

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,949
Grendel said:
You are going against a senior virologists expert view that all mass gatherings should continue until a peak is reached as if you do not you will create a huge spike in elderly and vulnerable cases rather than stagger them
Click to expand...

That is not their view. Their view is it needs doing to flatten the curve, the behavioural psychologists view is that if we do it too soon people will get bored and stop listening. It’s not an epidemiological argument, it’s a psychological one.
 
Reactions: djr8369, Ring Of Steel and PVA

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,950
duffer said:
Except that other senior virologists in Europe and elsewhere seem to disagree with how that approach is being managed. The UK, or more technically England and Wales is pretty much the only place in Europe that isn’t taking more stringent measures to try to slow the spread.

Even previous government health specialists have come out against the current relaxed approach, what’s your level of expertise to discount all of their theories?

I hope it’s better than your statement that you can’t slow the spread down because that’s patently not supported by the evidence.
Click to expand...
What's your level of expertise to discount the theories of the medical experts at phe

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 
P

PVA

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,951
Grendel said:
Do you have more knowledge that the senior virologist Chris Smith - yes or no?
You do realise this is why he is suggesting this don't you - this
Click to expand...

No I don't.

Do you have more knowledge than the senior virologists across the world who are advocating putting in measures in place?

No you don't.

We are pretty much the only country without any significant measures in place. You say that we need to flatten the curve... yet advocate doing nothing to flatten the curve.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,952
David O'Day said:
Yeah to have most the infections now when the NHS is still dealing with the regular glue season is madness

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
If that happened the nhs would be in a sticky situation.
 
Reactions: BornSlippySkyBlue

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,953
Skyblueweeman said:
Interestingly, I've just spoken to someone who is a relation of a board member at a fellow L1 club. Apparently this suspension was agreed last week but only announced today.

Also, 3 Championship clubs, are apparently in grave danger of not making it to the end of the season now due to lack of cash flow. This could actually create one or more 'Burys' by the time the season finishes.

Worrying times.
Click to expand...
By the time this is over many businesses and jobs will have gone to the wall,
there is bound to be a number of football clubs not healthy enough to survive it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,954
shmmeee said:
That is not their view. Their view is it needs doing to flatten the curve, the behavioural psychologists view is that if we do it too soon people will get bored and stop listening. It’s not an epidemiological argument, it’s a psychological one.
Click to expand...

The peak is flattened by not taking action - that is the point so through natural infection it manages the capacity unlike in Italy when they rapidly became overloaded
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,955
duffer said:
Except that other senior virologists in Europe and elsewhere seem to disagree with how that approach is being managed. The UK, or more technically England and Wales is pretty much the only place in Europe that isn’t taking more stringent measures to try to slow the spread.

Even previous government health specialists have come out against the current relaxed approach, what’s your level of expertise to discount all of their theories?

I hope it’s better than your statement that you can’t slow the spread down because that’s patently not supported by the evidence.
Click to expand...

Which government health specialists?
 

BornSlippySkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,956
I see Jeremy Hunt thinks we aren’t taking drastic enough measures, which gives me renewed optimism that, in fact — we are!
 
Reactions: MalcSB, Sky Blue Pete, Marty and 1 other person

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,957
BornSlippySkyBlue said:
I see Jeremy Hunt thinks we aren’t taking drastic enough measures, which gives me renewed optimism that, in fact — we are!
Click to expand...

I assume he is the health "specilaist"
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,958
PVA said:
No I don't.

Do you have more knowledge than the senior virologists across the world who are advocating putting in measures in place?

No you don't.

We are pretty much the only country without any significant measures in place. You say that we need to flatten the curve... yet advocate doing nothing to flatten the curve.
Click to expand...
As the deputy cmo said thst in the greatest of the respects to them they don't have access to uk data.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete
D

djr8369

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,959
Just a few points for the several posters falling over themselves to try and sound smart by repeating what the government experts said last night or saying the whole thing is hyperbole.

Most of us saw the press conference last night and understand what the plan is so please stop condescendingly explaining it to everyone on the thread.


Look at the bigger picture. No country is following the strategy we are. Our strategy is unorthodox and high risk. They’re all listening to their own experts who are coming to different conclusions. Our plan may prove to be the best course of action in the long term, only time will tell, but even if that’s the case things aren’t that straight forward.

Firstly, the day after the government announced the new phase they’re already losing control as organisations are shutting things down anyway. You might consider that “hyperbole” but almost every other affected country is doing similar things, sports seasons cancelled etc. The league can’t function with teams having to go into self isolation. Delay fixtures for two weeks and you’ll just have other teams in isolation.

Secondly, there is going to be huge political pressure on this strategy. Journalists were already asking awkward questions last night. What do you think the public reaction will be when pensioners are dropping by the hundreds and the government are saying “herd immunity”?

The strategy might have been “war gamed” by a nerd with a PPE degree playing at being a tech entrepreneur but that doesn’t mean it’s going to survive contact with reality.

I actually think the broad idea is smart but it’s going to take balls of steel and the public reaction to it is going to be intense as people start dying in higher numbers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: fernandopartridge, montydon87 and PVA

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 13, 2020
  • #1,960
djr8369 said:
Just a few points for the several posters falling over themselves to try and sound smart by repeating what the government experts said last night or saying the whole thing is hyperbole.

Most of us saw the press conference last night and understand what the plan is so please stop condescendingly explaining it to everyone on the thread.


Look at the bigger picture. No country is following the strategy we are. Our strategy is unorthodox and high risk. They’re all listening to their own experts who are coming to different conclusions. Our plan may prove to be the best course of action in the long term, only time will tell, but even if that’s the case things aren’t that straight forward.

Firstly, the day after the government announced the new phase they’re already losing control as organisations are shutting things down anyway. You might consider that “hyperbole” but almost every other affected country is doing similar things, sports seasons cancelled etc. The league can’t function with teams having to go into self isolation. Delay fixtures for two weeks and you’ll just have other teams in isolation.

Secondly, there is going to be huge political pressure on this strategy. Journalists were already asking awkward questions last night. What do you think the public reaction will be when pensioners are dropping by the hundreds and the government are saying “herd immunity”?

The strategy might have been “war gamed” by a nerd with a PPE degree playing at being a tech entrepreneur but that doesn’t mean it’s going to survive contact with reality.

I actually think the broad idea is smart but it’s going to take balls of steel and the public reaction to it is going to be intense as people start dying in higher numbers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

You think we will have a higher death rate than Italy? Wow
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • …
  • 1666
Next
First Prev 56 of 1666 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 107 (members: 0, guests: 107)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?