Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Clubs chasing Lukas Jutkiewicz (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter CovScott88
  • Start date Jun 21, 2011
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #1
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11688_6998879,00.html

Hell no!!!
 

Coventry La La La

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #2
Just read this myself and was just about to put the thread up! Please stay Jutkiewicz!
 
W

wexfordskyblue

Facebook User
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #3
Not a chance of Lukas going.
 
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #4
This would not be good at all. Lukas is our only quality striker and would really be missed if he were to move on. Hopefully the club will be able to withstand any bids, but given our current situation, I wouldn't bet my life on it! The big thing could be that he was born and raised in Southampton, who I believe he supports, so that could be a big pull for him. You couldn't really blame him for wanting to be closer to his home and family.

Stay with us for at least a couple more years though Juke, you know it makes sense.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #5
Oh ffs! As a City fan it never rains, only pours
 

ScottShearerFanClub

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #6
Sisu would look at him as profit not a great player. you never know..
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #7
Tbf it lists Bristol, Millwall and Southampton. If we can't compete with holding onto a contracted player from those, then we might as well give up.
 

Jimthor

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #8
CCFC T said:
Sisu would look at him as profit not a great player. you never know..
Click to expand...

SISU don't make the decisions like this, the board do. SISU only have 1 representative on the board.
 

Sky_Blue_Daz

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #9
Give him a 4 year deal now
 
J

JCR1987

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #10
Surely we'd have to make a million+ for it to be worth our while letting him go and, whilst I like him, I don't think he's the finished article and I can't see championship clubs forking out 1.5 - 2 million for a somewhat unproven striker.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #11
Got £2m for Best and Lukas shows more potential imo not to mention work-rate and attitude. I'm sure if L2 strikers are quoted at £1m then it would take £3m to see him go.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #12
Firstly I think selling Jutkiewicz would be a big mistake both in a valuable player being lost but also in what it says to the fans about the direction we are heading. Think this is just a bit of baseless journalism but you never know ..... because part of the survival strategy is based on player sales by CCFC

With the greatest respect JimThor i do wish people would stop thinking there is a dividing line between SISU and what the board do. They have a member on the Board for a reason, to make sure they have input in all decisions, but above that the Board are appointed by SISU so you can expect a close rather than distant relationship. More importantly SISU controls the money, if they decide their Board need to sell players for the club to survive then the Board will sell players - control of the finances is the power at CCFC and SISU controls that. Chelsea has a Board of Directors but we all know who controls the club. Just to be clear that is not a criticism of SISU.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #13
I dont think we did get £2m for Best. Think in the year to 31st May 2010 we only sold Dann Fox and Best and for a total amount of £5.77m (net of agents costs etc). (figs from the accounts). Reckon it was net of costs Dann £3m Fox £2m and Best £0.77m but cant be sure of the split Rob

But totally agree with your comments about Jutkiewicz
 
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #14
We wouldn't really be surprised if Juke was sold and then free transfers brought in to replace him though would we. That's the reality of being a City fan I suppose.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #15
to be honest there is very little at CCFC that surprises me but plenty that has over the years disappointed. I think given our finances the Club has to consider any good offer for any of our players. I wont be happy if he goes though
 

Sky Blue Luke

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #16
Apparently he's a Saints fan too, if the rumours are true that Southampton are interested I could see him leaving.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #17
Not sure on this but arent there still some instalments on his transfer to pay Everton? If so perhaps that would also increase the pressure to sell him ?
 

mattylad

Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #18
After Thorn came out and said what a big season he thinks the bloke will have it would be a slap in his face were he sold....this is probably just an agent trying to hawk him around, perhaps Juke is not happy they did not resign King?
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #19
I hope there is nothing in this rumour. If he was to go, which i cant see unless we get a reaply over the odds offer that we cant turn down, we will be down to Eastwood, O'Donovan, Platt and Jeffers. Now that doesnt give me much confidence. AT has his budget and i cant seein ajy sales increasing that budget so we'pl be screwed if we sell up. Heres hoping its onpy a rumour and stays that way!
 

TheRoyalScam

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #20
oldskyblue58 said:
Firstly I think selling Jutkiewicz would be a big mistake both in a valuable player being lost but also in what it says to the fans about the direction we are heading. Think this is just a bit of baseless journalism but you never know ..... because part of the survival strategy is based on player sales by CCFC

With the greatest respect JimThor i do wish people would stop thinking there is a dividing line between SISU and what the board do. They have a member on the Board for a reason, to make sure they have input in all decisions, but above that the Board are appointed by SISU so you can expect a close rather than distant relationship. More importantly SISU controls the money, if they decide their Board need to sell players for the club to survive then the Board will sell players - control of the finances is the power at CCFC and SISU controls that. Chelsea has a Board of Directors but we all know who controls the club. Just to be clear that is not a criticism of SISU.
Click to expand...

^^^^^^^^^
What he said!

Put simply - SISU own the club and are the only shareholders now that RR and GH have resigned. Their 'representative' on the board [Onye] will be able to steamroller any decision - that's how we sold Fox, Dann, Best and tried to offload Conor Thomas - SISU exists for and serves its investors, not CCFC, so if a £2.5m bid comes in for Juke they will be obliged to consider it.
 
P

procdoc

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #21
it would ne nice to read some positive transfer news for a change
 

Glenn Storer

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #22
This would be an absolute disaster, I can't really see it happening but then again this is CCFC so nothing is certain. Growing rumours about Clingan to Ipswich as well, but if that happens I'll eat my shoes.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #23
I can see it happening. I would jump at the chance to play for my home team and they would probably offer a better wage then we could at the minute.
 
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #24
There's no doubt that the lure of playing for your home town club could be very appealing to him. Especially as he will be closer to his friends and family.
I certainly wouldn't begrudge him the move, though obviously I want him to stay!
 

dojer

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #25
Really hope this is not true, the only point that would point against this being the case is the article links Juke to Bristol City who already have Stead, Maynard, Clarkson, Taylor and Brett Pitman, surely they can't be after yet another striker, so maybe the journalist is being lazy with the report. I see the Clingan to Ipswich having more potential as I believe he's in the final year of his contract so the board would prefer to get a fee over nothing for him
 
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #26
dojer said:
Really hope this is not true, the only point that would point against this being the case is the article links Juke to Bristol City who already have Stead, Maynard, Clarkson, Taylor and Brett Pitman, surely they can't be after yet another striker, so maybe the journalist is being lazy with the report. I see the Clingan to Ipswich having more potential as I believe he's in the final year of his contract so the board would prefer to get a fee over nothing for him
Click to expand...

There is quite a high chance that Nicky Maynard could leave though. Plus I remember reading that a Prem team were after Brett Pitman aswell.
Add that to the fact Stead is poor and who knows!
 
H

Hcut PUSB

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #27
CovScott88 said:
There is quite a high chance that Nicky Maynard could leave though. Plus I remember reading that a Prem team were after Brett Pitman aswell.
Add that to the fact Stead is poor and who knows!
Click to expand...

I agree very high chanMaynard will def go, if Pitman is on for a move as well they would be in the hunt for a striker, Stead seemed ok early doors for them last season but it didnt carry on for long, as we know from his spell with us he isnt a 25 a year man.
 
S

smileycov

Facebook User
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #28
would take juke/lambert swap though!!
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #29
CCFC - Club took a chance on him, settled in the area ?. guaranteed a starting place

Southampton - Home town club, more money, more chance of promotion to PL


hmmm
 

Ernie Machin

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #30
Just another rumour.

Though if Southampton really are interested, then we have a big problem. Just when you think our forward line couldn't get any weaker.
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #31
Southampton. Stay away from our Jukebox
 
C

CovScott88

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #32
Ernie Machin said:
Just another rumour.

Though if Southampton really are interested, then we have a big problem. Just when you think our forward line couldn't get any weaker.
Click to expand...

What are you worried about Ernie? You must be forgetting that we have 3 other prolific strikers - Freddy Eastwood, Clive Platt and Roy O'Donovan.
Everything will be fine.............haha! :facepalm:
 

CovLis86

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #33
This would just be a massive disaster if true. I think that would be the final nail for a lot of fans, and i could see the protests coming around the corner.
 

Ernie Machin

New Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #34
Grim eh? We'd be better off with Clint Eastwood, Gail Platt and Jason Donovan.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 21, 2011
  • #35
nooooooooo
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?