Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Championship Goals Record (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter DT-R
  • Start date Oct 5, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Robinshio

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:34 PM
  • #36
DT-R said:
A little later than promised, but on to the round of 24. See out December. Get to Xmas and see how we're looking.

As i mentioned before, I started as a goals thread as we were/are scoring for fun so thought id compare goals records. However, i think we're now (possibly) in the realms of comparing points record teams too. Obviously Fulham in 2021/22 finished on 106 points (even after losing to us twice that season) and im adding Readings 2005/08 108 point record season.

Anyway, on the the stats:

Bolton: 43pts, 48:34. 2nd

Fulham: 48pts, 57:21. 1st

Man City: 45pts, 55:34. 2nd

Leeds: 51pts, 44:15. 1st

Burnley: 48pts, 30:9. 3rd

Reading: 59pts, 48:12. 1st.

So a best points of 59pts meaning we would need 16 points from a possible 18. 5 wins and 1 draw. Not so likely I'd have to say.
An average points total of 58.8. So the same for average points too!

Adding Reading in really makes that difference.

If we take Reading out, we have a highest points tally of 51 from last seasons Leeds. That would be 8 points from a possible 18. 2wins, 2 draws, 2 losses. Or 3 wins and 3 losses would return us a better haul of 9pts.
The average is also then 47. Meaning we'd only need 1 win and 1 draw to remain in touch with the pack.

In terms of goals scored, Man City are the highest scorers with 55.
So another 5 goals to keep up, 6 to better them. 1 goal per game.

In terms of goals, I dont have much worries. Id be surprisednif we couldnt score 6+ in 6 games. Also average points i think we'll be fine. But to keep pace with Reading and pick up 16 points, especially with the teams we've got ahead of us this month, might be a stretch. However, if we're closer to Reading than we are Man City's or Burnleys points by the end of this round, then they might aswell start etching our name on that trophy and getting the sky blue ribbon tied to the handles.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
not sure how you are working an average of 58.8 for points with only Reading 0.2 above that and all the others well below - maybe 49 (you divided by 5 instead of 6)
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:40 PM
  • #37
DT-R said:
A little later than promised, but on to the round of 24. See out December. Get to Xmas and see how we're looking.

As i mentioned before, I started as a goals thread as we were/are scoring for fun so thought id compare goals records. However, i think we're now (possibly) in the realms of comparing points record teams too. Obviously Fulham in 2021/22 finished on 106 points (even after losing to us twice that season) and im adding Readings 2005/08 108 point record season.

Anyway, on the the stats:

Bolton: 43pts, 48:34. 2nd

Fulham: 48pts, 57:21. 1st

Man City: 45pts, 55:34. 2nd

Leeds: 51pts, 44:15. 1st

Burnley: 48pts, 30:9. 3rd

Reading: 59pts, 48:12. 1st.

So a best points of 59pts meaning we would need 16 points from a possible 18. 5 wins and 1 draw. Not so likely I'd have to say.
An average points total of 58.8. So the same for average points too!

Adding Reading in really makes that difference.

If we take Reading out, we have a highest points tally of 51 from last seasons Leeds. That would be 8 points from a possible 18. 2wins, 2 draws, 2 losses. Or 3 wins and 3 losses would return us a better haul of 9pts.
The average is also then 47. Meaning we'd only need 1 win and 1 draw to remain in touch with the pack.

In terms of goals scored, Man City are the highest scorers with 55.
So another 5 goals to keep up, 6 to better them. 1 goal per game.

In terms of goals, I dont have much worries. Id be surprisednif we couldnt score 6+ in 6 games. Also average points i think we'll be fine. But to keep pace with Reading and pick up 16 points, especially with the teams we've got ahead of us this month, might be a stretch. However, if we're closer to Reading than we are Man City's or Burnleys points by the end of this round, then they might aswell start etching our name on that trophy and getting the sky blue ribbon tied to the handles.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Reading got 106 points. That’s the record. Fulham got 90 points in 21/22.
 

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:52 PM
  • #38
Robinshio said:
not sure how you are working an average of 58.8 for points with only Reading 0.2 above that and all the others well below - maybe 49 (you divided by 5 instead of 6)
Click to expand...
I have! Well spotted. Ive done the whole thing dividing by 5 teams, not thinking about the fact ive added a 6th!!! Ffs! Someone else take over please
its been a long week

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:53 PM
  • #39
DT-R said:
I have! Well spotted. Ive done the whole thing dividing by 5 teams, not thinking about the fact ive added a 6th!!! Ffs! Someone else take over please
its been a long week

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Ill fix it now!

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 12:58 PM
  • #40
A little later than promised, but on to the round of 24. See out December. Get to Xmas and see how we're looking.

As i mentioned before, I started as a goals thread as we were/are scoring for fun so thought id compare goals records. However, i think we're now (possibly) in the realms of comparing points record teams too. Obviously Fulham in 2021/22 finished on 106 points (even after losing to us twice that season) and im adding Readings 2005/08 108 point record season.

Anyway, on the the stats:

Bolton: 43pts, 48:34. 2nd

Fulham: 48pts, 57:21. 1st

Man City: 45pts, 55:34. 2nd

Leeds: 51pts, 44:15. 1st

Burnley: 48pts, 30:9. 3rd

Reading: 59pts, 48:12. 1st.

So a best points of 59pts meaning we would need 16 points from a possible 18. 5 wins and 1 draw. Not so likely I'd have to say.
An average points total of 49. So that would mean 6 points from 18. 2 wins, 4 losses losses. Not a great outcome and id fully expect better. Id certainly take a draw on Saturday. *edit, well spotted @Robinshio

Adding Reading in really makes that difference.

If we take Reading out, we have a highest points tally of 51 from last seasons Leeds. That would be 8 points from a possible 18. 2wins, 2 draws, 2 losses. Or 3 wins and 3 losses would return us a better haul of 9pts.
The average is also then 47. Meaning we'd only need 1 win and 1 draw to remain in touch with the pack.

In terms of goals scored, Man City are the highest scorers with 55.
So another 5 goals to keep up, 6 to better them. 1 goal per game.

In terms of goals, I dont have much worries. Id be surprisednif we couldnt score 6+ in 6 games. Also average points i think we'll be fine. But to keep pace with Reading and pick up 16 points, especially with the teams we've got ahead of us this month, might be a stretch. However, if we're closer to Reading than we are Man City's or Burnleys points by the end of this round, then they might aswell start etching our name on that trophy and getting the sky blue ribbon tied to the handles.

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk


Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Last edited: Yesterday at 1:06 PM

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:20 PM
  • #41
SkyBluePower said:
I think calling Man City “City” if you are a fan of them is entirely correct - it’s always been City or United up there.

Calling them the Sky Blues can fuck right off though. They ain’t having that.
Click to expand...

They’re the Citizens they made their choice and they can live with it.
 

bigfatronssba

Well-Known Member
  • Yesterday at 1:28 PM
  • #42
Torquay Sky Blue said:
My mates a Man City fan and he refers to them as City or the Sky Blues because he knows it annoys the fuck out of me. I'm triggered just thinking about it.
Click to expand...

I can understand calling them city.

But why would he call them the sky blues when that isn’t their nickname? He’s just being disrespectful to his own team, not us
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?