I don't even know what this means.
But while I disagree with Grendel on certain things he's certainly not responsible for a never rending stream of negativity like Saddlebrains.
As I said in an earlier post, look at his contribution to the recruitment's been shite thread and what he's posted about Simms and Wright.
He's not the only one but whenever there's threads of those sorts he's always involved and is every season.
He's quite entitled to post what he wants, but I'm entitled to respond as well
Can't see him giving anything less than 100% at Wembley, or when called upon in the league.The thing is, O’Hare seems to have lost some shine. He’s no longer the person to watch in the team.
Wouldnt call it a never ending stream tbh. I do post positivity
Sometimes
What????? Can't believe you actually just posted that. Come on man.I don't even know what this means.
But while I disagree with Grendel on certain things he's certainly not responsible for a never rending stream of negativity like Saddlebrains.
As I said in an earlier post, look at his contribution to the recruitment's been shite thread and what he's posted about Simms and Wright.
He's not the only one but whenever there's threads of those sorts he's always involved and is every season.
He's quite entitled to post what he wants, but I'm entitled to respond as well
What????? Can't believe you actually just posted that. Come on man.
Saddlebrains is negative at times and almost as if he has axe to grind sometimes but he's nowhere near as constantly negative as Grendel. Think it's weird you object to one and not the other that's all.
And that's not cuntish? Calling Palmer lazy constantly. Nearly man. Laughing at him and da Silva constantly. When they have good game, trying to deflect etcI find Saddlebrains one of the most negative posters on here. That's my opinion, you're entitled to yours.
And I dont object to either of them, they post their opinions and I respond when I feel like it.
For me Grendel calls a player poor and where theres obvious improvement he doubles down and digs his heels in.
And that's not cuntish? Calling Palmer lazy constantly. Nearly man. Laughing at him and da Silva constantly. Ehenh AVE good game trying to deflect etc
That's not cuntish?
Starting a thread about o hare is though?
Hmmm
I have said my point already. It's weird you pull up saddle brains on his cuntish behaviour but not Grendel.I've defended Palmer, never got the lazy thing.
I defended O'Hare.
I've defended Wright and Simms.
What's your point?
It could be the managers seen a slight drop off in performance with him so is nursing his long lay off instead of flogging the lad to deathWhether the situation has contributed to his perceived poor form, or the manager is deciding to concentrate and invest in players who will be here next season who knows.
Suppose it could be as simple as sticking to a winning formula, as Robins has previous for sticking with a winning team even if it's not always been the right call.
Let's hope O'Hare has his head straight as I have no doubt if the season is to end in success we will need a vital contribution from him at some point.
I have said my point already. It's weird you pull up saddle brains on his cuntish behaviour but not Grendel.
It's fucking crazy that's what it is. And not true.It's not weird, I've explained it, I think Saddlebrains is one of the most, if not the most negative poster on here.
I don't think Grendel is anywhere near as negative.
It's not difficult to understand even if you disagree.
It's fucking crazy that's what it is. And not true.
He does say some stupid shit. No issues with that. But he's nowhere near as negative as Grendel. It's wrong to brand him as that.Don't be silly, it's an opinion.
Saddlebrains goes doom and gloom at the first sign of adversity even very early in the season.
I think he's even admitted he overeacts. Again, he's totally entitled to do so even if I find it fucking annoying.
If you happy for Grendel to post on this forum you really have no right to go for saddlebrains???
It's not weird, I've explained it, I think Saddlebrains is one of the most, if not the most negative poster on here.
I don't think Grendel is anywhere near as negative.
It's not difficult to understand even if you disagree.
Genuinely not sure whether I’d start OHare or Torp alongside Sheaf and Eccles at Wembley.
He's new FFS. Give him timeCant figure Torp out. Started well, seems to have dipped slightly but as hes only coming off the bench and only been here 2 months i wont judge as thats bitten me on the arse
Hopefully the games left will help him adjust to the rigours of this league, and im expecting a lot from him next season
He’s just hormonalI raise you @Matt smith
He's new FFS. Give him time
Needs to gelCant figure Torp out. Started well, seems to have dipped slightly but as hes only coming off the bench and only been here 2 months i wont judge as thats bitten me on the arse
Hopefully the games left will help him adjust to the rigours of this league, and im expecting a lot from him next season
Needs to gel
O'Hare. Got to think that's he's the man who could almost single-handedly win the game for us.Genuinely not sure whether I’d start OHare or Torp alongside Sheaf and Eccles at Wembley.
I imagine the intensity of the games is much higher than he's used to so it's hard for him at the moment to maintain the level from when he first joined.Cant figure Torp out. Started well, seems to have dipped slightly but as hes only coming off the bench and only been here 2 months i wont judge as thats bitten me on the arse
Hopefully the games left will help him adjust to the rigours of this league, and im expecting a lot from him next season
Well that's as ridiculous as your views on Josh Eccles.controversial and unpopular opinion, but other than a decent spell shortly after coming back from his cruciate injury, COH as a player wasn’t anything special - he won a lot of free kicks but until recently that was about it, he weighed in with a few assists, and now he’s added a few goals over a few matches, but he’s definitely not irreplaceable and KP is definitely the player in form in that position….
The thing with O’Hare more than anything is his character and the way he gels the team, like a Paul Merson or Jimmy Bullard, and every successful team needs a few players like that
Well that's as ridiculous as your views on Josh Eccles.
Yeah tracking back to make tackles in the box?2019 / 20 (league one) - 29 games, 3 goals and 3 assists
2020 / 21 - 46 games, 3 goals 8 assists
2021/22 - 45 games, 5 goals 8 assists
2022/23 - 11 games, 0 goals 3 assists
2023/24 - 24 games, 6 goals, 3 assists
TOTAL - 126 games, 13 goals, 22 assists
35 goal involvements over 126 games, roughly one in four, for an attacking midfielder average at best and hardly pulling up trees is it? or am I missing something?
Chances created?2019 / 20 (league one) - 29 games, 3 goals and 3 assists
2020 / 21 - 46 games, 3 goals 8 assists
2021/22 - 45 games, 5 goals 8 assists
2022/23 - 11 games, 0 goals 3 assists
2023/24 - 24 games, 6 goals, 3 assists
TOTAL - 126 games, 13 goals, 22 assists
35 goal involvements over 126 games, roughly one in four, for an attacking midfielder average at best and hardly pulling up trees is it? or am I missing something?
I watched Utd against Brentford and Brentford should have battered them the amount of chances they missed. Utd are dodgy at the back and their midfield is not particularly interested in tracking back. We will get space and with O’Hare in the team we will get chances.O'Hare. Got to think that's he's the man who could almost single-handedly win the game for us.
This could be the perfect game for him you would think.
Absolutely G. That move against Wolves, instrumental in setting up the third!It’s disgraceful- the thread is just bollocks
He’s been one of our best players over the past four years - anyone who watches us can see that.2019 / 20 (league one) - 29 games, 3 goals and 3 assists
2020 / 21 - 46 games, 3 goals 8 assists
2021/22 - 45 games, 5 goals 8 assists
2022/23 - 11 games, 0 goals 3 assists
2023/24 - 24 games, 6 goals, 3 assists
TOTAL - 126 games, 13 goals, 22 assists
35 goal involvements over 126 games, roughly one in four, for an attacking midfielder average at best and hardly pulling up trees is it? or am I missing something?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?