Cheshire Sky Blue
New Member
I am sure that many of you have seen this already. http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-telegraph-letters-october-31-6259511
I am slowly but surely becoming less than convinced of Mr Byng’s involvement in this saga.
Could anyone explain why all of a sudden he has become SISU’s guardian angel. From my perspective, all that he has added to the debate is an additional layer of smoke, in an increasingly smokey situation. After the very clear and unambiguous statement from Ann Lucas he feels it appropriate to say this. (From the CT letters today)
‘Ultimately, any owner of the football club will, to be financially viable, have to build its own stadium in the city.
There is a crying need for leadership and statesmanship. Joy Seppala offers hope of a settlement to the city council. In turn senior members of the city council must also be prepared to break the deadlock with a telephone call to Ms Seppala'
According to latest reports Ms Seppala has now acceded to the request to emerge from her bunker and talk. That is good. He paints Seppala as the oppressed and the council as the aggressors. Is he so deluded that he thinks he has any gravity in this issue. He states that he does not take sides, but his words betray such a position.
Ann Lucas and her colleagues have been in my view very ‘Statesman like’ SUSI have been or are perceived at least as Tyrannical. Mr Byng should remove himself from the debate as he adds neither value nor wisdom.
Let Ann Lucas and Joy Seppala talk, unhindered by the rhetoric of those who contribute nothing. He states that ‘The argument between the city council/ACL and SISU/Otium cannot continue’ To that we will all agree whole heartedly. But Mr Byng, please stay out of something you cannot contribute too.
Let those who can, build rapport, develop understanding and ultimately resolve the issue.
I am slowly but surely becoming less than convinced of Mr Byng’s involvement in this saga.
Could anyone explain why all of a sudden he has become SISU’s guardian angel. From my perspective, all that he has added to the debate is an additional layer of smoke, in an increasingly smokey situation. After the very clear and unambiguous statement from Ann Lucas he feels it appropriate to say this. (From the CT letters today)
‘Ultimately, any owner of the football club will, to be financially viable, have to build its own stadium in the city.
There is a crying need for leadership and statesmanship. Joy Seppala offers hope of a settlement to the city council. In turn senior members of the city council must also be prepared to break the deadlock with a telephone call to Ms Seppala'
According to latest reports Ms Seppala has now acceded to the request to emerge from her bunker and talk. That is good. He paints Seppala as the oppressed and the council as the aggressors. Is he so deluded that he thinks he has any gravity in this issue. He states that he does not take sides, but his words betray such a position.
Ann Lucas and her colleagues have been in my view very ‘Statesman like’ SUSI have been or are perceived at least as Tyrannical. Mr Byng should remove himself from the debate as he adds neither value nor wisdom.
Let Ann Lucas and Joy Seppala talk, unhindered by the rhetoric of those who contribute nothing. He states that ‘The argument between the city council/ACL and SISU/Otium cannot continue’ To that we will all agree whole heartedly. But Mr Byng, please stay out of something you cannot contribute too.
Let those who can, build rapport, develop understanding and ultimately resolve the issue.