shmmeee
Well-Known Member
What is hyperbole?
Fine. You said it was a breach of privacy and they shouldn’t release photos of innocent people. Yet they do all the time. Just tell your mate to go talk to the police and have done with it.
Where did I say that? You've made yourself look foolish and now you are flat out lying about what I said.
That makes it ok then
What is hyperbole?
Fine. You said it was a breach of privacy and they shouldn’t release photos of innocent people. Yet they do all the time. Just tell your mate to go talk to the police and have done with it.
Planning on showing me where I said it was just a thing they did with football fans?
Of course it's ok. I wouldn't be the least bit bothered if it was me and I'd done nothing wrong.
Not really no.
And you can speak for everyone?
Just tell your mate to go talk to the police and have done with it.
You're a smart fella, and anyone whose in those pictures is going to have to go and speak to the police now you're right.
But to say have done with it? Incredibly naive.
In a politically sensitive incident like this they'll be desperate to prosecute someone with anything they can. Won't be the first time.
This if you haven't done anything wrong you've nothing to worry about attitude is absolute bollocks.
You're a smart fella, and anyone whose in those pictures is going to have to go and speak to the police now you're right.
But to say have done with it? Incredibly naive.
In a politically sensitive incident like this they'll be desperate to prosecute someone with anything they can. Won't be the first time.
This if you haven't done anything wrong you've nothing to worry about attitude is absolute bollocks.
“Have done with it” refers to this ridiculous argument.
As for police mistreatment. Let’s cross that bridge if we get to it. I totally get people’s reticence, but just like I wouldn’t accept a black person saying they won’t talk to police because sometimes black people are unfairly treated I won’t accept this. Refusing to talk to the police won’t change attitudes. If something happens that’s out of line and it’s brought to peoples attention it might.
Yes and the ones who gave him a beating should also be arrested and prosecuted no need for it.NOBODY that wasn't there actually knows, there were allegations that 2 lads approached supporters with knives, and I think that was based on a supporter messing around with BLM placards and talking shit about BLM... I believe that man got slapped about later that evening anyway
The whole thing is weird, and clearly it's too early to say what really happened that day.
Yes and the ones who gave him a beating should also be arrested and prosecuted no need for it.
So to think it is wrong to post photos of people who are likely innocent makes you criminally minded?
Says a lot about you
Its not. Some of us know exactly what happened.
If it's clear it's not that these people are suspected of a crime but believe they could help with establishing facts of an incident yes. Rather be able to exhause all means of contacting them and get as much info as possible than have a case fall apart because you don't want to offend a few paranoid people.
Can you imagine the conversation at the station "Sarge, we know there were a number of people in the area who may be able to help us and we've got their pictures. But I've got no idea how we can use that to help us build a better case" That'd be incompetent.
As far as we know those men are wanted for questioning in relation to a public order disturbance in which glass objects were thrown at two individuals. IF the bottles etc were thrown as two people with knives were behaving in a threatening manner (seems likely as no punches were thrown and it's logical knives is why people stood back). Then while this is wrong, and action needs taking, there clearly is mitigation.
IF fans used racist language while throwing bottles or worse still did it purely because of race, then significant charges need to be sort by the CPS.
What I loathe is the way people casually racialise incidents. It's inflammatory and does all sections of the community no favours. If race is at play let's root it out and take severe action, but without knowing the facts let's not throw damaging slurs around in such a lazy way.
They aren't wanted for anything though, if you actually read the police tweets they are simply people they want to speak to as they were there and may have witnessed something.
This is the issue, the dibble post your picture and people are going to assume you are wanted for something.
The sensationalist CET header doesn't help.
As far as we know those men are wanted for questioning in relation to a public order disturbance in which glass objects were thrown at two individuals. IF the bottles etc were thrown as two people with knives were behaving in a threatening manner (seems likely as no punches were thrown and it's logical knives is why people stood back). Then while this is wrong, and action needs taking, there clearly is mitigation.
IF fans used racist language while throwing bottles or worse still did it purely because of race, then significant charges need to be sort by the CPS.
What I loathe is the way people casually racialise incidents. It's inflammatory and does all sections of the community no favours. If race is at play let's root it out and take severe action, but without knowing the facts let's not throw damaging slurs around in such a lazy way.
So you were caught lying and you don't even have to common decency to apologise?
I'd stick to making yourself look foolish on threads about the new ground site and the trust.
Its not. Some of us know exactly what happened.
Hahahaha make me a chuckleI vote for flag number C please.
This is nothing at all to do with football btw.
Its not. Some of us know exactly what happened.
Nice whataboutery.It's to do with how the police can treat football supporters and incidents involving football supporters differently and how they can pursue a fairly serious charge for a very minor infringement when it suits them, an afftay charge for pushing someone with the tips of your fingers, jail for throwing a smoke bomb, theyre not a made up example, they happened.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?