I and I’m sure most, wouldn’t be happy with it but I am not too nieve to see the massive gulf in class between L1 and the Championship. It’s easy to forget that we still have people that were part of the L2 success and that I’m afraid is the reality when it comes to budgets etc and trying to complete.I find it hard to accept that people would be ok with relegation. We came up as champions. Failing to finish above the other 2 promoted teams plus 1 other would be a failure.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
He kept Barnsley up at this level so your assessment is based on nothingSome will passively accept relegation - to me he’s utter incapable at this level and always has been
No because Robins knows what he is doing and he knows his best system and players he is exoerimenting as we have injuries and players returning who do not fit in the system as it is so he is looking for a way to fit them in
Rotherham look more competitive than us...I and I’m sure most, wouldn’t be happy with it but I am not too nieve to see the massive gulf in class between L1 and the Championship. It’s easy to forget that we still have people that were part of the L2 success and that I’m afraid is the reality when it comes to budgets etc and trying to complete.
The Derby manager has recently and quite rightly got the sack but to try and compete and compare us to them is like trying to enter in F1 with a Vauxhall Corsa.
Rose , Dacosta , JonesHow many players are actually injured other than Godden who would have started yesterday?
And Dabo is not fully fit but he playedHow many players are actually injured other than Godden who would have started yesterday?
Rose , Dacosta , Jones
And Dabo is not fully fit but he played
Clean sheet much needed.
How many chances did we create last night in comparison to the last 2 games
We can tighten up without losing all attacking threat tho last night was an awful set up,Shipley & O’Hare shouldnt be near the 11 for cardifthis forum for the last 6 weeks - 'we've got to tighten up, we can't keep shipping goals'.
This forum after last nights clean sheet - 'we've got to attack, more, we've got to take more risks'
Fucking priceless.
this forum for the last 6 weeks - 'we've got to tighten up, we can't keep shipping goals'.
This forum after last nights clean sheet - 'we've got to attack, more, we've got to take more risks'
Fucking priceless.
We can tighten up without losing all attacking threat tho last night was an awful set up,Shipley & O’Hare shouldnt be near the 11 for cardif
We didn't tighten up though - they were just much less clinical than other teams.
we did, we conceded far less clear cut chances than of late.
Disagree - with the exception of the obvious games like Blackburn, Birmingham's XG was almost identical to our other opponents. Jutkiewicz could easily have had a hat-trick.
Meanwhile we had our lowest XG of the season bar Blackburn & even though we had 10 men for 75+ mins that game it was marginal (0.56 v 0.43)
How was O’Hare ?You've been banging on about dropping O'Hare since last year!
I agree about Shipley, he was very poor last night.
the last time the opposition had that few shots was against Barnsley in the other 0-0 draw.
Not realistic to expect the opposition not to have a decent chance or two in this league.
How was O’Hare ?
You have no idea what I do and dknt have but he’s not been great this season hence why he’s been left out recent and lasthe didn't play well. That doesn't alter the fact that you were banging on about dropping him last year so you've clearly got an agenda.
You have no idea what I do and dknt have but he’s not been great this season hence why he’s been left out recent and last
Night again proved that he was as bad as Shipley but seems to get away with it
Obtuse mainlyLess, but he contributed little in the last two games where we created more as well, and still failed to score in both matches. In fact against Forest, you could argue he cost us the match. So, what's your angle?
Some will passively accept relegation - to me he’s utter incapable at this level and always has been
If we are gonna play walker and Godden and we need a CAM maybe he shades Shipley to startyes I do, you post your opinions on here, it's a big pointer to a person mindset!
And we currently have 5 goals from our midfield of which O'Hare has 2, wouldn't be looking to bench him yet.
Of course but it's far too simplistic to look at total number of shots, it's the quality of the chance that's important & we still offered up some biggies last night.
It's the whole reason XG was introduced & adopted by all clubs otherwise you're rating Jutkiewicz's misses the same as Sheaf's speculative 25 yarder etc.
View attachment 17573
If we are gonna play walker and Godden and we need a CAM maybe he shades Shipley to start
Wednesday is my hopeI'd say that so far he's far more than shaded it. I would go with those two up top as well when both available and will be surprised if we don't when they're both fit.
Your stodge the centre Christmas Pudding formation preference will lead to a passive relegation indeed
no I'm not but we were clearly under less pressure and gave away less clear cut chances last night.
Totally unrealistic To expect a newly promoted side, (perhaps any side in this league), to totally nullify the opposition.
I have t even said play 4-5-2 but given we managed a point more than our last two games it’s an opinion I suppose....
Wonder what Robins actually made of it I’ll be worried if he felt that was a good performanceWe were playing Birmingham at 'home' rather than Watford away. Forest did bugger all and in actuality Reading created very little either bar the chances we gave them. In the first half Sheaf played one of theirs into the box and Juke was allowed a free header from point blank, thankfully they came to nothing.
All the change in setup did was remove our attacking threat while the errors remained. Nobody has said 'change the formation' in response to goals going in, they have all said 'stop making stupid mistakes in the last 10 minutes'
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?